Scott Pendlebury vs Trent Cotchin

[Engimal]

Most he has ever kicked.

58 in one year is his best ever, Jack has already 60+ in three of his six years, and Nick 60+ four times.

Your funny, lol. Petrie over both Riewoldts, lol.

Petrie kicked 58 with two other tall forwards/full forwards. Who do the others have to compete with? No one. Their squads are shit. Now that's settled, let's get back to the topic at hand and, this time, try not to go off topic, okay?

Pendles, easy.

 

[Bazzar]

Petrie kicked 58 with two other tall forwards/full forwards. Who do the others have to compete with? No one. Their squads are shit. Now that's settled, let's get back to the topic at hand and, this time, try not to go off topic, okay?

Pendles, easy.

Why easy? I asked before but you didnt answer.

 

[Engimal]

Why easy? I asked before but you didnt answer.

Because Pendlebury is a far better player than Cotchin and has been at a superior level for a while.

 

[Ironmonger]

Pendlebury just about the best player in the league, for me.

 

[Bazzar]

Because Pendlebury is a far better player than Cotchin and has been at a superior level for a while.

Very detailed and thought out assessment.

 

[Heisenberg_]

It's not disagreeing that sees you get labelled a troll, its ridiculous statements such as Pendlebury by a country mile that see you labelled as a troll because anybody with any hint of a clue knows that is a complete BS statement.

 

[Engimal]

It's not disagreeing that sees you get labelled a troll, its ridiculous statements such as Pendlebury by a country mile that see you labelled as a troll because anybody with any hint of a clue knows that is a complete BS statement.

And anyone with a hint of common sense would would know that opinions are subjective.

Stop crying and discuss the topic, not my posts. Cheers.

 

[WinmarToLockett]

Scott Pendelbury has consistently dominated games in a premiership winning team, playing in a midfield alongside multiple all australians (luke ball, dale thomas) and an mvp / brownlow medal winner (dane swan).

Cotchin occasionally stands out in a team that can't even make the finals, playing in a midfield alongside some servicable players that I cannot name.

Pendelbury is one of the current top 5 midfielders in the game. Cotchin is not.

Not saying Cotchin won't end up having a brilliant career, but he's got a long way to go yet.

 

[Bazzar]

And anyone with a hint of common sense would would know that opinions are subjective.

Stop crying and discuss the topic, not my posts. Cheers.

One and the same.

And you still haven't explained how Pendles is better by a country mile.

 

[Engimal]

One and the same.

And you still haven't explained how Pendles is better by a country mile.

And I don't have to. That's the funny thing.

This post basically explains it for me though:

Scott Pendelbury has consistently dominated games in a premiership winning team, playing in a midfield alongside multiple all australians (luke ball, dale thomas) and an mvp / brownlow medal winner (dane swan).

Cotchin occasionally stands out in a team that can't even make the finals, playing in a midfield alongside some servicable players that I cannot name.

Pendelbury is one of the current top 5 midfielders in the game. Cotchin is not.

Not saying Cotchin won't end up having a brilliant career, but he's got a long way to go yet.

 

[TigerBlood87]

Pendelbury is one of the current top 5 midfielders in the game. Cotchin is not.

You're right he's not, he's one of the top 5 best players in the league full stop.

 

[Bazzar]

And I don't have to. That's the funny thing.

This post basically explains it for me though:

As i thought, you just have no idea.

 

[Engimal]

As i thought, you just have no idea.

Okay. I'm not arguing anymore. If your not going to let someone have an opinion that's different than yours, get off an internet forum before your head explodes.

 

[Bazzar]

Okay. I'm not arguing anymore. If your not going to let someone have an opinion that's different than yours, get off an internet forum before your head explodes.

But you didnt have an opinion, just quoted another troll post.

 

[Engimal]

But you didnt have an opinion, just quoted another troll post.

Collingwood is a great, premiership winning team filled with awardees and players who are recognised as some of the best in the competition. Pendlebury is either considered the best or 2nd best (behind Swan) in that team.

Cotchin is a standout in team that doesn't play finals.

Most people would take Pendles over Cotchin. The poll evidences this.
Cotchin is good. Pendlebury is much better.

Goodbye.

 

[Ron]

Your opinion, but when comparing to the better players they are good ordinary. Im not saying they are no good.

The player that finished second to Cotchin last year is the #1 good ordinary player in the comp. Deledio wouldn't finish top 5 in a b&f of any of the top 8 sides of last season.

Behind that came Maric (Adelaide discard) Tuck (Struggles to get a game for Richmond most of the time) Grigg (lol)

Wouldn't take much of a player to beat that group.

 

[PUNTROADHAMMER]

The player that finished second to Cotchin last year is the #1 good ordinary player in the comp. Deledio wouldn't finish top 5 in a b&f of any of the top 8 sides of last season.

Behind that came Maric (Adelaide discard) Tuck (Struggles to get a game for Richmond most of the time) Grigg (lol)

Wouldn't take much of a player to beat that group.

Surely, after 18,840 posts you should be somewhat better at trolling than this Ronny??
This bears the stamp of a rosy cheeked amateur......

 

[BC9_]

Pendlebury will go up another level as he enters his prime. I wouldn't trade him for any player in the league bar Lance Franklin.

Yes. Gun.

 

[Kangaman 94]

Albeit Richmond have never played finals but Pendlebury will be ahead of Cotchin because he stands up when it counts. Pendlbury is in the top 3 mids Cotchin is top 10. Potential is to big of a word to rate Cotchin higher or equal to the likes of Pendlebury

 

[CasuallyDressed]

I was close to voting Cotchin.

I voted Pendlebury. I'd happily have either or take Cotchin if he wanted out of Richmond.

 

[biggiemediums]

I love Cotchin but some of you Richmond fans are starting to make me bitter about him. You can't stand anyone being rated higher.

 

[Bazzar]

I love Cotchin but some of you Richmond fans are starting to make me bitter about him. You can't stand anyone being rated higher.

Apart from some obvious piss taking, i have missed the serious posts where the Tiges have said Cotch is currently better.

 

[biggiemediums]

Apart from some obvious piss taking, i have missed the serious posts where the Tiges have said Cotch is currently better.

It's not that but in this thread and the Beams one, every time someone says Beams or Pendles, a few of you keep asking for explanations every time, yet when someone says 'Cotchin' it's all fine.

 

[Bazzar]

It's not that but in this thread and the Beams one, every time someone says Beams or Pendles, a few of you keep asking for explanations every time, yet when someone says 'Cotchin' it's all fine.

Beams thread fair enough, their is a gap in class. But Pendles at this stage has the runs on the board and is the better of the two.

 

[PUNTROADHAMMER]

I love Cotchin but some of you Richmond fans are starting to make me bitter about him. You can't stand anyone being rated higher.

We're not saying that at all. We're responding like we are because some are saying that it's "not even close". 99% of neutrals would say that "not even close" is just ludicrous, the remaining 1% would be undecided.
Don't blame us for responding like that to such ridiculous statements.