Round 9 Discussion

[Yellow Feathers]

After a long 3 day break, round 9 kicks off tonight with Adelaide Vs Collingwood.

I've got:

Beams (VC loophole)
Pendlebury
Wright

(Charlie Cameron on the bench)

 

[CaptScott]

Woohoo, looking forward to having some coverage this round. Hope to get a few sub-50's just so I can cross them off.

For me:

Pendles (VC)
Beams
Danger
Crouch
Jacobs

 

[Anzac16]

Should be some big scores this week with not a whole lot of popular premiums missing.

Beams (VC)
Pendlebury
Langdon
Jacobs
Jaensch

 

[CJApples87]

Beams, Swan (VC) and Langdon for me tonight. Thought about getting Pendles in, but I've gone for Stevie J instead.

 

[LordHaart]

Should be some big scores this week with not a whole lot of popular premiums missing.

Beams (VC)
Pendlebury
Langdon
Jacobs
Jaensch

I traded out Jaensch last week, I thought about bringing him back now since his price hasn't changed and he's been one of my more solid backline players. However, his BE is something like 144 after his score of 45 in round 7 so I think I'll wait for his BE (and price) to drop before I bring him back.

 

[Crawb]

Tonight: Real
Beams (VC)
Dangerfield
Cloke
Langdon
Crouch (sub...)

 

[doona]

I traded out Jaensch last week, I thought about bringing him back now since his price hasn't changed and he's been one of my more solid backline players. However, his BE is something like 144 after his score of 45 in round 7 so I think I'll wait for his BE (and price) to drop before I bring him back.

I traded him out for McVeigh. It payed last week. I reckon ill bring in Bartell before I get back Jaensch and keep an eye on other players. He is not a must have. I made a few 100k so I am happy

For me:
Langdon
Beams (VC)
Jacobs
Dangerfield
Cameron

 

[doona]

After a long 3 day break, round 9 kicks off tonight with Adelaide Vs Collingwood.

I've got:

Beams (VC loophole)
Pendlebury
Wright

(Charlie Cameron on the bench)

why a bench player in the bye rounds. bad trading (except for rucks, f'n rucks)

 

[doona]

note: How good is it AFL Fantasy finally has history and your trade history

 

[Scrotes2000]

Beams
Pendlebury
Swan
Langdon
Jacobs
Dangerfield

 

[Torz]

Only one orange dot this round. Woo!

Plenty in tonight's game:

Swan
Pendles
Beams
Langdon
Wright
Danger
Cameron

 

[bombermick]

Langdon
Pendles
Swan
Sauce
Dangerfield
Cameron

Need a big night. Thank goodness Cameron isn't the sub.

 

[Forward Press]

Still a long way to go, both in the game and the season, but Tom Langdon must be putting up a strong claim to be a backline keeper.

 

[Torz]

Still a long way to go, both in the game and the season, but Tom Langdon must be putting up a strong claim to be a backline keeper.

The man is everywhere at the moment. He's like a rich mans Maxwell - playing loose.

 

[Forward Press]

The man is everywhere at the moment. He's like a rich mans Maxwell - playing loose.

More importantly, averaging 75 so far but given what I saw in the past couple of weeks he's seeing a lot of the uncontested ball, and he has a chance at pushing it up into backline keeper numbers and looks like being in no danger of a sub any time soon.

The question is how long he can sustain it.

 

[Hate]

Beams on a bloody rampage right now. Need SJ to go huge if Beams does or I'll cry after just trading Beams > Ward on bye round and then Ward > SJ

 

[Blue and Gold Blood]

where is Swan? Fanfooty isnt working so no idea whats happening

 

[Hate]

where is Swan? Fanfooty isnt working so no idea whats happening

Not getting anywhere near the ball. Has had one good play so far. As I type this Swan takes a mark.

Was at 20 at QTR time

 

[doona]

BEAMS VC

 

[Blue and Gold Blood]

BEAMS VC

i chose Swan Should have stuck with Beams like i have all season

 

[Torz]

More importantly, averaging 75 so far but given what I saw in the past couple of weeks he's seeing a lot of the uncontested ball, and he has a chance at pushing it up into backline keeper numbers and looks like being in no danger of a sub any time soon.

The question is how long he can sustain it.

Beaten his average in a half. That is some sort of beast mode.

 

[4evablues]

How good is Langdon scoring? Should have made him captain

 

[4evablues]

Went with Pendles for captain.

 

[Blue and Gold Blood]

Went with Pendles for captain.

didnt want to try the loophole with vice captain?

 

[lion4life]

Went Swan for the loophole in RDT, Beams in Fantasy. Bit meh, meh VC wise. Will probably bank it if scores above 125

At HT in fantasy

Langdon - 79
Beams - 69 (VC)
Jacobs - 54
Dangerfield - 48

At HT in RDT (ie the one that matters)

Langdon - 79
Beams - 69
Swan - 56 (VC)
Dangerfield - 48