- Banned
- #126
Wrong, they were unsucessful clubs, hence both of them having to merge/move.
On that flawed logic, Hawthorn aren't a successful club b/c they were forced to merge? LOL.
St Kilda is more sucessful because they have not had to merge/fold/whatever.
You must be pretty young. In the mid 80's, St. Kilda were forced to close their business/club. You must not know anything about the 60 cents in the dollar scheme.
In biology those who survive to reproduce are 'fitter' and 'more sucessful' than those who dont
Take it to the biology board. This is sport, this is the AFL, this is about premierships, not natural selection.
By definition, these 2 clubs are the most unsucessful clubs (apart from university) in the VFL/AFL's history.
St. Kilda is the most unsuccessful club in the AFL. Every neutral expert/supporter/indicator agrees with this, deal with it.
Dont just look at premierships to determine the sucessfulness of a club.
I LOL'd.
Where does St. Kilda sit in the successfulness of all the AFL clubs. Only a supporter who hasn't seen his club win a flag can say premierships don't determine how successful a club is. You fail.