Robbie Gray or Lance Franklin (Detailed Analysis)

Remove this Banner Ad

Dec 28, 2007
1,330
0
Heaven
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Bendigo
I have gotten permission from Tarquin to create this thread so here it goes.
Now I have realised that the Franklin and Gray comparison has come out in various threads, so I thought that it deserved a thread for the time being. Okay, I will present some statistics and reasoning behind my thoughts. Let’s go.

Lance Franklin Vs Robbie Gray

Lance Franklin Profile:

Team: Hawthorn
Position: Forward
Number: 23
Birth date: 20th January 1987
Height: 196cm
Weight: 101kg
Recruited: Perth
Debut: 2005, Round 1 Vs Sydney
Games: 109
Games in 2009: 21
Goals: 323
Goals in 2009: 67
Dream team Price: $354,900
2009 Average: 80.8


Robbie Gray Profile:

Team: Port Adelaide
Position: Forward
Number: 17
Birth date: 30th March 1988
Height: 184cm
Weight: 88kg
Recruited: Oakleigh
Debut: 2007, Round 10 Vs Hawthorn
Games: 37
Games in 2009: 20
Goals: 52
Goals in 2009: 30
Dream team price: $321,200
2009 average: 73.1

Okay, time to get into the statistics:

The prices:

Lance Franklin is currently priced at $354,900 while Robbie Gray is priced at $321, 200 which is $33,700 less.

The DT averages:

Last year Lance Franklin averaged 80.8 points as opposed to Gray’s 73.1. Lance’s highest average is 96.4 while Gray’s is 73.1

The statistic averages:

Kicks: Buddy 8.9, Gray 7.8
Handball: Buddy 6.2, Gray 7.3
Marks: Buddy 5.2, 3.8
Goals: Buddy 3.2, Gray 1.5
Disposals: Buddy 15, Gray 16.2
Tackles: Buddy 2.3, Gray 3.1
FA: Buddy 1.9, Gray 0.8

So what do these statistics mean:

Not much. Buddy averaged these stats while playing in an average side. If Hawks improve this year, then his stats will go up. But this is not certain. Gray averaged these solid stats while playing as a small forward. So imagine what his stats will be like when he moves into the midfield. He averaged a lot more than this against a very good side in the dogs last weekend.

Experience:

Buddy has played 72 more games than Gray has. Buddy debuted and was drafted two years before Gray did.

Their position:

Lance Franklin plays mainly inside the forward 50 and is the Hawk’s focal point. Robbie Gray has played the first three years of his career as a small forward. But Robbie is going to be moved into the midfield for 2010 where he should rack it up. Buddy may push up the ground a little to get the ball, but not as much as Robbie. Okay, the problem that I have with Buddy is that as a forward, he must rely on midfielders to get the ball to him. With Hawthorn’s injury riddled midfield, will this lead to another average year for Buddy? Sewell and Taylor are big losses to the team. They now must rely mainly on Lewis and Mitchell to win the hard ball. Also with Taylor out, Roughead may have a few stints in the ruck which will give the opportunity for opposition teams to double team Franklin. Gray can play as an inside mid, outside mid, small forward and also on the wing. This will allow him to win the ball, tackle as well as kick goals. After all, he was drafted to be a goal kicking midfielder. On the weekend in his first week back, he proved that a move to the midfield is extremely beneficial to us coaches. He managed to accumulate 21 possessions, 5 tackles as well as 2 goals. The only thing that I am worried about is his handball to kick ratio.

Nab Cup form:

Lance Franklin score(s): 92 and 63. We are now waiting on his third score from fantasy freako (that’s if he did play?)
Robbie Gray: 83. He missed the first two Nab Cup matches. I know that he missed one due to club suspension but not sure about the other one.
So both have been in reasonable form over the pre-season and this hasn’t really helped us splitting the two.

Why it is hard to compare them:

We cannot really use statistics from the past because Gray is only now entering his break out years. Franklin has already proved what he can do particularly in 2008 where he averaged just less than 100 points a game.

