I’m aware but I was making reference to the fact that the original poster said we have our assigned colours, we must use them. I don’t think it says anywhere that we must use all our assigned colours on every guernsey. If we wanted to wear a white guernsey with a black sash, I don’t believe we could be stopped.
I get not really the point of the argument but more a nitpick in the original posters point.
Can you provide evidence of this eternal contractual agreement? They've had many contracts over the years, allowing them to wear the uniform, so your statement seems false. Also, I'm confused as to why Collingwood fans even care, since they're not even going to wear it against them, nor is it the same design. Must be some silly tribal thing.
Did they? If that’s the case, why have they worn it on multiple occasions in the AFL already?
Probably a breach of contract.
Like it or not there is an agreement in place, now I know a lot of you don't like it and call it 'tribal' (like there's something wrong about being tribal about ones club).
It's not up to any of us to make a call on it, I googled this and immediately pages came up:
We can argue this infinitum and it won't change a thing. The contract may be broken years or decades down the track and that'd be a shame.
The Black & White stripes belong to one club and one club only in this league, that club has been in this league before Port Adelaide were given a competition licence. Port Adelaide relinquished their prison bar stripes to play in this league. That is the agreement, like it lump it.
I've made my case as have many others, so you can all continue to question me and others in perpetual futility. I'm past replying now as you all know the situation.