HaroLad
HaroChad
Would you be opposed to a player advocting on the field for paedophile rights or ISIS? Why not - it's their opinion, right?Look you have at your one man war against people having opinions.
You are deliberately misrepresenting my argument, and not only that, you are yet to address it.I'm not going to stop you, but dressing up cliff notes from Sky News culture wars as reasoned analysis doesn't fool anybody.
As far as the immediate future I am probably inclined to agree with you. However, morality should only be judged according to contemporary standards. To presume our morality will move in X direction and so in anticipation we had best take a view in harmony with X is really adapting the presupposed uncertain moralities of tomorow today, which is exactly what you are doing. We shouldn't adjust our views in accordance with presupposed future moralities - contemporaneous standards exist for a reason.I'm confident you are already on the wrong side of history on this one.