Re: Aps Team Of 2005
It seems to me that there is an too much emphasis on players in good APS teams. A good player in a poor team gets no easy kicks because his team mates' delivery is always poor, when they run to good spots their team mates do not have the vision to see them so those good players spend all their time earning hard ball gets. For example, any player at WC that get 30 possessions against HC is a gun and you can bet at least half of those will be hard ball gets. Also, the good gteams soon figure out who those few good players are in th epoor teams and tag them heavily and try to take them out off the ball so they really have to be tough. A gun player in a gun team mostly gets quality delivery and does not suffer the same heavy treatment. I would like to see much more emphasis on an APS team based on the players who consistently earn the most hard ball gets, weak in and weak out. There will be gems like that in each of the poor APS teams. Put any of those players in a good team and they will absolutely shine against the very best opposition because they know how to get the hard ball.
Skevies said:Anyone wanna take a shot at naming the APS team this year to verse AGS,
a lot of very good players playing this year and will be a avery hard job.
So far you would have to throw in the mix Aaron Murray (haileybury), Anthony Raso (haileybury) Tory Dickson (Haileybury), Chris Cain ( St Kevins), Rob Eddy (Caulfield), Andrew Ainger (Scotch), Nick Smith (Scotch), Tom Hawkins (Melbourne), Josh Kennedy (Xavier), James Magner (haileybury), Andrew Mcguinness (Brighton) thats all that i can remember so far, but everyone else add your comments and we'll try and get a dream team up and going and see if it matches the final team at the end of 2005!!!!!!
It seems to me that there is an too much emphasis on players in good APS teams. A good player in a poor team gets no easy kicks because his team mates' delivery is always poor, when they run to good spots their team mates do not have the vision to see them so those good players spend all their time earning hard ball gets. For example, any player at WC that get 30 possessions against HC is a gun and you can bet at least half of those will be hard ball gets. Also, the good gteams soon figure out who those few good players are in th epoor teams and tag them heavily and try to take them out off the ball so they really have to be tough. A gun player in a gun team mostly gets quality delivery and does not suffer the same heavy treatment. I would like to see much more emphasis on an APS team based on the players who consistently earn the most hard ball gets, weak in and weak out. There will be gems like that in each of the poor APS teams. Put any of those players in a good team and they will absolutely shine against the very best opposition because they know how to get the hard ball.