Richmond VS Melbourne: Battle of the two best young lists in the AFL?

[rick James]

Coming from you, that's an compliment.

That's a compliment, not an. bonehead.

 

[rick James]

rJ is fine when everyone agrees with him. Can only counter with namecalling abuse when anyone doesn't. Typical form of communication for a dysfunctional adolescent.

I argued your point with logic, and now your sulking cause you realise you're a fool. Either argue it back or rack off - simple equation, one even a man with a limited capacity such as yourself should comprehend.

 

[celtic_pride]

I argued your point with logic, and now your sulking cause you realise you're a fool. Either argue it back or rack off - simple equation, one even a man with a limited capacity such as yourself should comprehend.

You are ranting like one of those Bible Bashers who yell out sermons from the bible on Bourke St corner every friday night.
All hyperbole and no one takes you seriously.

 

[rick James]

You are ranting like one of those Bible Bashers who yell out sermons from the bible on Bourke St corner every friday night.
All hyperbole and no one takes you seriously.

So you're saying you won't argue the point, but yet I'm ranting, even after I've presented my point - and neither you nor the saints bloke will argue back against it (therefore I assume you agree)?

That's pretty game.

 

[saintsrule]

I argued your point with logic, and now your sulking cause you realise you're a fool. Either argue it back or rack off - simple equation, one even a man with a limited capacity such as yourself should comprehend.

You are way off the mark in more ways than you think. Where was your logic? I pointed out that Melbourne doesn't have a young list and Richmond does, then you got all upset and defensive. Where am I sulking? You do counter with abuse when people don't agree with you as is evident in the post I've quoted. Thanks for demonstrating my point.

FWIW Bulldogs have easily the best group of young players within their list.

 

[corporal]

So you're saying you won't argue the point, but yet I'm ranting, even after I've presented my point - and neither you nor the saints bloke will argue back against it (therefore I assume you agree)?

That's pretty game.

So much anger young ricky

Yet a brilliant troll never the less, suck people in with a reasonable thread, then abuse them for commenting.

 

[HKW1]

Don't bother defending Melbournes young guns Dee's supporters.

We know how good they are now. But the key is for them to keep improving each game as they have done this year.

Who's kids are better than whose kids is a stupid argument. the key is turning a good kid into an out an out gun. Mclean is the only one who has done this what we need is two of the others to do the same

 

[rick James]

You are way off the mark in more ways than you think. Where was your logic? I pointed out that Melbourne doesn't have a young list and Richmond does, then you got all upset and defensive. Where am I sulking? You do counter with abuse when people don't agree with you as is evident in the post I've quoted. Thanks for demonstrating my point.

FWIW Bulldogs have easily the best group of young players within their list.

And the overall ages of lists has NOTHING to do with this thread, which I pointed out, and you haven't refuted at all. It's about groups, of youngsters. It's simple. Yet you can't grasp it.

I counter with abuse when confronted with pure idiocy, I apologise for upsetting you. Hope your feeling weren't hurt too much.

FWIW finally you at least show an opinion, that's great - explain why the bulldogs have the best youngsters on their list then. Remember, the thread title IS a question.

 

[rick James]

So much anger young ricky

Yet a brilliant troll never the less, suck people in with a reasonable thread, then abuse them for commenting.

I abuse only the stupid, jackass.

 

[celtic_pride]

I abuse only the stupid, jackass.

You must be a firm believer in self-mutilation then RJ

 

[saintsrule]

You must be a firm believer in self-mutilation then RJ

 

[rick James]

You must be a firm believer in self-mutilation then RJ

Awesome, I'm dealing with a guy so stupid that he busts out the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I" and he still has the gall to call me a child.

When you actually learn what a football looks like, get back to me. Until then, you're being awarded the official rick James "biggest dumbarse on bigfooty" award. You're the first non-moderator to recieve it to, you're among elite company.

 

[pacman]

RJ proving he is the biggest ****er on big footy!
Doesn't he hate it when he is wrong.

 

[AllStar7]

FWIW Bulldogs have easily the best group of young players within their list.

You only really know your own side's list.

You can say the Bulldogs have the best group of your players on their list, but do you know the players who haven't been getting a game?

It's simple, Melbourne's VFL affiliated side is Sandringham. Currently, Sandringham is second on the ladder (having won the previous two flags), and is being nicely helped by players such as Jones, Smith, Newton and Neaves.
Do you even know who Jones or Newton are? Probably not.

I don't know every youngster on every list, therefore I can only look at the sort of players we have on ours, and you can only do the same.

Fact is, Melbourne has a lot of young players that people don't actually classify as youngsters anymore. Rivers is only 22, as is Davey. Miller just turned 23, McLean, Sylvia and Chris Johnson are only 20. We have something like 8 or 9 players with less than 50 games under their belt, getting regular games IN A SIDE SITTING THIRD ON THE LADDER.

Everyone can claim that they have the best bunch of youngsters, but proof is in the pudding as they say.

