- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,601
Hearing Riddell have 4 missing due to a wedding tomorrow. Anyone confirm or deny ?
Have heard that too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Hearing Riddell have 4 missing due to a wedding tomorrow. Anyone confirm or deny ?
Paul and Mick Sahlberg among them. Wallan are missing a handful that would have been handy in the conditions.Hearing Riddell have 4 missing due to a wedding tomorrow. Anyone confirm or deny ?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I tend to agree the league needs to get on the front foot more and hose down some of the baseless speculation.Secondly, its not for me to comment on the Wallan thing, I worked local media during the previous time they went over to NFL. Basically it was because many thought the RDFL was actually dissolving ... maybe all the uncertainty of what's going on and the fact no one from RDFL or AFL Goldfields are exactly filling clubs will clarity has opened the door for a pro-active club to have a look around and simple open dialogue with it's members and neighbouring options?
Hearing Riddell have 4 missing due to a wedding tomorrow. Anyone confirm or deny ?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Have heard that too.
Yep, starts with those elected to lead the RDFL, second then to those nomintaed to represent the shareholders ... the clubs.I tend to agree the league needs to get on the front foot more and hose down some of the baseless speculation.
On the other hand if there wasn’t so many people intent on trading gossip they wouldn’t need to.
Not sure who you think you are calling me a liar but that’s what he told me that he didn’t play if you read my post it does state that he sat on the bench so that means he was at all games.
This is going to be pretty close I would think, we will have to start calling u Nostradamus bro.My top 6 would be:
Riddell
Diggers
Rupo
Romsey
Wallan
Macedon
This is going to be pretty close I would think, we will have to start calling u Nostradamus bro.
So the tail is wagging the dog at Wallan?I believe it has been discussed with the current playing group.
I would think committee would discuss and investigate. Then talk to playing group then take to members. Appears this is what has happened. Seems correct process to meSo the tail is wagging the dog at Wallan?
Players come & go. The future of the WFC is at stake here, its a board decision.I would think committee would discuss and investigate. Then talk to playing group then take to members. Appears this is what has happened. Seems correct process to me
That’s not what I’m suggesting.Players come & go. The future of the WFC is at stake here, its a board decision.
I believe it has been discussed with the current playing group.
So the tail is wagging the dog at Wallan?
I would think committee would discuss and investigate. Then talk to playing group then take to members. Appears this is what has happened. Seems correct process to me
Players come & go. The future of the WFC is at stake here, its a board decision.
Hope this is readableDoes anyone have a link to the finals Roster for this year please
Thank youHope this is readable
Can someone please explain the merits of why the top 6 finals are the way they are? I still for the life of me can’t work out why 1 plays 2 for a second semi spot and yet 3 plays 6 for the same right. It just makes no sense on all levels. Just plain dumb.
I know this isn’t a shared view but if it’s a top 6 I don’t believe there is a better system. Definitely not a perfect system though.It’s weird isn’t it but to make it worse the AFL used to use this system.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I disagree, why couldn’t 1 n 2 be gifted the second Semi spots week 2, 3 v 6 and 4 v 5 to play in the first semi week 2. It’s 1 less final but surely 1 n 2 earn a week off and both get the double chance. Seems a fairer system dontchya reckon.I know this isn’t a shared view but if it’s a top 6 I don’t believe there is a better system. Definitely not a perfect system though.
I know this isn’t a shared view but if it’s a top 6 I don’t believe there is a better system. Definitely not a perfect system though.
I disagree, why couldn’t 1 n 2 be gifted the second Semi spots week 2, 3 v 6 and 4 v 5 to play in the first semi week 2. It’s 1 less final but surely 1 n 2 earn a week off and both get the double chance. Seems a fairer system dontchya reckon.