Players who deserve to be premiership players

Remove this Banner Ad

Listen Pie boy you're team in 1990 was shyte scared of us. Had we played you in the finals we would've belted you. You won't admit it here but you know I'm correct.

Collingwood 1990 what a joke, worst premiers ever

Mate the Hawks weren't good enough to even play us in the finals, let alone good enough to even think about beating us.
 
Factional comment on the 1990 season

Pies saved their best footy for the real contenders like Essendon & West Coast, put in one shocker against hawthorn the week after playing the H&A game of the season. Plenty of good sides have lapses of concentration when they come up against teams who are middle of the road.

All that massive loss to Hawthorn did was wake the boys up to realise that they have to come to play every week, unlike simply rocking up believing they would win.

Hawthorn were simply making up the numbers - FACT

Pies beat Sydney & West Coast this year, suppose by ur reckoning we should have won the flag!!

Pls Hawthorn won the cup 1989 and 1991 but were middle of the road or making up- the numbers in 1990 ha hah hah ahh a you know nothing on footy.
 
Pls Hawthorn won the cup 1989 and 1991 but were middle of the road or making up- the numbers in 1990 ha hah hah ahh a you know nothing on footy.
89 & 91 are not 90

90 essendon dominated the H&A, but pies smashed everybody in the finals

Hawthorn limped into the finals in 5th and were knocked out by melbourne, gee must have been real good those hawks of 90
 

Log in to remove this ad.

89 & 91 are not 90

90 essendon dominated the H&A, but pies smashed everybody in the finals

Hawthorn limped into the finals in 5th and were knocked out by melbourne, gee must have been real good those hawks of 90

No Collingwood didn't smash everyone in the finals may'be the teams you played but not everyone as had you played Hawthorn it would've given Sydney's record final loss a shake. But hey you barrack for Collingwood and should be use to losing finals
 
Team sport - the players that deserve a premiership are those that make up a premiership team. That's it.

If you're talking about individual players, then talk about individual awards.
 
McHawk, Doppleganger, Sanitsrule, Whippersnipper, take it outside.

In answer to the question, of players still going round I'll say Harvey and Crawford (I'd say Grant but the bias would be obvious)

Of recent retirees I can't help but think of Rohan Smith. He deserved a better final game than the one we gave him. Paul Williams also

Of all time, I think Skilton and Flower are the ones that stand out
 
McHawk, Doppleganger, Sanitsrule, Whippersnipper, take it outside.

In answer to the question, of players still going round I'll say Harvey and Crawford (I'd say Grant but the bias would be obvious)

Of recent retirees I can't help but think of Rohan Smith. He deserved a better final game than the one we gave him. Paul Williams also

Of all time, I think Skilton and Flower are the ones that stand out

If people didn't speak %^& then a response wouldn't be necessary.

Most playeres in this thread mentioned I don't think deserve them, people IMHO are wanting to hand out medallions like knives and forks at dinner time.
 
If people didn't speak %^& then a response wouldn't be necessary.

Most playeres in this thread mentioned I don't think deserve them, people IMHO are wanting to hand out medallions like knives and forks at dinner time.
Totally agree.:thumbsu:
 
McHawk, Doppleganger, Sanitsrule, Whippersnipper, take it outside.

In answer to the question, of players still going round I'll say Harvey and Crawford (I'd say Grant but the bias would be obvious)

Of recent retirees I can't help but think of Rohan Smith. He deserved a better final game than the one we gave him. Paul Williams also

Of all time, I think Skilton and Flower are the ones that stand out
The point of this board is friendly debate on footballing issues. I see nothing in the posts I, or saintsrule made, that was not friendly debate. You dont like that, dont bother posting.
 
No Collingwood didn't smash everyone in the finals may'be the teams you played but not everyone as had you played Hawthorn it would've given Sydney's record final loss a shake. But hey you barrack for Collingwood and should be use to losing finals

But we didn't play the Hawks in the finals, that's a fact. Unless you have recently come into possesion of a crystal ball, it's a bit hard to categorically say you would have beaten us. It's like saying if Buckley hadn't left the Bears, they still would have dominated. The team list could have been completely different had he stayed. Or because Freo beat West Coast in the regular season, they deserve to be premiers, because they would have smashed them in the finals aswell. But they didn't get the chance to find out, that's just the way the cookie crumbles. We beat who we needed too; you guys weren't good enough to advance through to face us, tough ********.

I'd like to say Buckley, playing for Collingwood for so many years, when, let's face it, we WERE crap. He was a shining light for Pie fans, like him or not. But then again, I'm probably biased :)

I'd say the Bulldogs trio of West, Grant and Smith have been unlucky, but then again, if your team isn't good enough to win the flag, then you don't deserve one.

PS. If you did indeed find a crystal ball, please give me some good stock tips :)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Haven't read the thread, but Premierships have nothing to do with individual players.