Their negatives:

Buddy is now relying on an average looking midfield to deliver the ball to him which will decrease his scores. He will also miss round 1.
Gray is still young, unproven and has just shown glimpses of what he is capable of.

The draw and who will increase or decrease in price:

Lance Franklin:

Round 1 – Suspended
Round 2 – Geelong
Round 3 – Western Bulldogs
Round 4 – Collingwood
- Then his price will change.

Past Scores against these teams (in order from most recent):

Geelong: 118, 107, 48, 92

- When he scored 118 he destroyed Taylor in the first quarter so Scarlett went on to him before getting injured. Taylor was unable to go back on him because he was injured too so Mackie was forced to play on him.
- When he scored 107 it was still round 1 of 2009 so Hawks still had most of their guns playing. (Apparently kept quiet until last quarter)
- 48 was Grand final
- 92 he did a good job against Scarlett and Mackie.

Western Bulldogs: 63, 33, 116, 110
- Nab cup game two weeks ago was when he scored 63. He could of scored more but handballed too much. Pretty good job since he was playing on Lake.
- 33. Not really fair. If you remember this game, Dogs were winning by like 80 at half time.
- Back in 2008 when he scored 116 and 110. Very good supply. The 116 was in a final were he kicked 8 goals. But keep in mind, Hawks blitzed this game and Lake wasn’t as dominant as he is now. He also played on Morris for the majority of these games.

Collingwood: 106, 139, 146
- The 139 he played on Maxwell and O’Brien
- The 146 he played on N.Brown
- The 106 he played on Presti
- In all three games, Hawks smashed Collingwood. Can’t see it happening this time around.

Robbie Gray:

Round 1 – North Melbourne
Round 2 – West Coast
Round 3 – Brisbane
- Then his price will change

Past Scores against these teams (in order from most recent):

North Melbourne: 74, 74, 71
- Scored 74 in both games against North in 2009 and also lost by 5 points in both games. Was given the superman icon beside his name in his most recent game against them after having a huge last quarter. This was actually due to a move to the midfield
- The 71 was back in 2008 where he kicked three goals playing as a forward.

West Coast: 64, 45
- When he got 64 he was on fire early but then got injured with a patella tendon injury. Came back on later but couldn’t do much.
- Team got thrashed when he scored 45. He managed a goal and 14 possies as a small forward.

Brisbane: 95, 36
- He scored the 95 last year. Three goals and 18 possessions and played up the ground a little.
- 36 was back in 2007 so who cares.


So Buddy historically does well against the teams that he will play, but most of the time there was a reason behind it. Lake I believe will destroy him. If Hawks do good against Geelong, then so will he. Same against Collingwood

Gray is hard to judge because I believe this will be his break out year since he is moving into the midfield. But whenever he played there in previous years, he scored well.

Also, let’s take a look at the teams that they play and how many points they usually give to the opposition.

Buddy:

Western Bulldogs: Forwards usually don’t score well at all against them.
Geelong: Forward score average against them
Collingwood: Forwards score very badly against them

Gray:

North Melbourne: Concede an average amount of dt points to midfielders.
West Coast: Concede more than any club along with Fremantle to midfielders.
Brisbane: Difficult to score points against Brisbane in the midfield.

My Opinion:

I am still undecided. Franklin needs the Hawks to do well while Gray is unknown. I actually was extremely surprised with Franklin’s previous scores against teams. I just see his price falling even further after he plays the first three rounds. So I am thinking of getting him just before he plays North in round 5 or Essendon in round 6. Gray is very risky at his price. Didn’t know he was 88kg. He is a pretty big boy. Reminds me a lot of a young Ablett and that is why I like him and am too afraid to pass on him. He reads the ruck work so well and is extremely strong in the core. Tackles quite a bit too.
So I have presented the statistics, what do people think?

Things I didn't mention that viewers picked up:

- Franklin had an interrupter pre-season
- Gray had his appendix taken out
- Franklin got most of his points in the last quarter when he scored 107
- Lewis, Burgoyne, Rioli all out along with Sewell and Taylor
 
Isn't Lewis injured at the moment as well? You can add Burger and Rioli as well. Could be a slow start for the Hawks. Plus I don't think you made mention at all of Buddy's round 1 suspension or that he has had an interrupted pre-season (he had surgery of some sort didn't he?).

