Saints fans breaking out the injury excuses already?

Remove this Banner Ad

Now I know you are a liar as well as a nancy boy.
How will I notice you, the gay mardi gra look or a library monitor? or just listen for an idiot spewing crap?

I am telling the truth little man. Not my fault your fans are girls.

And yes, listen for me. You will hear it I assure you. You will then leave with your tail between your legs, never to be seen again.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Do you have a split peronality or do your mental problems run deeper?:eek:

No, I don't have a split 'peronality' - Dal Santo's a great kick, and with Hayes back to feed it out to him, his delivery is dangerous to us.

But he is massively over rated. When you needed him to step up last year, he was nowhere to be seen.
 
Ok, I'll ignore your back peddling about the fact you don't know the difference between the numbers two and three, and just address this point:

why would I be insecure about a team we continually smash?
Because I'm not. I just enjoy smashing them because their fans are a pack of weak dogs who wouldn't know a football if it hit them in the face (and I would like to see that happen for the record).

They are the WORST club in the history of the AFL. And that's a scientifically proven FACT. There is simply no bottom to their pit of crapness, and we will smash them on Friday. No question, it isn't even possible that they could win because their team just doesn't beat ours in normal circumstances. Just doesn't happen.

They had a full list to choose from bar TWO players in that final. Two.

In every final last year, every team was missing at least two players.

Not to mention the fact they think Michael Gardiner is somehow going to make them competitive in the ruck? GHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA classic.. they will get smashed out of the middle by the league's best young midfield group. Just the same as both matches last year.

1. What is your definition of 'smash' I reckon Saints have 'smashed' Dees in recent years by a lot more than 18 points.

2. Define how saints weak dogs differ from dees weak dogs. Dees fans are notoriously fragile and prone to not turning up when the going gets tough!

3. Do you understand the meaning of scientifically proven Please describe accurately the experiment together with the hypothesis.

4. Smash? What is the definition? 18 points?

5. You are confused. M. Gardiner wont play. But M. Clarke will. :D

6. You are confused again. The best young midfield group is WCE, Freo not bad either.

Hope that helps and look forward to the debate after dees lose! :D :D
 
1. What is your definition of 'smash' I reckon Saints have 'smashed' Dees in recent years by a lot more than 18 points.

Smash is the fact that of our last 12 matches we've won 10.

2. Define how saints weak dogs differ from dees weak dogs. Dees fans are notoriously fragile and prone to not turning up when the going gets tough!

The Demons average higher crowds than St Kilda by a decent margin, in fact, only Collingwood and Essendon average higher home crowds than Melbourne.

3. Do you understand the meaning of scientifically proven Please describe accurately the experiment together with the hypothesis.

You've only won one premiership ever, and you've come last more than any other club. This is proof that you are the worst.

4. Smash? What is the definition? 18 points?

See above.


5. You are confused. M. Gardiner wont play. But M. Clarke will. :D

Yes, I'm sure he's a match for Jeff White, one of the league's premier ruckmen over the last 10 years. Hell, Clarke isn't even as good as our third best ruckman, let alone Jeff White.

6. You are confused again. The best young midfield group is WCE, Freo not bad either.

Incorrect. Melbourne's young midfield group is vastly superior to both those sides. Name me one young player from either team as good as Brock McLean for example. Secondly, name me a better group of 5 than Bartram, Bate, Jones, Moloney, Sylvia . Name the six players 23 or under, and I'll agree with you.

Hope that helps and look forward to the debate after dees lose! :D :D

for a start, there is no debate, Melbourne are just better. Secondly, we won't lose, you guys are truly rooted. And just like after the final last year, 99% of Saints fans will leave bigfooty for a while, because they're weak dogs.
 
Seeing Maguire injured was awesome, he's a deadset w@nker and I wil be giving him a massive spray on friday night about it, he's a douchebag and belong at St Kilda - if you're there feel free to mention to me how much of a dropkick you think I am. Will not happen.

Last time Melbourne played St Kilda I was sitting near YOUR members, and not ONE st kilda fan was willing to argue back with me. I'm hardly an intimidating physical presence, but it just seems your fans are actually in agreement with me when I mention you're the biggest joke of a football club and your fans are the worst bandwagoners in the country.

Anyway, talk is cheap, all that matters is that you're our bitches.

You're a funny boy, rick (with a lower case 'R'). Maguire a "deadset w@nker"? Priceless coming from the likes of you. You gonna give him a "massive spray"? Ooooh I'm sure he'll be crapping in his jocks. What, not ONE St Kilda fan was willing to argue back with you? Did it ever occur to you that's because you are a worthless cockroach well beneath any human beings notice? Hardly an intimidating presence? That explains a lot - little man syndrome? Our fans are the worst bandwagoners in the country? Sorry, which team do you follow? This year?

Talk is cheap? A bizarre statement after you have just spewed out reams and reams of puerile contradictory rubbish. You are all talk. And this is just one post among many examples of it.
 
If rick James, melbourne supporter, thinks stkilda are a loser club, then they must really reek. I mean, melbourne are pathetic, and for stkilda to be worse than that well...what's a word that describes being more pathetic than "pathetic"?
 
If rick James, melbourne supporter, thinks stkilda are a loser club, then they must really reek. I mean, melbourne are pathetic, and for stkilda to be worse than that well...what's a word that describes being more pathetic than "pathetic"?

3 spoons in 5 years!!! Less than 5 wins a year over that period!! Carlton haaahahaahahaa.
 
If rick James, melbourne supporter, thinks stkilda are a loser club, then they must really reek. I mean, melbourne are pathetic, and for stkilda to be worse than that well...what's a word that describes being more pathetic than "pathetic"?

