Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No not at all, So you are saying that if a bowler struggles in 20/20 games then they are a **** bowler? Ridiculous, leave the Pyjama games out of it.SthnX said:Shouldnt a "fantastic" bowler be able to perform in all forms of the game
Regarded? Are we talking about the same half tracking pie chucker?CrazyQ said:Why is he continually regarded as a great bowler by English fans?
He, not going by figures, is terrible with line and length, occasionally hits the spot and goes for runs when he is off, which is often.
Although he does get good bounce, who here actually rates him?
England need Hoggard Flintoff and Panesar to be on fire or else they are gone.
England fan by any chance? It aint half obvious.Big Man said:Harmison doesnt want to play one day cricket.
It shows in his body language, in his pie chuker abilities with the white ball and his overall performances in the one-day arena, eg 30.46? avg per wicket
Thats obvious.
However in the REAL form of the game he is much more destructive and really wants to perform with the red ball.
He will be a threat in the Ashes series mark my words and if you think different then it could be a long test series for the Auissies.
I would expect him to bounce back bigger than ever in this upcoming Ashes series.
It sticks out like that, because the Australians are so Bias and DeludedJerryWexler said:England fan by any chance? It aint half obvious.
What about? Being the best test and one day side in the world, or that Harmison is a half tracking pie thrower?Browney2006 said:It sticks out like that, because the Australians are so Bias and Deluded
A few years ago, yes.SthnX said:To whoever said harmison wasnt englands main bowler... take a look
Mat Runs HS BatAv W BB BowlAv 5w Ct
matches won 25 294 36* 16.33 121 7/12 23.26 7 4
matches drawn 10 101 39 11.22 30 4/94 41.60 0 0
matches lost 9 109 42 7.26 24 5/43 41.37 1 2
obviously he plays a large role in england winning test matches
so to those who still thinks he is a great test bowler, his average is in excess of 32 against all teams excluding the bangers and zimbabwe...
This is how i rank them.SthnX said:Who is englands best bowler then...
Browney2006 said:This is how i rank them.
Jonesy/Freddie (Hard to split them, personally Jonesy nudges him out)
The Hogg
Big Harmi
Monty
I was kinda rating them in terms of the five bowlers that we would pick in the side and would be most valuable to the side, with Panesar being there as the spinner. But come to think of it, i think Panesar is probably our fifth best bowler anyways, just from his performances so far, it could all change though as he is still young. But when i was rating the bowlers i was putting them in value to the side as a bowler.philhawk said:Really?
I'd have thought,
Jones/Flintoff
Hoggard
Harmison (all as you say),
But then,
Mahmood
Anderson
Panesar
JerryWexler said:England fan by any chance? It aint half obvious.
Nope, the Hog does.SthnX said:If i remember correctly isnt harmison the one usually bowling the first over of an innings?
Browney2006 said:Nope, the Hog does.
Am i correct in saying that Shane warne is 4th or 5th bowler to get a bowl?
Browney2006 said:Am i correct in saying that Shane warne is 4th or 5th bowler to get a bowl?
Shane Warne has a terrible record against India in Australia or India, averaging 40+, so this does not make him a great bowler? Its ridiculous to say that bowlers a great when they bowl well everywhere, rarely are you going to see someone dominate EVERYWHEREBig Man said:Yes & no.
Shane Prefers to come on when the ball is older but has had to come on 1st change when the quicks have failed to make an impression.
Great bowlers can bow anywhere, anytime.
Browney2006 said:Shane Warne has a terrible record against India in Australia or India, averaging 40+, so this does not make him a great bowler? Its ridiculous to say that bowlers a great when they bowl well everywhere, rarely are you going to see someone dominate EVERYWHERE
SthnX said:is your next argument that, giles is a great bowler?
Browney2006 said:Shane Warne has a terrible record against India in Australia or India, averaging 40+, so this does not make him a great bowler? Its ridiculous to say that bowlers a great when they bowl well everywhere, rarely are you going to see someone dominate EVERYWHERE
Djibril Cisse said:Simon Jones
Matthew Hoggard
Freddie Flintoff
James Anderson
Monty Panesar
Sajid Mahmood
Jon Lewis
Darren Gough
Paul Collingwood
Jamie Dalrymple
Ronnie Irani
Vikram Solanki
The guy that ran Ricky Ponting out in the Ashes
Steve Harmison
Ashley Giles
Yep, Warne just aint a good bowler according to Aussie fans.Browney2006 said:Shane Warne has a terrible record against India in Australia or India, averaging 40+, so this does not make him a great bowler? Its ridiculous to say that bowlers a great when they bowl well everywhere, rarely are you going to see someone dominate EVERYWHERE