No, because you have bagged the league upon here and have made statements I believe to be in correct and have stated your source is valuable , so how valuable is it ?
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Picola & District FL SE 2013
- Thread starter wouldIlietoyou
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
MrCopezz
Debutant
valuable on the sub rule or 4 on the bench???
here is something else i could be WRONG about, and something for everyone to CRY about me not having the same opinion or view as them... I heard Tocumwal are having a 'crisis' meating and could be coming our way in the next couple of years? i would vote for that and think its a great idea! and im sure the players would appreciate another bye. which could generate more interest for the better players in the league to play interleague, as they would get a weekend off earlier or later on in the year?.... so where is my 'OPINION' 'WRONG' here
What you heard is wrong .
MrCopezz
Debutant
HAHAHA!
wouldIlietoyou
All Australian
- Dec 1, 2009
- 903
- 243
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Thread starter
- #305
Geez will you please learn to understand a discussion. I was using an example of how rules can be differential for under 17s playing seniors and that is why Roar corrected you to clarify. I for one was glad for the clarification as I was wondering if it excluded an under 17 age player being replaced. As I said you were corrected for being not quite right.
As a player you need to learn to show respect to off field personnel who have spent a great deal of time researching this topic over a number of years and have come up with a solution.
All you have done is carry on about how you have been told you were wrong when in fact you think you were right BUT which in FACT you have been WRONG!!!
you refuse to grasp arguments yet claim we are attacking your opinion.
I am debating your opinion as i disagree and have explained why.
If as a player you want to be heard then be prepared for debates because that's how things work in the boardroom!!!
Oh and the stories re Tocumwal have been around for years. Who knows one day they may apply to come in.
Laugh all you want at being called wrong by Roar but mate some of us are getting quite a laugh from it.
MrCopezz
Debutant
As who ever you think you are, league committee ect. You have to understand a players point of view, not put your self over or above the people you researched for and trying to make better for! I stated my option on the rule and said its BS! Take it on board (it's only one players opinion) and accept that that is my opinion, this isn't a meeting it's a forum, so I can say as I please! 
So the Toc thing isn't WRONG? Or it's been the case for years? I got 2 different answers? I don't want a 2 page whinge or lecture l! I just want a brief summery on the matter! Cheers (y) see how you go with that!
So the Toc thing isn't WRONG? Or it's been the case for years? I got 2 different answers? I don't want a 2 page whinge or lecture l! I just want a brief summery on the matter! Cheers (y) see how you go with that!
Actually you are WRONG again , you can be held accountable for your comments on here and players in the past have had that occur and incurred sanction for comments within social media as per approved VCFL / AFL Vic Country Policy .As who ever you think you are, league committee ect. You have to understand a players point of view, not put your self over or above the people you researched for and trying to make better for! I stated my option on the rule and said its BS! Take it on board (it's only one players opinion) and accept that that is my opinion, this isn't a meeting it's a forum, so I can say as I please!
So the Toc thing isn't WRONG? Or it's been the case for years? I got 2 different answers? I don't want a 2 page whinge or lecture l! I just want a brief summery on the matter! Cheers (y) see how you go with that!
I suggest you research this .
Furthermore this site has rules on what can and can't be posted , I have some knowledge on those also .
wouldIlietoyou
All Australian
- Dec 1, 2009
- 903
- 243
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Thread starter
- #308
As who ever you think you are, league committee ect. You have to understand a players point of view, not put your self over or above the people you researched for and trying to make better for! I stated my option on the rule and said its BS! Take it on board (it's only one players opinion) and accept that that is my opinion, this isn't a meeting it's a forum, so I can say as I please!
So the Toc thing isn't WRONG? Or it's been the case for years? I got 2 different answers? I don't want a 2 page whinge or lecture l! I just want a brief summery on the matter! Cheers (y) see how you go with that!
If you recall both Roar and myself have both asked for your opinion when you first called BS. As you stated your opinion we argued the position we have based on the knowledge we have, we didnt dismiss your opinion without showing you the respect of giving our reasons for disagreement. I have not placed myself above anyone at any stage but I sure have argued against an opinion, your opinion, I disagree with. Sadly that post above has you putting yourself above others. I understand and accept your opinion I just dont agree with it.
Your first post today stated you wanted to reignite the flame. If you didnt want a debate then dont incite one.
My arguments werent just for your benefit but for others reading this forum so they can understand why this rule has been put up by the board and why I am taking such a strong stance on it. I think I have been pretty up front.
You have been called wrong on things you have been wrong about.
You may be surprised what action takes place after discussions on this forum. Sometimes it can be more productive than a meeting.
The Toc thing has been a RUMOUR for years. Take from that whether you think it wrong or right.
MrCopezz
Debutant
What your gonna sideline me for an opinion!? Or maybe a fine? Haha do it...
