So, Dockerland1, have you stopped beating your wife yet?
Innocent until proven guilty is a good principle. If you don't like it, you are the campaigner.
-
Guest - BigFooty Tipping 2025 - Get on! - $500 first prize - Weekly Prizes - Click to Join
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Shane Yarran in trouble
- Thread starter Mr Fonebone
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
So, Dockerland1, have you stopped beating your wife yet?
Innocent until proven guilty is a good principle. If you don't like it, you are the campaigner.
Reverse Torp
Senior List
- Oct 26, 2016
- 244
- 769
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- SDFC, Sutherland Spartans FC,
I've said this before, but what the hell I'll say it again.
The bloke has a contract with FFC. There will be circumstances under which that contract can be terminated. Being CHARGED will NOT be one of those circumstances. If your employer sacked you on the basis of being charged with a serious offence would you just accept that? Also bear in mind that if FFC were to terminate his contract now, AFLPA would rip us a new one.
IF he is found guilty of a serious offence the club would almost certainly cut him and rightly so. In the meantime the club will have to wait for the judicial process to run its course the same as everyone else.
Well Clem's knee, you obviously don't know me or my wife. Disgusting of you to say such a thing about someone that you don't know.
Jesus Christ, what a scumbag you are. This is not about me, this is about a player who has been convicted and jailed previously who is in trouble again.
To say what you have just said is as low an act as you can make.
Retract your statement or you will be dealing with a law suit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Banker
Club Legend
- May 17, 2014
- 2,906
- 1,931
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
cute display picture
You are privy to the terms and conditions on Yarran's contract are you? Freo would / could have had behavioural conditions written into it for just a situation like this.
For the record we need him badly but do you seriously see this getting better?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You have to be a pretty big dickhead to post something this.
I think you'll find the law is comfortable with taking the piss out of one dimensional opinion and you've also gone hook,line,sinker,rod,reel and dinghy for and oldy.
Confirmed as a Goldie.
Are your children still gambling??
Is the young'en off crack??
You have friends here don't forget we're here to help.
So, in the English language...ah forget it...
- Mar 2, 2007
- 43,290
- 62,251
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Cowboys, Packers, Scorchers
Still waiting for an apology.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I could not agree more. It just came out of nowhere as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lach72, I know you are a reasonable guy. I was discussing a point then this idiot slandered me like that. How would you react?
I was the one discussing the point in thread!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I feogot you cannot question anyone associated with club on here anymore.
Ah no...that's not what he did at all
Like everything in life. The representation that you engage can and frequently will effect the outcome.
P.S. Might want to read up on current laws regarding such issues in social media.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reverse Torp
Senior List
- Oct 26, 2016
- 244
- 769
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- SDFC, Sutherland Spartans FC,
Whether we need him badly is completely irrelevant. He hasn't been found guilty of the new charges yet despite what you might think of his character. It's way too late to terminate him based on the matters he was convicted of post being recruited. If the club was to terminate him now they would be opening themselves up to legal action for wrongful dismissal.
Pretty simple I would have thought.
This post, along with the even more abusive private message I received, indicates that you have missed the point of my post.
I thought I made it pretty clear that an accusation is not the same as a conviction. I used the old question, which is impossible to answer without implicating yourself (that is the joke) to show why and how we should wait for a legal decision before we pronounce condemnation on Yarran, or anyone else.
I didn't make a statement to retract, so it's hard to retract it. I asked a question.
And I thought actually beating your wife would be a lower act than asking that question of someone, or even of accusing them of it.
Sigh.. and you have to be pretty stupid to not understand.
Jesus Christ.
Let me spell it out for you...
He used a deliberately offensive statement and insinuation to emphasise the importance of presumption of innocence in the eyes of the law.
You're a fine upstanding member of the community. you get the benefit of the doubt in the eyes of the law. Shane may not be but he should be entitled to the same.
Might just stop reading your posts.
The board is awash with wuckfits perhaps it's always been the case?
PS:Are your children still gambling??
Is the young'en off crack??
I'm assuming you've stopped belting the bride.
Apologise now Clem's Knee and I will accept that your insane statement was an attempt to make a point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DockerLand1 And just to be clear. I had no idea that you were married, and I have no interest in ever meeting you to find out how you treat other people. I was responding to your post, so I felt that my post was on topic.
If the question had no context and no explaining sentence just below the question, I would have more sympathy for your outrage.
It's okay. When you calm down, have another read and then stop threatening me.
Edit:
Just read your last post. Are we okay now?
If the question had no context and no explaining sentence just below the question, I would have more sympathy for your outrage.
It's okay. When you calm down, have another read and then stop threatening me.
Edit:
Just read your last post. Are we okay now?
- Status
