- Jul 18, 2013
- 4,894
- 18,820
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
I'm not exactly sure how it works but I don't believe they vote on who is allowed to be nominated. It's more that a designated sub-committee audits the bonafides of all prospective nominees to weed out any that might be considered inappropriate to be on the board of a professional football club. For example, someone who has filed for bankruptcy or someone who has spent time in jail, I imagine, would not make it through the vetting process.Its hard.
You need 75% of the vote on the day to win and this is deliberately done to ensure any member initiated vote is hard to get across the line.
Similar to relocation too.
If the club ever decided to want to move away from Arden St, than that would also require 75% of the majority vote.
Similar to anyone who wants to be nominated to represent the club on its board.
There is a vetting process that the club has put in place where by they get to vote on who is allowed to be nominated. This was apparently done so that the average joe doesn't waste the clubs time with an underqualified candidate request. Think back to that * group who tried to reinstate Sheedy during Knights failed tenure.
I get all that, but for a member run club there isn't much sway the members have, if at all.
#SUABAM