No emergency? Surely you dont have 3 players missing from your forward line in round 1
Round 1 Live Game Chat/Team discussion
- Thread starter BigVic
- Start date
- Tagged users None
No emergency? Surely you dont have 3 players missing from your forward line in round 1
859 for 11 before today 
722 for 7 today
1581 for 18 now
Goddard, Cox, Lake, Ebert and McCarthy tomorrow
Should get to 2000 and par.
722 for 7 today
1581 for 18 now
Goddard, Cox, Lake, Ebert and McCarthy tomorrow
Should get to 2000 and par.
Im 2017/20 goddard, lake and redden(port adelaide) to come
Unrivaled Mach
Cancelled
1745 with Boyd, Hargrave, McEvoy and Redden to come. Bugg and Magner on the bench so can't complain. Well done to those who look like getting huge scores.
1775 with Dixon, Cox and Goddard left. Pretty average start to the year. Besides starting the wrong rookies, HMac is looking like my biggest mistake.
Schulzenfest
TheBrownDog
CrozaN said:
Had him for most of the pre-season until I found the cash to upgrade him to Swan. Early days, but I'm starting to think that might've been a bit of a waste of money.
Swan will outdo him over the year. If I remember correctly, although Stanton can score big he is also prone to putting in the odd shocker.
Hardly, take out the game he got injured and the game he returned, his lowest score was 75. From rounds 13 onwards his lowest score was 93 and 98, the rest were over 100.
He is only going to improve this year with more help in the midfield, that is one reason why i picked him because i see upside to his game and the fact that only 1.2% of teams have him
.Will probably make him my captain next week against Port, he should dominate yet again!
Schulzenfest
TheBrownDog
JuddyBuddy said:
Probably, but if Stanton averages 115 or so (achievable IMO, especially after tonight) and Swan averages 120 or so again I would've rather had the extra 70k, especially as Stanton would be a POD.
1864 with Boyd, Lake and Waters to play. I would be massively stoked with 2150, but 2100 is probably more likely.
Not the ideal start to the year. 1705 with Goddard, Boyd, Cox and Hargrave to go. I'll be doing somersaults of I pulled out 2100
Just realised that Gray was out, which means I get Kennedy's score.
1832 with 4 to go - great start but would be oh so much better had I had Bugg and Mcdonald on for Ellis and Shiels.
1832 with 4 to go - great start but would be oh so much better had I had Bugg and Mcdonald on for Ellis and Shiels.
Just realised that Gray was out, which means I get Kennedy's score.
1832 with 4 to go - great start but would be oh so much better had I had Bugg and Mcdonald on for Ellis and Shiels.
im 1830 with 4 to go, who u got left?
He averaged 118 in the second half of 2011 - the fourth highest of any player in the league.
Very happy with my selection of him after round one.
Goddard, Hayes, Lake and Hargrave.
Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 139,972
- 162,869
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
1576/17
Not great, too many shit scores below 70. I'm now relying on Lake, Hayes, Goddard, McEvoy and Riewoldt to get me over 2000 tomorrow.
Not great, too many shit scores below 70. I'm now relying on Lake, Hayes, Goddard, McEvoy and Riewoldt to get me over 2000 tomorrow.
1903 with 4 left to play Lake, Boyd, then Smith and Dickson. Hope those rookies do me proud. Bit disappointed about Broughton. Ah well 1st week. Fix up my rookies and perhaps see if the Hale + Golby experiment works better in round 2. If not good bye Hale and Goldby hello Premium backline.
1866/20
Heppell (to a small extent), Broughton, Hall (55 isn't too bad but hoping he would push 65),Coniglio, Ellis hurt me this week particularly since Clarke and Magner were on my bench. Overall, I'm not too unhappy though, at least I chose Ablett as my captain over Swanny.
Boyd, Goddard and Hargrave to play. 2100 would be solid-ish.
EDIT: Just read back over the last couple of pages, seems 2100+ would be a pretty decent round 1 score.
Fairly happy now, although it is incredibly early I wish I had picked Hanley in my backline for POD. He made my SC but just couldn't fit him into DT and that is probably my biggest regret at the moment (Also wish I could have fit Rocky in but my midfield is good enough as is)
Heppell (to a small extent), Broughton, Hall (55 isn't too bad but hoping he would push 65),Coniglio, Ellis hurt me this week particularly since Clarke and Magner were on my bench. Overall, I'm not too unhappy though, at least I chose Ablett as my captain over Swanny.
Boyd, Goddard and Hargrave to play. 2100 would be solid-ish.
EDIT: Just read back over the last couple of pages, seems 2100+ would be a pretty decent round 1 score.
Fairly happy now, although it is incredibly early I wish I had picked Hanley in my backline for POD. He made my SC but just couldn't fit him into DT and that is probably my biggest regret at the moment (Also wish I could have fit Rocky in but my midfield is good enough as is
)
1561/17 with Goddard, Hargrave, Cox, Redden, Nick Riewoldt and Dickson all still to play.
Anywhere 2000+ I'd be happy with considering all my best scoring rookies were on my bench and I had Shiel, Coniglio and Ellis on the field.
Broughton over Adcock/Hanley the only decision I'm not happy with.
Anywhere 2000+ I'd be happy with considering all my best scoring rookies were on my bench and I had Shiel, Coniglio and Ellis on the field.
Broughton over Adcock/Hanley the only decision I'm not happy with.
TheHopeless
Rookie
2276/22
Heppel and Shaw let me down with 71 and 56.
Magner was on pine, Had Caddy on the field.
M. Clarke and Shaw the only sub 70 scores on my team.
Heppel and Shaw let me down with 71 and 56.
Magner was on pine, Had Caddy on the field.
M. Clarke and Shaw the only sub 70 scores on my team.