It should be whihc great teams deserved to win a flag but never did.
 
The point of this board is friendly debate on footballing issues. I see nothing in the posts I, or saintsrule made, that was not friendly debate. You dont like that, dont bother posting.

Calling each other pathetic, imbecile, captain dip******* etc is not friendly debate, it belongs on Bay 13.

PS, Doppleganger, McHawk, I'll withdraw my allegations against the two of you. Upon further reading you guys kept the insults to each other's teams. Fair enough IMO.
 
Hey Bushie, this person doesn't agree with McManus or Parker either, I assume you are going to turn your vitriol on him also, by the way he's not a Eagles supporter either.

I don't think it's right that people choose to have a different view to your own :rolleyes:

Look mate if I was to really crank up the vitriol on you, you would know it.
I have merely pointed out on other posts , on other threads, how pleased I am that a well known Freagle has finally jumped on a bandwagon. But unfortunately IMO...once a Freagle....always a Freagle.
 
Calling each other pathetic, imbecile, captain dip******* etc is not friendly debate, it belongs on Bay 13.

PS, Doppleganger, McHawk, I'll withdraw my allegations against the two of you. Upon further reading you guys kept the insults to each other's teams. Fair enough IMO.


I think you can withdraw them for the most part against me. I believe my arguments were reasonable on the whole and the personal insults were very much one way!
 
Look mate if I was to really crank up the vitriol on you, you would know it.I have merely pointed out on other posts , on other threads, how pleased I am that a well known Freagle has finally jumped on a bandwagon. But unfortunately IMO...once a Freagle....always a Freagle.

oooohh.

Just for info never been a Freagle, have hated the purple since inception, have followed Eagles since their inception.

To be a "Freagle" I'd assume a bet each way please find one, just one positive I've ever had with regard to the Dorkers which would lead you too this conclusion.

I consider a Freagle to be one of those supporters who followed the Eagles and indeed wallowed in our success in 92 & 94 only to jump ship on inception of the dockers - people like you station boy.

I believe Freo's history since then is contributable to Karma - all you fly by nighters that slipped over to freo brought it on yourselves.
 
oooohh.

Just for info never been a Freagle, have hated the purple since inception, have followed Eagles since their inception.

To be a "Freagle" I'd assume a bet each way please find one, just one positive I've ever had with regard to the Dorkers which would lead you too this conclusion.

I consider a Freagle to be one of those supporters who followed the Eagles and indeed wallowed in our success in 92 & 94 only to jump ship on inception of the dockers - people like you station boy.

I believe Freo's history since then is contributable to Karma - all you fly by nighters that slipped over to freo brought it on yourselves.



Tissue??
 
Calling each other pathetic, imbecile, captain dip******* etc is not friendly debate, it belongs on Bay 13.

PS, Doppleganger, McHawk, I'll withdraw my allegations against the two of you. Upon further reading you guys kept the insults to each other's teams. Fair enough IMO.
Okay the captain dip******** comment is fair enough, but I se nothing else in the posts I made that classes as Bay 13 material. Bay 13 is for trolling, my posts were clerly not of a trolling nature. Just because the language is colourful doesnt mean the content is any less valid.

Saintsrule's posting belongs on Bay 13 - clear example then of a case of TROLLING.
 
post_old.gif
11th September 2006, 09:48 #44 Mutant vbmenu_register("postmenu_5786623", true);
BigFooty Member

Join Date: Jul 2005
Club: Unlisted
Other Teams: 92,94, 06 & Willo Blues
Location: Home


Re: West Australian Football
Quote:
Originally Posted by bushie
Upset you on a previous forum did I??


BTW which team do you support again??


MUTANT
I've told you before, from the end of September last year until the start of the season it was the Swans, (makes for a good summer), most of this season I've been on Adelaide but thinking maybe time to get back on the Swans or maybe West Coast, I'll let you know.



You have my apologies...

You are not a Freagle at all....



Just a very confused boy!!!
 
Okay the captain dip******** comment is fair enough, but I se nothing else in the posts I made that classes as Bay 13 material. Bay 13 is for trolling, my posts were clerly not of a trolling nature. Just because the language is colourful doesnt mean the content is any less vald.

Saintsrule's posting belongs on Bay 13 - clear example then of a case of TROLLING.

How does arguing that Harvey deserves a premiership at least just as much as Grant does and defending Harvey against your unsubstantiated slurs on his character, equate to trolling?
 
Not that he is a shining example of a player that deserved one, but just to take a slightly different approach, Matthew Clarke was unlucky not to get one. He played with Brisbane and Adelaide, but in the wrong order.
From Adelaide, Tony Modra did deserve one but is miles behind other guys that have already been mentioned like Skilton, Flower, Harvey, Bulldogs old brigade.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Players who deserve to be premiership players

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top