Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we'll match, even if we have to use pick 14. 11 isnt too far from our first pick anyway.
we'll match, even if we have to use pick 14. 11 isnt too far from our first pick anyway.
Yeah, Surely Crows would do a deal.I imagine we'd also be a pretty easy club to pry 9 from in this draft.
Yeah, Surely Crows would do a deal.
We have to land Reef
Not at all. They are picks 40+ in the draft who got no VFL experience to press their claims. The fact that one of the group, Ruscoe, got games was above expectation. Hopefully at least one of the 3 can become best 22 in 2021 but their chances in 2020 were scuppered and kids at that level generally play little if any senior footy in their 1st season even if everything runs their waySurely you must admit it was strange neither Rantall or Bianco got a game when we barely had enough fit blokes to form a 22 in the football frenzy periods.
Geez we traded out A grade talent, our best junior and a solid best 22. That’s not dead wood. Some kids will get a chance now as spots are there but these are not top rated youngsters. Hopefully a few will make it but, excluding Quaynor(maybe Kelly too), I don’t think we have the next Treloar and Stephenson amongst the players you mention. Hopefully 2-3 Phillips amongst them.How do you know unless you play them but off the top of my head
Rantall Bianco T brown Murphy Sier
Ruscoe Keane and Atu got bugger all chances to prove themselves last season
Kelly unlucky with injury.
Quaynor Noble and Cal Brown the only younger players given lengthy opportunities to settle in
Hopefully with dead wood traded out and youth drafted in the attitudes to selection can change. We haven’t got the balance right.
Geez we traded out A grade talent, our best junior and a solid best 22. That’s not dead wood. Some kids will get a chance now as spots are there but these are not top rated youngsters. Hopefully a few will make it but, excluding Quaynor(maybe Kelly too), I don’t think we have the next Treloar and Stephenson amongst the players you mention. Hopefully 2-3 Phillips amongst them.
Also that pick 9 would be downgraded to pick 11 with other NGA bids going by Cal's phantom draft.IF Crows do bid at 9 - what will it cost us to match?
From my rough calculations, I get the following:
Crows P9(1,469) - 25% = 1,102
Pies P16(1,067) + P18(985) = 2,052
That leaves 950 = Pick 19.
Therefore Reef will cost us 16 and downgrade of 18 to 19. If we rate him, it's a no brainer given most experts rate the backend of the first round evenly
If we were to trade 14 & 16 to Crows today for 9 and 21 most would do it. Matching the bid puts us in a better position
Also that pick 9 would be downgraded to pick 11 with other NGA bids going by Cal's phantom draft.
So pick 11 = 1329 - 25% = 996 points.
In that case we don't downgrade our Pick 18. So effectively it's an upgrade of Pick 16 to Pick 11. Surely we match
Thats right, after the first 6-7 players, its pretty even.You would think so.
Especially been a Even Draft after about Pick 6
Ah okay.The discount for academy players is 20% now I believe.
IF Crows do bid at 9 - what will it cost us to match?
From my rough calculations, I get the following:
Crows P9(1,469) - 25% = 1,102
Pies P16(1,067) + P18(985) = 2,052
That leaves 950 = Pick 19.
Therefore Reef will cost us 16 and downgrade of 18 to 19. If we rate him, it's a no brainer given most experts rate the backend of the first round evenly
If we were to trade 14 & 16 to Crows today for 9 and 21 most would do it. Matching the bid puts us in a better position
A bid outside the top 20 would be very good. Fingers crossed.Knightmare doesnt believe Reef will get a bid inside #20 which is where Pies take Pedlar
JUH , Campbell, Jones bids would mean the pies 1st pick is #17 and a bid after #11 would mean that #17 is the breakeven to match that bid
#12 =1268
-20%
-----------
1015 points required to match
#17 = 1025 points
Bid at pick 9 would take away #17 and push #19 back to #24 which could end up #26 if Gulden and Downie gets bids
that would be a disaster.
So looking like if no pick trades then a bid after #12 gets matched but prior maybe not
Thanks TD, I know you are just posting it but I'm not keen on seeing the attachment to Adelaide, the kids versatility and speed is such a need right now and a big body in the middle with pace. Maybe the Club knew what they were doing in getting rid of AT.
This, sounds reasonable to me.Its just as much about ensuring 3 top 15 type quality picks imo, by getting ahead of a bid, and then exploiting the discount, when the bid comes. Adelaide's 9 & 23 helps us get a top 10/12 & then Reef, but its the 2021 first rounder that helps us get three top kids in, including Reef... whilst a first next year is wasted with Nicky D. Fascinating stuff, but we need to land a Cox type, then a Perkins / Macrae / Cook / Laurie type mid... then Reef... then hopefully a strong forward slider later on
We definitely have to land Reef after spending the best part of a year talking him up as though single-handedly he will drag our club back to the head of the competition. I can't recall a played being hyped so much for so long - except Nick Daicos for next year.We have to land Reef
heh I wonder if thats my fault. I started talking about him the moment I saw him at training 12 months ago.We definitely have to land Reef after spending the best part of a year talking him up as though single-handedly he will drag our club back to the head of the competition. I can't recall a played being hyped so much for so long - except Nick Daicos for next year.