Tbh it really is when you look at that list of pick 5’s. Happy for you to even compare their underage stats to FOS and the other contenders
List Mgmt. “It’s a form of tanking” the Richmond rebuild
- Thread starter Strapping Young Lad
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Correct that you have pick no2.every season we have that “injured” star or two who could be anything bar injury.. they generally slip to pick 10-15 or if a real gun pick 6-7 for that reason. Not pick 1..
FOS is a very boring footballer.. but a good one. He is an Andrew brayshaw comparison. Well rounded player. Geelong was into him was the word at one point. But he isn’t an elite junior
Doesn't make any sense. You are saying pick 1 is likely to be the level of Cerra or Campbell. But Carlton traded pick 12 & 13 for pick 3. And North are happy to trade their F1(ev about pick 4-5) for picks in the teens. And clubs are lining up to offer the planet for any late rd 1 pick. But pick 1 only nets you Cerra or Campbell.
Another insecure cats fan. Take it to the bay, flog.
I'm sure his name is etched into your memory bank for eternity anyway
Wow, never heard him called boring before because bar perhaps Lalor, FOS has been pretty unanimously labelled the player with the most upside in the draft.
Is making the AA side in 2023 as an underage boring, (averaged 22 disposals as a 16-17 year old in the season)
Being the no.1 pick by most of draft watches coming into the season..Fox sports, But his VFL performance reminded on-lookers of his undeniable on-field class, to go with his explosive ball-winning capabilities. He’s not a big accumulator of the footy, but recruiters love his ability to change a game without having mass disposals.
I think he is elite enough for every other judge bar you.
Not going to get into another roundabout with you trying to explain why a club willing to part with pick 3 for picks 12 and 14 isn’t a good sign for the elite status of the top end of this draft. You don’t seem to possess the logic to comprehend that one.Doesn't make any sense. You are saying pick 1 is likely to be the level of Cerra or Campbell. But Carlton traded pick 12 & 13 for pick 3. And North are happy to trade their F1(ev about pick 4-5) for picks in the teens. And clubs are lining up to offer the planet for any late rd 1 pick. But pick 1 only nets you Cerra or Campbell.
And yes, cerra and cambell are about FOS level, I’d say cerra probably better.
- May 5, 2016
- 47,213
- 52,826
- AFL Club
- Geelong
As a fan of meaningfully defined arguments, well constructed sentences, in-depth analysis and research, and actual facts, you’ve hurt me a lot more than Richmond ever has or will.
Go and have another session on the couch about how many AA jackets Tom Stewart hasn’t actually won, or check in with the other 50,000 Tigers members in your group chat to see if your still-going petition to have Dangerfield retrospectively suspended for his hit on Vlastuin will get passed through the Senate in time for the start of Season 2025
Keep it coming China, this will be fun to look back at in future years.
But curious how you can't comprehend how a club willing to give up hugely sought after picks 12 & 13 to get pick 3 indicates top 3 picks are as valuable as ever.
Do you want to post FOS highlights?? It’s the least explosive highlights package you will ever see.
Agree. Pick 1 isn't as exciting as some other years, but it seems a really good draft to have half a dozen picks in the top 20 or so
SSSSSS
Brownlow Medallist
- Apr 18, 2011
- 22,219
- 51,305
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Six decades of domination
Hence the weird spot.
Same level of explosiveness yep
You mean their best players didn’t walk out due to a poor culture??
Uprecedented. But Richmond won't feel too strange about having their choice out of every player to nominate for the draft who is not tied to another club. When you essentially have 8 rd 1 selections then results from any individual selection matter less. The Tigers will just want & expect about 8 really good footballers from the next 3 drafts. Pick 1 2024 should be one of them.
- May 5, 2016
- 47,213
- 52,826
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Lucky a guy who isn’t in our best 22 and another who’s on its fringes didn’t impede us making the top 4. That’s a relief.
Your BigFooty highlight reel is maybe the only thing worse than theirs was this year.
- May 5, 2016
- 47,213
- 52,826
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Yeah I bet the powers that be sat down in the days after you towelled us up in 2020 and said ‘where do we want to be in four seasons’ time’ and a dozen hands shot up and said in unison “in 18th spot with most of our good players leaving.”
sabso
Random
- Aug 6, 2024
- 1,250
- 2,027
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Eng cricket, Leics CCC, Leicester Tigers
Used to it from this season. I think the only game we didn’t run out of gas was the Sydney game and Tom Lynch was fit in that one.
You know as Richmond supporter, you know what I wish we had
Pick 45, 57, 75, and the oldest list in the league, then we would be set.
Ah well, we will just have to make do with 1,6,10,11,18,20,23 and 24 In the strongest and deepest draft in recent memory
I like our chances, and again, sorry for hurting you.
Pick 45, 57, 75, and the oldest list in the league, then we would be set.
Ah well, we will just have to make do with 1,6,10,11,18,20,23 and 24 In the strongest and deepest draft in recent memory
I like our chances, and again, sorry for hurting you.
- May 5, 2016
- 47,213
- 52,826
- AFL Club
- Geelong
You know what I wish we had?
The oldest list in the league and those draft picks.
Because I can promise you, unless the Pies have inexplicably gotten younger than us despite Tom Hawkins, Zac Tuohy and Gary Rohan at an average age of 34 all leaving, we haven’t suddenly overtaken Collingwood.
You know what I wish you had?
Access to any sort of education that would enable you to fact check a solitary thing that you EVER post.
Similar threads
- Poll
