
legal advice to list him as injured? sure
How would you list him?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Supercoach Round 6 SC Talk - SC Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 6 AF Talk - AF Trades
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
legal advice to list him as injured? sure
I wouldn't, its an injury listHow would you list him?
I wouldn't, its an injury list
I wouldn't, its an injury list
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
if Elijah said finger injury I would say the same thing, and JUH isn't listedIt’s not just that though, it includes suspended players. Just scrolling through it and there’s also a 4-5 week ‘managed’ and Elijah Hollands ‘personal reasons’. So the purity of your injury list is long gone, anything else bothering you?
it was listed as suspension, so an accurate representationYou understand that Melbourne had Joel Smith on the injury list all of last year and I'm pretty sure he wasn't injured...
The allegations are on Victoria Law Courts WebsiteOh humour, I get it now, sorry. Still interested as to whether the form of the allegation is out there. B
if Elijah said finger injury I would say the same thing, and JUH isn't listed
I wonder technically... if he stays on the " long term injury list" will Geelong get to use that to get a MSD pick if they want to use it?
The allegations are on Victoria Law Courts Website
Court list?How would you list him?
I can see itThey're not on the mag listing.
Now that every man and his dog has seen the court listing, listing him as out injured is pointless anyway so they may as well have him down as 'managed' now.
And honestly, which AFL journo is going to ask what 'managed' means in his case as they would be well aware its a no go zone.
Now that every man and his dog has seen the court listing, listing him as out injured is pointless anyway so they may as well have him down as 'managed' now.
And honestly, which AFL journo is going to ask what 'managed' means in his case as they would be well aware its a no go zone.
if only you were this angry towards your own club, if someone replies im going to reply back, that's usually what people do on forums
It's clearly cerulean
Oh, they've dived into it. They're just stopped from publishing. As soon as they're allowed...Exactly. Journalists even asking the question could be found in contempt of court, so they are not going to ask.
The morons that think journalists will dive into this story further to risk being in contempt are absolute nuffies.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Oh, they've dived into it. They're just stopped from publishing. As soon as they're allowed...
Are you confusing the actual allegations with the court date appearance? The allegations aren't listed, it's just that person x has a court date on xyz date, as well as some other information unrelated to what the allegations or charges are?I can see it
They all have very long articles in draft form saved to their hard drives and backup USBs for the moment it's called...Oh, they've dived into it. They're just stopped from publishing. As soon as they're allowed...
They all have very long articles in draft form saved to their hard drives and backup USBs for the moment it's called...
Yes i am sorryAre you confusing the actual allegations with the court date appearance? The allegations aren't listed, it's just that person x has a court date on xyz date, as well as some other information unrelated to what the allegations or charges are?
Absolutely.