Thanks CattyBossDog, we can cop it from someone who's actually seen their team win a flag (presuming you are older than 12). But I won't cop it from Demons or Cats in particular. And I think pathetic is bad enough, let's not go digging any deeper...
 
Maguire may not play, do you honestly believe Rivers is as valuable as Reiwoldt in a side?

Maguire will play.

I didn't say Rivers is as valuable as Riewolt in a side. I said our LIST of outs is around equivalent to your list of outs. Rivers would probably have played on Riewolt but I don't think they are equivalent outs. I think our other outs compare to your other outs make up most/all of the difference. SO there will be no valid 'injury excuse' for either side.
 
Thanks CattyBossDog, we can cop it from someone who's actually seen their team win a flag (presuming you are older than 12). But I won't cop it from Demons or Cats in particular. And I think pathetic is bad enough, let's not go digging any deeper...

You don't have a choice sonny, until we win 26 spoons and you win another 11 flags, we're better than you.

You will cop it, and you will enjoy it. I will force you to.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If rick James, melbourne supporter, thinks stkilda are a loser club, then they must really reek. I mean, melbourne are pathetic, and for stkilda to be worse than that well...what's a word that describes being more pathetic than "pathetic"?

or what word descibes salary cap cheating and 3 out the last 5 spoons?.....Carlton. :)
 
Smash is the fact that of our last 12 matches we've won 10.

[I]Smashed [/I]is not an accurate term to describe that in common English.

The Demons average higher crowds than St Kilda by a decent margin, in fact, only Collingwood and Essendon average higher home crowds than Melbourne.

Blatant lie!



You've only won one premiership ever, and you've come last more than any other club. This is proof that you are the worst.

That is about to change, and will start Fri night. But what is your hypothesis and I'm still waiting for you to accurately describe your experiment.


See above.




Yes, I'm sure he's a match for Jeff White, one of the league's premier ruckmen over the last 10 years. Hell, Clarke isn't even as good as our third best ruckman, let alone Jeff White.

Ummm Bullsh1t!


Incorrect. Melbourne's young midfield group is vastly superior to both those sides. Name me one young player from either team as good as Brock McLean for example. Secondly, name me a better group of 5 than Bartram, Bate, Jones, Moloney, Sylvia . Name the six players 23 or under, and I'll agree with you.

Who?


for a start, there is no debate, Melbourne are just better. Secondly, we won't lose, you guys are truly rooted. And just like after the final last year, 99% of Saints fans will leave bigfooty for a while, because they're weak dogs.


See you after the game. Weak dogs? Define yourself then?
 
Mate, we've been through this before. Melbourne cheated the salary cap before Carlton ever did, have won more spoons, and won less premierships, so by rJs own logic:
Carlton >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melbourne.

Actually Carlton cheated the cap back in the 60's... you should learn more about footy before you speak
 
You don't have a choice sonny, until we win 26 spoons and you win another 11 flags, we're better than you.

You will cop it, and you will enjoy it. I will force you to.

You are suffering delusions of grandeur rick - regarding yourself and your team. I don't care about MFC's ancient history. Mate, give as good as you've got - water off a ducks back. The only thing you force me to do is laugh in disbelief at your inflated opinion of yourself and your team.
 
See you after the game. Weak dogs? Define yourself then?

lol, that was possibly the worst argument for why St Kilda don't suck that I've ever heard.

I'm a proud supporter of one of the most successful clubs in the AFL - I'm also a fan of football in general, and like most fans, I think St Kilda are a disgrace to the game of football by merely existing.

And yes, good luck to you seeing me after the game, I wager that you like most other saints fans will have left by half time anyway - weak dogs
 
for a start, there is no debate, Melbourne are just better. Secondly, we won't lose, you guys are truly rooted. And just like after the final last year, 99% of Saints fans will leave bigfooty for a while, because they're weak dogs.

So, rick if you cop a flogging on Friday night can we expect you to be back here to tell us how you are worse than rooted? Or will you disappear for a while? Or worse still offer up a raft of excuses? What's that you say? Can't happen. Nah, the Reverend's been talking you up, Robbo's been on SEN claiming only a flag will do. Understandable ploys, really, considering the need to boost membership. I will concede you were much improved last year but still a flaky side that won't inspire fear in anyone. Time will tell, eh?
 
You are suffering delusions of grandeur rick - regarding yourself and your team. I don't care about MFC's ancient history. Mate, give as good as you've got - water off a ducks back. The only thing you force me to do is laugh in disbelief at your inflated opinion of yourself and your team.

Mate, I never give as good as I get, I would never let my standards drop so low - I am the measuring stick and just remember how lucky you are to breathe the air I fart in.

Your club is gay.
 
Last time Melbourne played St Kilda I was sitting near YOUR members, and not ONE st kilda fan was willing to argue back with me. I'm hardly an intimidating physical presence, but it just seems your fans are actually in agreement with me when I mention you're the biggest joke of a football club and your fans are the worst bandwagoners in the country][/QUOTE]

Typical small man mentality by his own admission! Big mouth small d1ck. Also confuses his manic egocentricity and attention seeking with self confidence. I can just see little rJ screaming like a banshee about how good dees are and how bad saints are, while anyone in hearing distance does their best to ignore him. Would be very frustrating for the little fellow! But that thought wouldn't enter his self obsessed little mind would it? Feckless fool that he is. In a way, it's a pity someone doesn't shove a fist down his throat, but probably the more effective response to simply ignore.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Saints fans breaking out the injury excuses already?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top