Gray missed the other game because of his appendix I think.

Good read though, still not sure where I stand on both these boys.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

just on round 1 2009, scarlett had him under control for the first 3 quarters, most of buddy's points came in the 4th after scarlett hurt himself

not trying to talk up scarlo, just thought it may be of interest
 
Isn't Lewis injured at the moment as well? You can add Burger and Rioli as well. Could be a slow start for the Hawks. Plus I don't think you made mention at all of Buddy's round 1 suspension or that he has had an interrupted pre-season (he had surgery of some sort didn't he?).

Gray missed the other game because of his appendix I think.

Good read though, still not sure where I stand on both these boys.

Yer I mentioned the suspension in the section where I look at the draw. I didn't know Franklin had an interrupter pre=season because I was overseas. Thanks for the info though.
 
always thought buddy was a lock but after reading this, im not so sure. now that i look at it, i can see him scoring in the 60's for the first few rounds. missing round one is also a huge negative.

gray looks the goods to me. he is at an iffy price but i believe there is a slight slight chance that he could become a keeper.
 
Yer I mentioned the suspension in the section where I look at the draw. I didn't know Franklin had an interrupter pre=season because I was overseas. Thanks for the info though.

Ah yep, my bad :thumbsu:

And yeah, I'm pretty sure he had surgery on an ankle or something just around/before Christmas. It probably isn't a major consideration as he is seemingly moving unabated now, but it might be worth taking into account.
 
Havent got any in my team at this stage...

If i was forced to choose one id go with Grey. Try not to select to many big marking forwards in my team. Generally prefer the smaller forwards who are rotated through the midfield with the exception of reiwoldt. After last season as well i just cant bring myself to select Franklin again. His scores were painful to watch! May have a closer look at Grey tho because if he gets more midfield time he could be very tempting.

Cheers for the writeup! Nice work
 
always thought buddy was a lock but after reading this, im not so sure. now that i look at it, i can see him scoring in the 60's for the first few rounds. missing round one is also a huge negative.

I would not be changing my mind based on this analysis - I would say it is more biased then details. A lot of subjective comments with little/no evidence to back them up.

For me the author seems to be able to discount anything good Buddy has done previously while excusing Gray for any misdeeds because he thinks this will be his 'break out year'.

Fairly shoddy analysis for mine - I will be taking Buddy and not Gray.
 
Gray for me.

Will start in the centre square every game with Boak and Cassisi.

Anyone not at least considering a midfielder who is priced at 320k available as a forward is either kidding themselves or overanalyzing things.
 
I would not be changing my mind based on this analysis - I would say it is more biased then details. A lot of subjective comments with little/no evidence to back them up.

For me the author seems to be able to discount anything good Buddy has done previously while excusing Gray for any misdeeds because he thinks this will be his 'break out year'.

Fairly shoddy analysis for mine - I will be taking Buddy and not Gray.

I wasn't biased. I currently have Buddy in my team anyway. I presented the facts and stated my opinion. You don't have to take my opinion into account, but take the statistics. What I was trying to say is that Franklin can't score weel uless Hawks play good because forwards need to midfielders to get the ball to them. Any midfielder that is named as a forward in dt must be watched closely.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I posted in another thread that I think Hawthorn will have a slow start to the year, although that doesn't necesarily mean Buddy wont score ok. Gray could be a good pickup but at that price he has to average at least 85 to be considered a good pickup and Im not sure about that yet...

At this stage I'm going with Bob Murphy but need to do more research on Gray. Pretty convinced that Buddy isn't the best option.
 
I wasn't biased. I currently have Buddy in my team anyway. I presented the facts and stated my opinion. You don't have to take my opinion into account, but take the statistics. What I was trying to say is that Franklin can't score weel uless Hawks play good because forwards need to midfielders to get the ball to them. Any midfielder that is named as a forward in dt must be watched closely.
But you present statistics like his previous scores against Collingwood (when he has killed it each time) and then suggest he won't be able to produce that because you don't expect the Hawks to smash Collingwood this time.

