Opinion Sack Hinkley 6 - Kochblocked

[PowerLil]

It's OK though because he'll have 12 months to learn off of Hinkley...

Won't take long to learn work harder for longer and stay strong in the contest.

 

[Steve Dore]

What street?

Davis

 

[PA1870FC]

Wanting to make Ken’s life miserable in Adelaide is pretty toxic and many steps too far.

Pull your membership, sure. Complain to the board, sure. But when you start talking about mass signs at games and effectively harassing someone I really don’t see what that achieves other than putting future candidates right off the club.

At some point your energy has to turn back to supporting the boys next year to have a good crack at it. And no, that doesn’t mean you have to support Ken or be a “happy clapper”. But creating a toxic environment for everyone will do nothing for our on-field performances next year or the years after.

He knows full well no one wants him around and is simply taking the loss collecting a pay cheque, funded from our memberships.

So we can do what we want you troll


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[RossFC]

If someone plasters a sack hinkley sign right on the window of the coaches box, will they peel the thing off, or have to replace the whole glass window?

 

[Papa G]

It’s absolutely cool that the AFL bails out these clubs, which it then uses as a basis for controlling them while at the same time organising the fixture so those clubs languish in low-visibility spots in the schedule so they find it harder to attract sponsors and pay their way out of debt.

There may not be technical corruption in AFL, in the sense of handouts and self-dealing, but the whole thing is corrupt to the core.

There is definitely technical corruption. The AFL is a Victorian State Government proxy.

 

[Football Smith]

View attachment 1475919

What's with the SAFM logo? Were they running a best crowd sign competition or something?

 

[Ilias M]

looks like brilliant twitter/ Facebook page is down. Was fantastic in pointing out mediocrity

 

[tribey]

View attachment 1475943looks like brilliant twitter/ Facebook page is down. Was fantastic in pointing out mediocrity

The same people who drop their monocles and claim ‘disgust’ at simply-stated public votes of no confidence such as ‘SACK HINKLEY’ love to threaten, intimidate and generally act like moronic psychos.

 

[edgie]

He knows full well no one wants him around and is simply taking the loss collecting a pay cheque, funded from our memberships.

So we can do what we want you troll


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

The players want him around.

Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk

 

[tribey]

Wanting to make Ken’s life miserable in Adelaide is pretty toxic and many steps too far.

Pull your membership, sure. Complain to the board, sure. But when you start talking about mass signs at games and effectively harassing someone I really don’t see what that achieves other than putting future candidates right off the club.

At some point your energy has to turn back to supporting the boys next year to have a good crack at it. And no, that doesn’t mean you have to support Ken or be a “happy clapper”. But creating a toxic environment for everyone will do nothing for our on-field performances next year or the years after.

I thought we’d already established you were posting garbage like this last night as a bit?

It’s done. Played out. Finito.

 

[Papa G]

Board positions are unpaid. Every member on our board is independently financially well off. Aside from Ransom and Koch, they do it in most part because they are supposedly passionate Port Adelaide supporters, although some of the newly appointed females maybe token quota appointments. You've got to question each board members motivations? The AFL said no is a ****ing cowards excuse. If you truly believe Hinkley should go, you should either demand it or stand down. If you stand down explain to the members exactly why. Be a man (or woman). Stand by your conviction.

 

[dirty2]

Board positions are unpaid. Every member on our board is independently financially well off. Aside from Ransom and Koch, they do it in most part because they are supposedly passionate Port Adelaide supporters, although some of the newly appointed females maybe token quota appointments. You've got to question each board members motivations? The AFL said no is a ******* cowards excuse. If you truly believe Hinkley should go, you should either demand it or stand down. If you stand down explain to the members exactly why. Be a man (or woman). Stand by your conviction.

This ^^^ you could understand (a little) if they were getting paid million dollars a year ECT... And needed to protect there income... But they don't... Stand and fight with us... Or **** off.

 

[GranFormaggi]

What's with the SAFM logo? Were they running a best crowd sign competition or something?

I can't recall, but that would have been the type of shit they would have done.

For the younger folks, the Columbia reference is for Andrés Escobar who was assassinated after scoring an own goal in the 1994 World Cup.

After a dismal 1994 season, Crows fans clearly wanted change. Of course, they got Robert Shaw, whose kids got hassled at school over his coaching performance at Adelaide.

 

[Del165198]

If someone plasters a sack hinkley sign right on the window of the coaches box, will they peel the thing off, or have to replace the whole glass window?

If we slap a sticker on Ken's forehead, they'll have to get rid of him. No way that'll peel off.

 

[PA88]

Wanting to make Ken’s life miserable in Adelaide is pretty toxic and many steps too far.

Pull your membership, sure. Complain to the board, sure. But when you start talking about mass signs at games and effectively harassing someone I really don’t see what that achieves other than putting future candidates right off the club.

At some point your energy has to turn back to supporting the boys next year to have a good crack at it. And no, that doesn’t mean you have to support Ken or be a “happy clapper”. But creating a toxic environment for everyone will do nothing for our on-field performances next year or the years after.

I'm all for making it toxic. Nuclear toxic.

Sign:
10 SHIT YEARS
SACK HINKLEY

 

[Doctor Feel]

Theyve had ample chance for it never to get to this point. With Koch's announcement, its all is fair in love and war.

 

[PA88]

Yep. Agree.

Koch and co have brought this upon themselves, and not just about Hinkley extensions but their snobbery towards us and their smearing of club traditions and ethos.

 

[John the Butcher]

If someone plasters a sack hinkley sign right on the window of the coaches box, will they peel the thing off, or have to replace the whole glass window?

Wish I had seats Infront of there. Would be easy to get a sign on display

 

[finbarr]

If the rumours of the bust up between Schofield and Hinkley in the rooms pre-Preliminary Final are true, i hope Schoey decked the prick.

 

[Relativity]

Sack Hinkley VII - Kochtease

Sack Hinkley VII - Ken is a Kochwomble.

 

[PA88]

If the rumours of the bust up between Schofield and Hinkley in the rooms pre-Preliminary Final are true, i hope Schoey decked the prick.

You know how it is said that violence never solves anything ... sometimes it does.

 

[PA88]

I actually like the new thread title that somebody suggested, the one about Koch being Ken's bitch. It is fitting, Koch is the bitch for a few others too.

 

[Powerade 08]

Wanting to make Ken’s life miserable in Adelaide is pretty toxic and many steps too far.

Pull your membership, sure. Complain to the board, sure. But when you start talking about mass signs at games and effectively harassing someone I really don’t see what that achieves other than putting future candidates right off the club.

At some point your energy has to turn back to supporting the boys next year to have a good crack at it. And no, that doesn’t mean you have to support Ken or be a “happy clapper”. But creating a toxic environment for everyone will do nothing for our on-field performances next year or the years after.

Letting Ken go quietly and Koch/this board still there to pick the next coach is completely pointless. Thats not bringing me back to games. The place needs to be nuked.

 

[tribey]

Letting Ken go quietly and Koch/this board still there to pick the next coach is completely pointless. Thats not bringing me back to games. The place needs to be nuked.

If I had a buck for every time some nuff told me to ‘be patient/wait til next year/see what happens/the club knows what it’s doing’ at the end of a dumpster fire Hinkley-era season, I’d have a sh¡tload of dollars.

 

[Doctor Feel]

Letting Ken go quietly and Koch/this board still there to pick the next coach is completely pointless. Thats not bringing me back to games. The place needs to be nuked.

Why have you stolen my avatar?