Got confirmation 4 on the bench is definitely on the cards if the sub rule doesn't come into affect! We will find out tomorrow won't we
Got confirmation 4 on the bench is definitely on the cards if the sub rule doesn't come into affect! We will find out tomorrow won't we
wouldIlietoyou
All Australian
- Dec 1, 2009
- 903
- 243
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Thread starter
- #310
Well I hope clubs have the good sense to pass the junior sub rule.
All these years clubs could have asked for a 4 man bench did anyone else think of it?
No not until someone does a lot of work and comes up with a concept they go oh gee lets have another senior player on the bench. Stuff doing what's right for juniors or what may be good for the game.
Well lets just see what this league is all about shall we. Spending more $$$ on a senior player, something plenty whinge about, to grab a flag. or take the opportunity to be seen as a league that puts development of our kids and also trying to keep players in the game as a priority.
All these years clubs could have asked for a 4 man bench did anyone else think of it?
No not until someone does a lot of work and comes up with a concept they go oh gee lets have another senior player on the bench. Stuff doing what's right for juniors or what may be good for the game.
Well lets just see what this league is all about shall we. Spending more $$$ on a senior player, something plenty whinge about, to grab a flag. or take the opportunity to be seen as a league that puts development of our kids and also trying to keep players in the game as a priority.
wouldIlietoyou
All Australian
- Dec 1, 2009
- 903
- 243
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Thread starter
- #311
On an extra bye, your league delegates voted against an extra bye. NW voted to include an extra bye! Great idea that one hey! Why wait to have another team to come in to make that happen. Your opinion on an extra bye isn't wrong I agree in fact we have already acted on that after listening to our players. If another team enters can reassess then.
I hear from my very reliable source that Toc may not be the only club interested in joining our league! If this goes through the standard would definitely be raised by a cog or 2!!!!
Ps by our league I mean the PDFL as a whole! Yes Toc are interested "apparently" in joining the NW Division but this other club from my source is potentially interested in joining the SW Division!!
Ps by our league I mean the PDFL as a whole! Yes Toc are interested "apparently" in joining the NW Division but this other club from my source is potentially interested in joining the SW Division!!
Wrong again .What your gonna sideline me for an opinion!? Or maybe a fine? Haha do it...
Got confirmation 4 on the bench is definitely on the cards if the sub rule doesn't come into affect! We will find out tomorrow won't we
What your gonna sideline me for an opinion!? Or maybe a fine? Haha do it...
Got confirmation 4 on the bench is definitely on the cards if the sub rule doesn't come into affect! We will find out tomorrow won't we
I'm thinking I might get a ring setup so u 2 can have a 6 X 3min round dust up, we can charge people to watch to make some money with all proceeds going into the Junior Development program?? Should be 2 things- 1. Fun to watch & 2. Raise money for a good cause?? So who's keen?
Ps u's can even debate with each other whilst in the ring throwing a round house or 2??
First of all. This is a discussion forum not a place to rib each other. Grow up. Personal option not gospel.
Second of all the Toc thing IS correct. They ARE applying to enter the NW league.
Can people please spell incorrect properly it's not two words.
Last of all. For those who want MrCopezz to reveal his secret identity I think you will find its not very hard to work out. Have a bit of a flip through the results and you will work it out rather quickly and if you don't then you don't deserve to know.
Second of all the Toc thing IS correct. They ARE applying to enter the NW league.
Can people please spell incorrect properly it's not two words.
Last of all. For those who want MrCopezz to reveal his secret identity I think you will find its not very hard to work out. Have a bit of a flip through the results and you will work it out rather quickly and if you don't then you don't deserve to know.
wouldIlietoyou
All Australian
- Dec 1, 2009
- 903
- 243
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Thread starter
- #316
Why wouldn't clubs be interested in joining our league? Be great to have some new clubs if they tick the boxes.
Ideally I would like to see 10 on each side. Not sure this is the time of year anything official can happen. IIRC applications can't be lodged until towards the end of the season?? Unless of course that has changed.
Ideally I would like to see 10 on each side. Not sure this is the time of year anything official can happen. IIRC applications can't be lodged until towards the end of the season?? Unless of course that has changed.
I think it will be great. They will apply at the AGM when needed too. Just getting some ideas from the clubs now as to the possibility.
wouldIlietoyou
All Australian
- Dec 1, 2009
- 903
- 243
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Thread starter
- #318
That's maybe why Roar is saying No because until something official is on the table then its well not official.
We have had this kinda thing before I think Coleambully were talking it up once but I think they didn't go ahead with an application as their enquiries revealed they wouldn't succeed.
Toc in my own opinion would be good. In a good spot re travel which is a big thing. Great venue. Wow NW would have some pretty good venues to play at. Be better for their kids to have a greater chance of being competitive. I feel they will get a positive response from clubs.