That is totally subjective and not very good statistical analysis in my book - what odds where the Hawks to beat Collingwood last time - I'm sure plenty of people thought they wouldn't beat them by the 40+ points they ended up winning by.

In fact the scores you have presented against previous opponents (for mine) suggest Franklin is the obvious choice.
 
The conclusion seems odd given that whole way through you seem to be downplaying Franklin and building up Gray.

I personally have both in my team at the moment, though Franklin is a worry because of his teammates at the moment.

The quality of opposition early is also a big worry.

Gray for me is a lock and whilst I hadn't seen or made the Ablett comparison before, I can certainly live with it. Don't think he quite has the creative aspect of Ablett but he certainly isn't bad in that regard and he matches up favourably in most other aspects. I think the only real concern in regards to Gray is injuries and I always worry about positional changes not actually happening. The big worry is how long K. Cornes stays as a forward if he struggles in that role because they are basically swapping positions to start the year.

I'm also intrigued by Cloke, Bate and Robert Murphy in that same price range.

Cloke struggled early last year after an interrupted pre-season, but once his fitness picked up and when Didak and Pendlebury got back into the team and fit he really started to score well. I think he basically has the same sort of review as you have done for Franklin. I think he will rely on the team playing well. At the same time, Cloke I think offers a little more consistency as he is a better mark and offers more from a tackling stand point, I think adding Jolly will kill his forwardline hitout chances. I'm not sure he has the upside of Franklin but I think he can be a guy who averages 90.

Murphy is a past proven scorer, 2nd year back from a knee(I believe?). Hall is going to cop any zoning off and the best defender, Hahn may be used as a backman where needed, Higgins and Gia both figure to get more midfield time and Johnson is surely going to suffer a bit from age and an interrupted preseason. I can see Murphy having a big season and also hitting the 90 or so average. At the same time I worry about consistency and that I am sort of relying on a lot of factors, though I am certainly confident of the two Hall related ones. I don't think he has the upside of any of the others but he also may be the safest.

Bate is just an interesting one who has some potential if Melbourne can show some improvement this year which surely they have to. Bate is as much on the theory that they have to kick the ball to someone when they go forward.
 
I think the only real concern in regards to Gray is injuries and I always worry about positional changes not actually happening. The big worry is how long K. Cornes stays as a forward if he struggles in that role because they are basically swapping positions to start the year.

I wouldn't overanalyze it. Gray is a lock to play midfield all year despite whatever Kane is doing. He is the future and Williams knows that.

Kane will get dropped before he takes Gray's position in the midfield ;)
 
Gray for me.

Will start in the centre square every game with Boak and Cassisi.

Anyone not at least considering a midfielder who is priced at 320k available as a forward is either kidding themselves or overanalyzing things.

This.

A move to the midfield is the darling of all player breakouts. Any time it happens, it needs to be analysed closely.
 
Was Higgins fool's gold last year?

I would think that if you look back over the last decade there is a player who fits the small forward to midfielder breakout, it is a case of finding them. Ablett is another example.

Gray is alot different situation than higgins. Higgins was 220k last year and Gray is 330K.. so your outlaying alot for a player that may of may not end up being a keeper.. too much in my book.. rather take that sort of risk with a Matty Campbell, Ziebell, Dangerfield, ballantyne.. etc who at very least will make money and faciltate a upgrade to a keeper potentially. These players should score simliar to gray..
 
Isn't Lewis injured at the moment as well? You can add Burger and Rioli as well. Could be a slow start for the Hawks. Plus I don't think you made mention at all of Buddy's round 1 suspension or that he has had an interrupted pre-season (he had surgery of some sort didn't he?).

Gray missed the other game because of his appendix I think.

Good read though, still not sure where I stand on both these boys.

Lewis is named to play against Brisbane tomorrow:thumbsu:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Robbie Gray or Lance Franklin (Detailed Analysis)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top