It was 22 years ago just i will start with last round. If memory serves me correctly he wasnt getting any in that game.If you can point out the games that Woewodin didn't deserve votes in that would be great. Name the round and which player deserved the votes over him. Also be good if you could give your 3-2-1 for each Melbourne game in 2000 so we can see where the variances are.
The Brownlow is not the best player, it's the best player in each game played. Woewodin deserved every vote he got, probably would have received more if he was a big name going into the season. That's the Brownlow system.
The query is if he was given anything from Shane Carter that was illegal but improved his chances of being the best player on the ground. There is a massive question mark over that. Saying he just didn't deserve it is lazy and the sign of a low-IQ football follower.