MrCopezz
Debutant
About time some non-league committee people commented on this forum again, wouldilietoyou is full of it then because him/Her said it was wrong when I just wanted opinions and/or confirmation, So is there truth to it?!!! (Toc want in)
I've been right on everything I've said, the pdfl committee might wanna check their emailing list or save their documents to a physical hard drive rather than a online one instead of denying everything when it's in front of me!... The 4 man on the Bench has been in the rules for ages, every club and the league didn't realise until recent!
As for my 'identity' easier to find than a Tungamah win!
I've been right on everything I've said, the pdfl committee might wanna check their emailing list or save their documents to a physical hard drive rather than a online one
instead of denying everything when it's in front of me!... The 4 man on the Bench has been in the rules for ages, every club and the league didn't realise until recent!As for my 'identity' easier to find than a Tungamah win!
wouldIlietoyou
All Australian
- Dec 1, 2009
- 903
- 243
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Thread starter
- #320
About time some non-league committee people commented on this forum again, wouldilietoyou is full of it then because him/Her said it was wrong when I just wanted opinions and/or confirmation, So is there truth to it?!!! (Toc want in)
I've been right on everything I've said, the pdfl committee might wanna check their emailing list or save their documents to a physical hard drive rather than a online one
As for my 'identity' easier to find than a Tungamah win!
First I am not on any committees this year. I know somethings via my involvement in the junior program.
Now Show me the post where I said you were wrong re toc. I said it has been rumoured for years who knows one day they may apply to get in. I then said its been rumoured for years take from that if right or wrong. I know from previous experience that It isn't official until the application is lodged and I know that can't happen until later in the year. Not sure how that is full of it?? So you are WRONG at least have the decency to admit it this time. I have refrained from personal insults towards you I ask that you grant me the same.
I know the rules read my posts I said I was concerned when clubs were made aware of the rules they may want a 4 man bench and not the junior sub rule. That's why I have argued the junior sub rule today. The league I believe was upfront and told clubs about it which is a good thing. Remember our league president (in his first year) is the one who disclosed that to clubs and was our JDO previously. He found the issue whilst looking at a way to introduce the junior sub rule. he simply wanted our league to make better use of a loophole we have, to try to resolve a problem he had seen in his term as JDO.
You haven't been right mate. The clubs are voting on the junior sub rule only not as you suggested that OR the 4 man bench.
If the junior rule doesn't get up well I guess we'll see if clubs then decide they will play with 22. But that won't be decided tomorrow.
This isn't about WHO is wrong or right. It is about WHAT is right or wrong.
With all due respect I can assure you I do have some very good knowledge on these matters and I can also assure I do know mrcooezz's identity . No one has asked him to reveal his identity he was simply given a offer , which I might add was a little piss take , so you are wrong to suggest others have asked him to reveal his identity .First of all. This is a discussion forum not a place to rib each other. Grow up. Personal option not gospel.
Second of all the Toc thing IS correct. They ARE applying to enter the NW league.
Can people please spell incorrect properly it's not two words.
Last of all. For those who want MrCopezz to reveal his secret identity I think you will find its not very hard to work out. Have a bit of a flip through the results and you will work it out rather quickly and if you don't then you don't deserve to know.
If he is not correct be will be told so . Which has been the case on many occasions including the alledged Tocumwal scenario, you are also wrong .
It may be a forum and you are correct people are entitled to have a OPINION . But to state things as fact that clearly are not is not appropriate and is also misleading .
You have not been correct and have been very loose with your facts and in particular the specifics of what you have claimed as facts. Bout time you worried about playing football and stopped trying to tell others what is or isn't happening and what they should or shouldn't be doing .About time some non-league committee people commented on this forum again, wouldilietoyou is full of it then because him/Her said it was wrong when I just wanted opinions and/or confirmation, So is there truth to it?!!! (Toc want in)
I've been right on everything I've said, the pdfl committee might wanna check their emailing list or save their documents to a physical hard drive rather than a online one
As for my 'identity' easier to find than a Tungamah win!
You have clearly shown you are not aware of all facts and therefore should not be making public statements in such matters .
MrCopezz
Debutant
And you should stick to netball, I stated opinion, rumours and what I heard, after all it is a forum for that. But then you 2 girls went all Caroline Wilson on our arses! Settle down sandy, settle down...
NOW for some ACTUAL football talk!
Predicting results for this week? with 4 teams tied up at 2nd who knows what will happen this week?
Has anyone changed their mind on who is taking out the league medal!? And who will play off against Tungamah?
NOW for some ACTUAL football talk!
Predicting results for this week? with 4 teams tied up at 2nd who knows what will happen this week?
Has anyone changed their mind on who is taking out the league medal!? And who will play off against Tungamah?
Wrong again .
MrCopezz
Debutant
Shhhh Miss Caroline Wilson...
NOW for some ACTUAL football talk!
Predicting results for this week? with 4 teams tied up at 2nd who knows what will happen this week?
Has anyone changed their mind on who is taking out the league medal!? And who will play off against Tungamah?
- Status
