Post Your Final Teams

[BLue_Bloys]

Some interesting teams on here. Now that its all locked in, im happy to post my side up.

Why is the Dustin Martin Box sitting below where it should be?

Anyway, interesting to go with 4 starting mid rookies. How long do you think it will be before you upgrade?

 

[yogibbear]

Hey all, now it's officail happy to post my team.

Same strategy as usual, has done very well for me over the last few years.

Backs Goddard, Enright, Goodwin, Hodge, Ellis, Waters, Maguire (silvagni,nason)

Midfielders Ablett, Bartel, Scully, Trengrove, Martin, Barlow (schuey, bastinac)

Rucks Sandilands, Hille (warnock, Lobe)

Forwards Riewoldt, Goodes, O'keefe, Brown, Pavlich, R Murphy, Dangerfield (gumby, hitchcock)

This could win ^^. I would be frickin' scared if i saw that team as my elim opponent.

 

[Hodges]

Why is the Dustin Martin Box sitting below where it should be?

Anyway, interesting to go with 4 starting mid rookies. How long do you think it will be before you upgrade?

Probably as soon as good opportunities present themselves. The good thing is all 6 of my mid rookies should be best 22, so im in no rush to get them out before they get dropped.

As for Martin, its because of the VC on Bartel. For some reason it makes whatever box is below it drop down...

 

[WandallBone]

Interesting how few people trusted Nic Nat when it came to pulling the trigger. rightly I feel.

 

[trueblue_91]

This could win ^^. I would be frickin' scared if i saw that team as my elim opponent.

cheers mate, ironicly with this strategy scores are usaully are little worse off at the beggining, but from round 8 onwards it kicks in with huge scores weekly. If i get a decent start and trade well all should be good

 

[Budgie63]

cheers mate, ironicly with this strategy scores are usaully are little worse off at the beggining, but from round 8 onwards it kicks in with huge scores weekly. If i get a decent start and trade well all should be good

I've used the same strategy, different mix.

 

[jimmy_c8]

Backs: Enright, Duffield, Hodge, H Shaw, Birchall, Kennelly, Hunt (Maguire, Nason)

Mids: Bartel, Boyd, Pendlebury, Trengove, Martin, Barlow (Banner, Bastinac)

Rucks: Sandilands, Hille (Warnock, Lobbe)

Fwds: Didak, ROK, Harvey, Gia, R Murphy, Ziebell, Dangerfield (Hitchcock, Gumbleton)

 

[94_Eagles]

I've used the same strategy, different mix.

3 players from the same team in the forward line is risky IMO.

 

[Blue Dimension]

I went with Sylvia. Could really burn me if he doesn't play next week but there was talk he was ready for round 1 even, so I've taken the plunge. Better play next week or I'll not be a happy chap.

 

[smiths]

^ That was a risk, but if he gets up should perform well.

Very glad to see only 2-3 teams with Stevie J, good unique pick who can easily get in top 5 forwards IMO

 

[Blue Dimension]

^ That was a risk, but if he gets up should perform well.

I really liked what he did last year, and imo was underpriced after injury late in the year last year. It could turn out to be a disaster but hoping he comes through for me.

I would have gone with Buddy ahead of Tippet too had Sylvia not been injured, unfortunately that's the way the cookie crumbles.

 

[Just_ace]

now that we have lockout.

pretty happy with it bar 1 or 2 players.

 

[Walshy_The_Goat]

My secret is out...

Fairly happy with my sides balance, and signs are good thus far with the premiums i've selected. Only really a little disappointed with Hunt and Armitage, although i'm willing to stick by Armitage for a little bit as he remains my smokey.

Even though i brought in Tippett partly for the ability to swap him with Lobbe using dual positioning, i didn't actually think i'd ever have to use it, let alone in Round 2. Happy i followed my instincts on that, with Hille looking likely to cop a ban for his bump. I just hope Gray is fit by next week.

 

[Galacticos]

3 players from the same team in the forward line is risky IMO.

and why would that be risky?
Don't you just hate it when people just say stuff without backing it up with a reason.

 

[craigy]

Swift let me down :<

 

[WandallBone]

and why would that be risky?
Don't you just hate it when people just say stuff without backing it up with a reason.

I thought it went without saying?

 

[dont bowl there]

I thought it went without saying?

Why is it risky though? Gia plays HFF/Mid and so does Higgins.

 

[Just_ace]

good to see alot of teams over looking J Brown

 

[Tom12]

He was always going to be a good pick, I just didn't have the cash to fit him in over other players.
3 fwd line players from WB isn't bad, generally guys like Gia push up to the flanks etc.

 

[$tylez]

B - Goddard, Enright, Grimes, Hodge, Carrazo, Shaw, Waters (Maguire, Silvagni)

M - Bartel, Ball, Trengove , Martin, Barlow, Shuey (Bastinac, Shuey)

R - Tippett, Hille (Warnock, McCauley)

F - Riewoldt, SJohnson, Okeefe, JBrown, Pavlich, Gia, Gray (Gumby Roberts)

 

[Blues_FC]

Goddard
Enright
Scotland
Hodge
Malceski
Hunt
Waters (Maguire, Ladson)

Bartel
Selwood
Ball
Trengove
Martin
Barlow (Shuey, Bastinac)

Sandi
Clark (Warnock, Seamus Mac)

Voldt
ROK
Harvey
Gia
Franklin
Hall
Dangerfield (Hitchcock, Roberts)

3k in the bank.

Very similar to my team.

 

[WandallBone]

Why is it risky though? Gia plays HFF/Mid and so does Higgins.

no, you're right. it is always good to have all your eggs in one basket.

 

[The Falcon Strike]

no, you're right. it is always good to have all your eggs in one basket.

it was last year - with geelong players

 

[dont bowl there]

no, you're right. it is always good to have all your eggs in one basket.

What having three players from the one side is all his eggs?

 

[BartBart]

Went a few smokies:

DEF: Enright, Kelly, Hodge, Harbrow, Hurn, Hunt, Waters (Macguire, Nason)
MID: Swan, Bartel, A.Selwood, Ball, Martin, Barlow (Shuey, Bastinac)
RUCK: Clark, McIntosh (Warnock, Macauley)
FWD: Riewoldt, O'Keefe, Giansiracusa, Kennedy, Ballantyne, Warren, Dangerfield (Hitchock,Roberts)