- Thread starter
- #51
On an individual basis think you are doing Ah Chee an enormous disservice. You seriously think a 15 year old capable of giving an interview like this on his background and family history is a risk of being a dickhead? In terms of personality, he's streets ahead of his contemporaries regardless of whether their skin is black or white. He also has an older brother who knows the AFL system well and is very highly regarded for his level headed personality at Port. He's been in 'the system' all the way through and knows what will be expected of him from next year onwards.
I would go as far as to say that I'm more convinced of his qualities of a person than as a footballer, and that says something given his talent. I have not been able to catch him in any games this year, but my impressions from last year were that I thought he suffers a little bit for being a bit too versatile. I felt he needed a lot of space to gain the advantage over his opponent when playing as a key forward which is obviously a luxury at the professional level and as a midfielder he wasn't quite there yet in terms of having a consistent impact. Those impressions were made with him being an underager, so reading too much may be a bit harsh perhaps.
To go back to your original point about the risk of aboriginal recruits, I think whilst it should be acknowledged that there has been some bad cases in the past, but to automatically presume guilt is a dangerous attitude to take when you look at how impressive and considerate a guy like Ah Chee comes off in that interview. Dayle Garlett has a lot to answer for.
I agree, to automatically presume guilt is a dangerous attitude. But before doing due diligence would you expect a club to put themselves at risk. Attrition rate for indigenous players at a guess is about 20-30% while its 1-3% for white kids. With pick 10 in the draft, you can either pick an 8/10 with a 20% chance of leaving the competition or a 7/10 with a 2% chance. I know what I'd pick. Yes, one specific case doesn't have a high chance of backfiring but if you make that decision 10 times, you likely lose two players.
I agree that the attrition rate is a serious issue and we should be investing whatever resources we can into significantly lowering it and allowing for an easier transition for these talents.
Disagree that Dayle Garlett has a lot to answer for. He, Relton Roberts, Zephaniah Skinner, Tim Sumner, Brad Hartman, Josh Simpson, Dom Barry, Murray Newman, Liam Patrick, Rex Liddy, Carl Peterson, Troy Taylor, Nathan Krakouer, Liam Jurrah, Nathan Djerkurra, Andrew Krakouer and Terry Milera all have a collective lot to answer for, and that's just those I can remember. There's just too many examples of failure to maximise talent plus premature retirement/delisting due to inability to cope with the demands to ignore. Granted, none of those players bar simpson and newman were first round picks so perhaps you could argue that those who do go early have been heavily looked into and assessed as low risk, as the attrition rate is significantly lower for those picked inside the first round to outside it. Perhaps it's a case of the first round talent who are assessed as risky slips or that thise who are picked in the first receive more support; but there certainly is an issue that we can't just ignore - to an extent, rendell was right.