I think the division approach has been really positive. Of course clubs will come into div 3 but they could come from centre of bris as well.
Consultation with clubs sounds nice and cuddly but in reality every club is only interested in what I is best for their situation. Hence you allow an executive model make decisions that are based around what’s best for the code. It’s in noones interest for Gympie/Pomona to not have anyone to play against. The exact reason why the afl went to a commission model to steer away From the vested interest that clubs brought to the table.
Hearing you re div 4&5. Source of frustration at headquarters I think too bc they would love to have more clubs with 2 teams. Travel in the SE corner will always be an issue, always has been. My solution would be to have a glass half full approach and look at the number of games you play at home and close by...
Consultation with clubs sounds nice and cuddly but in reality every club is only interested in what I is best for their situation. Hence you allow an executive model make decisions that are based around what’s best for the code. It’s in noones interest for Gympie/Pomona to not have anyone to play against. The exact reason why the afl went to a commission model to steer away From the vested interest that clubs brought to the table.
Hearing you re div 4&5. Source of frustration at headquarters I think too bc they would love to have more clubs with 2 teams. Travel in the SE corner will always be an issue, always has been. My solution would be to have a glass half full approach and look at the number of games you play at home and close by...