guero
rock my world
Oliver, Parish and Mills are the 3 mid rookies with the best JS and they're all playing fantasy-friendly roles. If I was you those are the 3 I'd hold.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Round 3 Trades
- Thread starter doona
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
guero
rock my world
Better than any other first year mid bar Parish and Mills.
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
No he is saying he swapped Kerridge into the fwds for Barlow with some DPP action
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
Yep what everyone else said. Taking advantage of the DP option.
Oh why did I buy in to the Harwood hype. At least my backline now reads Shaw, Houli, Johan, Laird, Lonergan & Adams
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
i was already committed to Rockliff -> Parish so Papley might have to slide through to the keeper
Ruggles has been promoted from the rookie list and is a better alternative to Hartley imo (if he plays) so i'll go with option2
hopefully Howe comes good (apparently he attended 10 center bounces vs WCE)
So, I'm completely stuck on trades this week.
I've got critical issues with 3 players - Rockliff, Steele & Macaffer. I want to get Parish into my midfield as a downgrade. I also need to trade Rocky this week.
I'm thinking the best option this week is to trade Macaffer, instead of Steele, as if I traded Steele to Parish I'd be losing my mid/fwd link to do it. It's better for balance.
Macaffer > Parish.
That trade leaves me with a massive 13,400 left
This is where I need help. I've come up with 3 rookies in the midfield + rocky, so I want to replace Rocky with another premium midfielder. and I'd like to know which one you think is best.
Option 1
Rocky > T Mitchell
Leaves me with 2k
Option 2
Rocky > Ablett
Leaves me with 73k
- Probably my preferred option as I'm currently fielding 3 options in the midfield and I have a lack of premium midfielders having opted for midfielders in Viney and Hunter
Option 3
Rocky > Johannisen via Rosa into mids.
Leaves me with 173k
- Creates a potential future DEF - MID link for my team and frees up a lot of cash, meaning I have a link between FWD - MID, DEF - FWD & MID - DEF
Any thoughts? Definitely struggling a bit with this one. Any advice at all would be appreciated.
I've attached a screenshot of my team after the Macaffer trade. I also have Robinson and Rosa riding the pine, but I'm committed to holding them
I've got critical issues with 3 players - Rockliff, Steele & Macaffer. I want to get Parish into my midfield as a downgrade. I also need to trade Rocky this week.
I'm thinking the best option this week is to trade Macaffer, instead of Steele, as if I traded Steele to Parish I'd be losing my mid/fwd link to do it. It's better for balance.
Macaffer > Parish.
That trade leaves me with a massive 13,400 left
This is where I need help. I've come up with 3 rookies in the midfield + rocky, so I want to replace Rocky with another premium midfielder. and I'd like to know which one you think is best.
Option 1
Rocky > T Mitchell
Leaves me with 2k
Option 2
Rocky > Ablett
Leaves me with 73k
- Probably my preferred option as I'm currently fielding 3 options in the midfield and I have a lack of premium midfielders having opted for midfielders in Viney and Hunter
Option 3
Rocky > Johannisen via Rosa into mids.
Leaves me with 173k
- Creates a potential future DEF - MID link for my team and frees up a lot of cash, meaning I have a link between FWD - MID, DEF - FWD & MID - DEF
Any thoughts? Definitely struggling a bit with this one. Any advice at all would be appreciated.
I've attached a screenshot of my team after the Macaffer trade. I also have Robinson and Rosa riding the pine, but I'm committed to holding them
Quite the conundrum.
All are viable options. (1) and (2) are really a toss up as to who you think will do better over the next 5 or 6 games, as you should be aiming to end up with both. Price changes also come into it - I think Tom Mitchell's breakeven is lower than GAJ's. While option (3) gives you neither of these gun mids, it does give you cash and a point of difference (at least for a little while) in JJ. That cash may prove crucial given the donuts riding your bench.
It it were me, I'd bring in T Mitchell.
I'd go Titch, he looks like he could become unreachable over the next few weeks.
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
Define 'unreachable'.
Only if you haven't planned properly to have enough cash for any contingency.
How much cash you got in the kitty?
Sometimes the decisions are made for us when rookies under perform/get injured and the must have premo mid smashes the first 10 rounds with a 130+ avg, are you expecting your rookies to have made enough cash by round 5 or 6 to reach him at 650k? What about 700k by round 10?
Of course this is all theoretical and Horse could change his role again, that's why he 'looks like' he could be unreachable.
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
Depend on trades, max of 390k floor of about 310-320k
So essentially you're downgrading now to catch him slightly earlier than everyone else would like to, assuming he's on your radar at all, but I have a feeling this is a forced Rocky trade
. Why not jump on before any price rises? I'm assuming you don't want to miss Parish...
