The Warlord
RuSsIa iS BaD
- Aug 21, 2018
- 32,436
- 81,737
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Warlord lives for boring political debate.
Heh, keeps me in the style to which I've become accustomed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Warlord lives for boring political debate.
I just paid ( for the first time) a land tax on my unit. Part of the Covid Debt repayment plan. Glad I could help out the Vic Gov. pity they can’t fix the potholes in my road
LOL, you mean ten events that may or may not go ahead in Glasgow
C'mon Mate. It is only money. We can simply borrow some more. Because Government Debt doesn't matter and means nothing. But strangely Land Tax and Payroll Tax have been increased. Not sure why. But apparently nothing to do with Debt because Government Debt doesn't matter. :stern lookWe Victorian taxayers will be so gratified if it doesn't go ahead but we still have to pay over $500,000,000 because of abject incompetence.
Yep, my understanding is we're very happy about that too.
The big challenge for our club to receive development funding for Arden St is that the only alternative to Labor in this state is a Greens and Teals and independents coalition and they aren't going to let us cut down the trees to build a covered grandstand.
Nah.
Firstly, this notion that Greens/Teals would block development because of a few trees is something straight out of the Murdoch playbook. That's just not based in reality really. The broader Arden St Precinct plan involves the expansion of open/accessible green space, not a reduction. It would be supported politically by the Greens/Teals in your hypothetical as it aligns with their Planning policies.
Secondly, any covered grandstand going up at Arden St would almost certainly go where the current outdoor soccer pitch is, meaning the removal of existing established trees would be minimal;
View attachment 2135245
The club is very happy that one of the single largest, non-nuclear power station construction projects ever to be greenlit on earth, which was to provide 10's of thousands of jobs, local amenities and further residential and accommodation development is no longer being built a few hundred meters from the football ground?
Considering they have just built a a multi billion dollar train station in preparation for it's existence?
That is certainly the biggest of long bows, even for you.
The club should be worried how the government are currently scheming to make their current sunk costs feasible for what is billions of dollars of rail track to an industrial area in the middle of nowhere with no meaningful use.
The Arden development is not even a crumb on the sole of the shoe of this master plan and will be cast aside at will if required. In fact so will the Oval's presence at all if it means fulfilling the requirements of that train station now.
I pray those at the club are not that stupid regarding the potential ramifications of the canning of the RMH/RWH.
Arden St is an extremely easy target in a major development corridor. Certainly far easier than other relatively inner city training facilities like Punt Rd, Olympic Park, Princess Park, Whitten Oval, (even consider Junction Oval) which have had 5-6 x the public funding sunk into it in the last 10 years which have future proofed it.
I'll feel more comfortable when I see a little more than a bullshit master plan with no funding model, no fleshed out details, no dates and really very little traction in 4-5 years.
REAL projects of this nature get announced and done. Quickly. Especially one's heavily based on civil and soft landscapes (the acquisitions aside)
Nah.
Firstly, this notion that Greens/Teals would block development because of a few trees is something straight out of the Murdoch playbook. That's just not based in reality really.
The broader Arden St Precinct plan involves the expansion of open/accessible green space, not a reduction. It would be supported politically by the Greens/Teals in your hypothetical as it aligns with their Planning policies.
Secondly, any covered grandstand going up at Arden St would almost certainly go where the current outdoor soccer pitch is, meaning the removal of existing established trees would be minimal;
View attachment 2135245
We Victorian taxayers will be so gratified if it doesn't go ahead but we still have to pay over $500,000,000 because of abject incompetence.
C'mon Mate. It is only money. We can simply borrow some more.
Because Government Debt doesn't matter and means nothing.
But strangely Land Tax and Payroll Tax have been increased. Not sure why.
But apparently nothing to do with Debt because Government Debt doesn't matter. :stern look
LOL. You are clueless if you think Government Debt has no impact on your life. :stern lookYes, we can. It's how government works. Grown ups understand this. The issue is only if you struggle to service the debt, which Victoria is not.
It has precisely zero impact on your life lol.
Because there was a planet wide natural disaster that hit Victoria hard in 2020, that's why.
Again, grown ups with real world experience understand this.
The people flocking to move to Victoria, both from interstate and overseas aren't too worried about it are they.
Only people who delude themselves it does matter to their lives are sad weirdos.
