Unofficial Preview Sack Hinkley 2: Septic Portaloo

Part 2?? Why hasn’t Ken been sacked yet???


  • Total voters
    200

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe I have misinterpreted Benny D's comment that only something like 3,500 members returned the recent survey, (or is that figure for those who voiced their dissatisfaction?), but either way if it's anywhere near correct there are either a lot more happy clappers out there than I imagined, or there are a lot of lazy campaigners who complain, but then are happy to sit back and let others do the heavy lifting.
It's a lie. There's thousands more. I don't know why people are shocked quite frankly. We exist to exist. We are a franchise now.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

lol - as if they'd act any differently if Alyx used his real name.

The petty semantics of online correspondence a solid 20ish years after the internet became ubiquitous.

“Contact me via Twitter = GFY”

“Contact me via email = your views are important to us and will be actioned appropriately, good sir”
 
The petty semantics of online correspondence a solid 20ish years after the internet became ubiquitous.

“Contact me via Twitter = GFY”

“Contact me via email = your views are important to us and will be actioned appropriately, good sir”

I understand your frustrations sir, but please keep your voice down. Please accept this complimentary bumper sticker and scarf.
 
This bloke being in charge of our 150th year is so embarrassing and upsetting , "here are the greatest men in Australian sport, also allow me to introduce our soft drink addict with a mental disorder "

150th something something
 
The elephant in the room that we are screaming about is why Hinkley has maintained his position despite being the overseer for an extended stint of mediocrity. What are his positive traits that justify him keeping his position? I'm genuinely struggling to see what they are.
 
The elephant in the room that we are screaming about is why Hinkley has maintained his position despite being the overseer for an extended stint of mediocrity. What are his positive traits that justify him keeping his position? I'm genuinely struggling to see what they are.
 
This bloke being in charge of our 150th year is so embarrassing and upsetting , "here are the greatest men in Australian sport, also allow me to introduce our soft drink addict with a mental disorder "

150th something something
Mental disorder?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Correct me if I'm wrong but I do believe that Melbourne, North Melbourne and Carlton have all had 150ths in the past decade that ended up being disasters. I'm pretty sure Geelong was the only exception, but it still doesn't make me feel very good.
 



And I think this one was directed at me, following on from Ben's comments:



We got a shiny new logo, BE GRATEFUL!

Do you even know about the scarf? You know we’re getting a scarf? It will have 150 on it.

Let’s face it, the club wants lemmings not supporters.
 
Not sure I agree with this assessment, but credit to Ben for reaching out.

I will take him up on his offer, but rest assured, I won't be backing down.



So you were banned because of your anonymity and not your opinions then? What a fecking shit show. By that logic all unvarified posters should be banned. Is there any level of admin more interested in club success than than self preservation? C4 said the club was divided into 2 camps in both admin and footy departments. I don't have any idea on the numbers in both camps but we need to beat the drums louder to push for change. We need to flush this mf'ing turd.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top