 

[rick James]

RJ proving he is the biggest ****er on big footy!
Doesn't he hate it when he is wrong.

haha yeah doesn't he. guys, yeah he totally does guys, haha yeah. Will you be my friend? guys?

^that's you, loser.

 

[rick James]

You only really know your own side's list.

You can say the Bulldogs have the best group of your players on their list, but do you know the players who haven't been getting a game?

It's simple, Melbourne's VFL affiliated side is Sandringham. Currently, Sandringham is second on the ladder (having won the previous two flags), and is being nicely helped by players such as Jones, Smith, Newton and Neaves.
Do you even know who Jones or Newton are? Probably not.

I don't know every youngster on every list, therefore I can only look at the sort of players we have on ours, and you can only do the same.

Fact is, Melbourne has a lot of young players that people don't actually classify as youngsters anymore. Rivers is only 22, as is Davey. Miller just turned 23, McLean, Sylvia and Chris Johnson are only 20. We have something like 8 or 9 players with less than 50 games under their belt, getting regular games IN A SIDE SITTING THIRD ON THE LADDER.

Everyone can claim that they have the best bunch of youngsters, but proof is in the pudding as they say.

Precisely, but no, it must be a side that is sh*thouse, like hawthorn or carlton - because their fans need something to clin on to, the realisation that their list is still crap in SPITE of tanking, is just too much to bare.

 

[DG-Man]

Lot of biased views here!

Doggies have best young list in AFL. Comfortably. Will be all over Tigers and Demons next year with some talls back. Can't really see Demons in particular being able to compete with the top sides in future years. List is a little fragile and unlikely to improve IMO

 

[saintsrule]

rJ does calling other people stupid and idiots make you feel less of a stupid idiot?

Tell me how this argument can ever be an objective one. It always has to be subjective according to an individual's point of view. Subjectivity is not based on reason or logic and can't be proved, so there can never be such a thing as a definitive opinion.

So I suggest this thread will continue to go around in circles and you will continue to call people with differing opinions stupid.

 

[rick James]

Lot of biased views here!

Doggies have best young list in AFL. Comfortably. Will be all over Tigers and Demons next year with some talls back. Can't really see Demons in particular being able to compete with the top sides in future years. List is a little fragile and unlikely to improve IMO

you're talking next year, what about THIS year.

 

[AllStar7]

Lot of biased views here!

Doggies have best young list in AFL. Comfortably. Will be all over Tigers and Demons next year with some talls back. Can't really see Demons in particular being able to compete with the top sides in future years. List is a little fragile and unlikely to improve IMO

Not sure why I'd even waste my time trying to educate you.

Go watch Sandrigham play, then please return.
Also, while you're at it, tell me who at the Bulldogs will replace Grant, Johnson, Smith or West when they're gone. Thank you.

 

[rick James]

rJ does calling other people stupid and idiots make you feel less of a stupid idiot?

Tell me how this argument can ever be an objective one. It always has to be subjective according to an individual's point of view. Subjectivity is not based on reason or logic and can't be proved, so there can never be such a thing as a definitive opinion.

So I suggest this thread will continue to go around in circles and you will continue to call people with differing opinions stupid.

This argument doesn't need to be objective, but all subjective arguments should at least have a basis or rationale other than "Your so angry and hurt my feelings p.s. bulldogs better"

Act like a man for once. Have an opinion, and voice it.

 

[celtic_pride]

Awesome, I'm dealing with a guy so stupid that he busts out the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I" and he still has the gall to call me a child.

When you actually learn what a football looks like, get back to me. Until then, you're being awarded the official rick James "biggest dumbarse on bigfooty" award. You're the first non-moderator to recieve it to, you're among elite company.

What an honour ...
Thanks for the kudos.

 

[Jimi]

It's a good sign for the Dees when blokes like Jones (biggest nugget in the draft) and Smith (huge wraps) can't break into the side.

 

[DG-Man]

Not sure why I'd even waste my time trying to educate you.

Go watch Sandrigham play, then please return.
Also, while you're at it, tell me who at the Bulldogs will replace Grant, Johnson, Smith or West when they're gone. Thank you.

You don't need to educate me. By your logic, Carltons youngsters at the Bullants (on top of the ladder...just to educate you) must be awesome. Kennedy the next Wayne Carey, Sultana O'Hailphin the next Jimmy Stynes!
Demons list, including Sandy players looks pretty av to me. I think you will start a fairly rapid slide down the ladder in coming years. That kid Smith (highlighted him for you) is a hack. Saw him play for Sandy the other week. I think she sleeps with the light on!!

 

[AllStar7]

Demons list, including Sandy players looks pretty av to me. I think you will start a fairly rapid slide down the ladder in coming years. That kid Smith (highlighted him for you) is a hack. Saw him play for Sandy the other week. I think she sleeps with the light on!!

Guess we'll meet you at the bottom then