Your response will no doubt be some ugly sledge about my mental health, or the fact I had enjoyable social life in my 20s and that's fine btw, play on.
All it does is demonstrate you have absolutely no argument beyond bleating gOvErNmEnT dEbT like some offcut from a Kennett/Neil Mitchell recording in 1994.
Wait until you hear about the $386 billion we're spending on submarines that will never happen.
They should never have agreed to host the 2026 games, it was a dumb decision, but the Commonwealth Games are dead as a concept, at least they pulled out before pouring MORE cash down that hole.
Two minutes on google shows that this is hyperbole.
But it's a convenient deflection to enable holding the Dan-can-do-no-wrong position
and never letting go (you're not the only one who runs with it).
https://www.ussc.edu.au/does-aukus-pillar-i-provide-capability-bang-for-buck
Australia overpaid French shipbuilder Naval Group hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation as Anthony Albanese focuses on the bigger strategic picture of rebuilding ties with France to address the challenge China poses to the Pacific order.
The $835 million settlement with Naval Group for the dumped $90 billion French submarine program is expected to pave the way for enhanced defence and security links between Canberra and Paris, according to defence sources.
Yes, you've said it before, and I've said before that we're the only state that paid half a billion plus to avoid the supposed extra costs (that hole).
And if these extra costs are so apparent, how the f**k did Victorian bureaucrats not know it before signing a contract with a ridiculous break penalty included? As I said, abject incompetence. And that's probably an understatement.
Yes, because it means that WE will be the major institution in the area. If the hospital was there it would be the hospital precinct.
Also, I think you misunderstand the situation. Just because the hospital stuff is not happening doesn't mean the whole area is being left vacant lol.
They're not filling the metro tunnel in ffs, it'll be housing and retail. And we will be the anchor there.
Not that difficult of a concept to grasp, even for you.
Wow, you've gone and made up a scenario where Arden Street itself is being dug up lololololol.
Amazing stuff.
LOL. You are clueless if you think Government Debt has no impact on your life. :stern look
Learnings in this thread from BRANE GENUISES:
* Governments should not have debt, they should save up their pocket money and build infrastructure, same as how normal people don't get into debt, everyone buys houses for cash.
* When a Victorian Government does something, it is uniquely bad, and a worse mistake committed by another level of government is actually OK, just ask the people benefiting financially from that mistake, they approve of it.
Right ...
Dan Andrews isn't Premier and hasn't been for over a year, I deal in facts.
Ah yes, the United States Studies Centre - funded by the US Government - thinks a deal where Australian taxpayers pay hundreds of billions to subsidise the US defence industry is a good deal.
Well, that settles the matter lol.
Australia paid France millions more than necessary for cancelling subs
Australia overpaid French shipbuilder Naval Group hundreds of millions in compensation, but the bigger picture is rebuilding alliances to tackle China.www.afr.com
Given we paid MORE to break the deal with France over the subs than the Commonwealth Games, shouldn't you vbe even more enraged about that lol?
Yeah, it was a shit decision in retrospect, I'm not hanging an entire government that's been in power for ten years over it.
Especially when the alternative is a rabble obsessed with looking in children's underpants and is currently tearing itself apart in court ... again.
As we saw above, you think AUKUS is a good deal despite having to pay the French $800m plus for nothing, perhaps mon aimi, ze consistency in your sinking is not 'ow you say, complete?
Governments make mistakes, so do list managers. Its called the real world.
LOL. You are clueless if you think Government Debt has no impact on your life. :stern look
Debt is OK to a point. It is when debt blows out that it has consequences. Be it to the individual or business or even a State. Like I said Clueless. :stern lookWell, it is used to fund the infrastructure and services that make living in Victoria one of the highest standards of living in the world.
Indeed, we have such a high standard of living that we can manage to run a society that copes with simpletons that repeatedly fall off their bikes as grown adults then require extensive health care to return them back to the bike.
We are arguing with someone who frequently microdoses himself to the eyeballs down at Treasury Gardens. :stern lookWhat are you talking about? apart from currency strength, public/private investment levels, unemployment %'s, inflation and increased taxation - When has government debt ever REALLY mattered?
Sorry.... I think I just finished laughing.
I never said the site is being vacant, the fact you can't identify the risk now involved at this level of planning shows how wet you are behind the ears of such things.
Stick to foreign affairs and the Russian cheerleading.