- Sep 16, 2006
- 36,308
- 36,375
- AFL Club
- West Coast
The full scale search involving 5+ countries may be called off soon, but they'll still have one or two planes regularly searching.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yawn.A NZ search plane spotted some objects in the new search area.
A NZ search plane spotted some objects in the new search area.
Don't know why but i read that in Hulk hogans voice. Maybe it was the "brother" you put in there.Sometimes the truth is extreme, brother. And the digger you deep, more outrageous the truth becomes. Seriously, when I first read that our own banks had to borrow from the US Federal Reserve after the LB collapse, I was like 'no way'. So I went and did some digging, and still wasn't convinced. So I went and checked the US Fed's own website, scanned its own excel spreadsheets, and sure enough, there it was in black and white.
Don't think I just woke up one day and thought, 'you know what, I think this country is on a knife-edge'. Far, far from it, as fairdinkum's posts in this thread are testament to. It was only when I went and did some extensive digging that the magnitude of what lay before us became clear to me.
There is no middle ground between fact and fiction, my good man.
http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_03_24_2014_p0-674902.xmlInmarsat used these signals to establish that MH370 was in the air for about 6 hr. after it lost contact. The deeper analysis helped the company and U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch investigators narrow down the final ping to a remote area over the southern Indian Ocean, in the vicinity of where search teams have been working for more than a week.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/24/flight-mh370-inmarsat-aaib-analysisThe new method "gives the approximate direction of travel, plus or minus about 100 miles, to a track line", Chris McLaughlin, senior vice-president for external affairs at Inmarsat, told Sky News. "Unfortunately this is a 1990s satellite over the Indian Ocean that is not GPS-equipped. All we believe we can do is to say that we believe it is in this general location, but we cannot give you the final few feet and inches where it landed. It's not that sort of system."
McLaughlin told CNN that there was no further analysis possible of the data.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...h-zone-moved-based-on-planes-fuel-consumptionThe Australian-led search for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 has shifted 1,100km to the north-east after investigators calculated the plane was going faster and using more fuel when it disappeared than previously thought.
The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (Amsa) said the analysis was based on the plane's final radar contacts between the South China Sea and the Strait of Malacca, and suggested the plane would have burned more fuel in the opening stages of its flight. It therefore would not have made it as far into the Indian Ocean before running out of fuel and crashing.
Fascinating how just a few days ago we were told this:
http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_03_24_2014_p0-674902.xml
And this:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/24/flight-mh370-inmarsat-aaib-analysis
But now we are supposed to believe that they have revised their calculations based on radar data.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...h-zone-moved-based-on-planes-fuel-consumption
What, this radar data only became available in the last couple of days?
Come on.
If you remember back to the aftermath of 9/11, one of the big findings and criticisms was that there were so many different agencies with different bits of information, they weren't talking to each other, and consequently response to incidents like that were slow, confused and often ineffective.These quotes aren't contradictory. The "no further analysis" is in relation to the satellite data, while the new calculations are based on radar data (as you say). So I'm not sure what your point there is. The question of why this information from the radar data wasn't known earlier is reasonable, but there are probably some explanations more likely than "international coverup" in my view.
Yes but the 'What if this happened or what if that happened' doesn't mean shit when you really don't know where the plane is. I'd laugh (not because of the situation it's tragic, but more so I'd laugh at the idiots involved in the search) if the plane is no where near where they are searching. I wouldn't put it pass them to stuff it up completely. They've already said so many idiotic things in this case that anything is possible.You'd think that on balance of probability they know what happened but require physical evidence.
That will achieve as much as the Malaysian government.can do nuthin but pray....
The size of the black box reciver is tiny. I was expecting something the size of a car or house being towed to receive the signal
They know, Rolls Royce have GPS tracking in their engine sensors.The only way to stop data being sent to them is to turn the engines off.There's no doubt in my mind the Malaysians have no idea where it is and are being lead by others in terms of the search.
What is surprising is the lack of any real evidence from the world's superpowers. Once the plane was out of Malaysian radar range you can hardly blame them for then not knowing where it is. The countries with the supposed technical capability are either not telling us everything they know or they simply don't know. They'll never admit to either.
So we wait . . .
If you ever saw a navy vessel next to a house you would see it could drag something house size but more compact through the water with easeDrag a house through the water?