There was a rumor mill before the suppression order anyway
Rumour Rumors of cat player in big trouble
- Thread starter Roogene
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Sep 26, 2017
- 29,862
- 51,355
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Really bruh? That’s unreal bruh…you’re so cool bruh
- Mar 4, 2015
- 2,997
- 3,692
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Central District
Now that every man and his dog has seen the court listing, listing him as out injured is pointless anyway so they may as well have him down as 'managed' now.
And honestly, which AFL journo is going to ask what 'managed' means in his case as they would be well aware its a no go zone.
And honestly, which AFL journo is going to ask what 'managed' means in his case as they would be well aware its a no go zone.
Not to anything like the same extent.
Before the court listing, even the Geelong board was arguing over whether it might even be a non-Geelong player.
Plausible deniability does matter. It also matters for people like the parents of the accused, who tend to suffer enormous blowback
You do realise I was using that posters language
Last edited by a moderator:
That’s better than fake finger, also I wouldn’t say anything and I wouldn’t list him on anything, if anyone asks which they won’t the response should be he’s unavailable to me or conversation
- Sep 26, 2017
- 29,862
- 51,355
- AFL Club
- Geelong
That’s nice Bruh
Thanks bruh
He may well have, but I doubt it if you read a few posts earlier it was already addressed
Can I say 100% no of course not, but I’m allowed to call BS if I think it’s BS
And if it is a legit injury what will happen when it’s better ? They take him off and do exactly what I’m saying or keep him on there with fake injury ?
I didn’t realise you need to be in a certain position to have an opinion, what’s next have to be an afl player to talk about afl
such a strange hill to die on...
Yes- sounds reasonable except for the bit about ‘supporters are not stupid.’
Oh for god's sake. Pages and pages of the same shit said over and over again. Your biggest concern on a thread concerning an alleged sexual assault, is whether a club lied about a finger injury or not.
Same shit repeated over and over, with no acknowledgement of what is being said, or why it might be the case. Not acknowledging that maybe there's bigger factors at play, or that you may have got this wrong. Just obsessing over 'oh but they're lying about the finger.'
Clubs lie about injuries all the time. Even if they have, as I've explained to you and multiple other idiots, it's better than drawing further attention to it by 'managing' him...or actually saying why and violating a suppression order relating to rape, sexual assault and .
But sure, keep going on and onnn about the same thing with the same argument, because it's oh so important in the scheme of things. 28 posts on 'the finger.' At what point are you just going to shut up and move on with your life?
People have tolerated your shit for pages on end, but you don't listen and you just keep trolling away. There's Richmond posters that are actively refuting you, and yet you still think you're right and you have a point. It's goddamn pathetic.
Just leave already, if you don't have anything new to say regarding the actual case, and the actual issues at hand. Not complete whataboutism that isn't even certified - given there is plausible deniability, because Bruhn was wearing a splint on his finger.
Seriously give it a ****ing rest. You are exhausting.
if only you were this angry towards your own club, if someone replies im going to reply back, that's usually what people do on forums
No-one's defending the club, they're just trying to make you see sense - of which you clearly have none. There are bigger issues at play here, and he did have his finger strapped during the practice match:
You can moan all you like, there's still photo evidence and plausible deniability. As I and others have tried drilling into your dense head though, this is not the key issue on this thread, and has little bearing on the actual matters at hand. If the club is lying, like all other clubs including your own do, it'll mean a fine. If it isn't, then no fine and they're telling the truth. Either way, you have no idea and you need to stop pretending like you do - or that it even matters.
You can moan all you like, there's still photo evidence and plausible deniability. As I and others have tried drilling into your dense head though, this is not the key issue on this thread, and has little bearing on the actual matters at hand. If the club is lying, like all other clubs including your own do, it'll mean a fine. If it isn't, then no fine and they're telling the truth. Either way, you have no idea and you need to stop pretending like you do - or that it even matters.
Last edited by a moderator:
T2B_
The Avo King
- Feb 13, 2011
- 56,018
- 95,967
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Tasmania Devils, Dragons FFC
Dude (or bruh, whichever you prefer), your team are the reigning premiers, not sure why you're having a conniption over how a player is listed, but it seems you're obsessed with Geelong somehow, bit like some of the Richmond fans.
must be obsessed with Geelong, only thread I can ever recall posting in about a Geelong player, I made 1 comment about not needing to lie about an injury, somehow im obsessed
let me spell it out......theres no need to list him as injured..........none.........zero and for the ones that say oh yeah but what if he is, sure you believe that and then what happens when its better? bet hes still listed as injured
- Sep 27, 2024
- 448
- 719
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Everyone please stop engaging him.
Similar threads
