-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Sunraysia Football league
- Thread starter ringo1
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
woof woof
Debutant
Yaaablett said:
Who respective clubs do deckett and hickey play for?
Ibis100
Team Captain
Time to clear it all up for you Skeeterman.
The umpires offered me a set penalty of one week which I declined as I believed it was not a reportable incident.
As I took a set penalty last year I am in fact inelligable for the set penalty this year which the umpires obviously didn't know anyway.
I pleaded NOT GUILTY as I stated I would yesterday. Why would I go to the trouble of not taking a set penalty of one week when offered and have to go to the tribunal on Monday night in my own time and then plead guilty.
The umpires gave different versions of what occurred. Gill came along as a witness and stated he saw the incident from the opposite end of the ground some 80 metres away and surprisingly, not one player was between himself and the incident but did not report me even though he said he clearly saw it. Mind you, he has an obligation under the rules to do so if he believes it constituted a strike. And he didn't.
Opie was in charge of the play and was no more than 20 metres away and did not do anything. No free kick, no report, nothing.
Breewel was behind and to the left of the incident, stated that the player went to ground after a round house right hand to the head. Considering his position of 40 metres away on the opposite side of the supposed contact, (And he even drew a picture of where he was) his glasses must have x-ray vision.
Not only that but he stated in contradiction to Gill and Josh Martin that the ball was some 50 metres away down the field.
Josh Martin and Gill both stated the ball had just been handballed and still within a few metres of the incident.
Josh stated he felt contact to the left side of his jaw, I must be elastic man to connect there with the inside of my right arm as the umpires had stated. He also stated he didn't go to ground like Breewel had stated but had just gotten on with the game and taken his kick.
In the end, they found me guilty but stated due to inconsistencies in the evidence and the lack of any injury other than a headache to Josh, they did not see any need to extend the one week that they must impose. (As that is the minimum set penalty whether you plead guilty or not) The tribunal then can add on any amount of time above that set amount that they feel the incident deserves.
I had requested a suspended sentence which they would have contemplated had the required one week minimum not been a requirement.
Hope that clears it up for you Skeeterman.
The umpires offered me a set penalty of one week which I declined as I believed it was not a reportable incident.
As I took a set penalty last year I am in fact inelligable for the set penalty this year which the umpires obviously didn't know anyway.
I pleaded NOT GUILTY as I stated I would yesterday. Why would I go to the trouble of not taking a set penalty of one week when offered and have to go to the tribunal on Monday night in my own time and then plead guilty.
The umpires gave different versions of what occurred. Gill came along as a witness and stated he saw the incident from the opposite end of the ground some 80 metres away and surprisingly, not one player was between himself and the incident but did not report me even though he said he clearly saw it. Mind you, he has an obligation under the rules to do so if he believes it constituted a strike. And he didn't.
Opie was in charge of the play and was no more than 20 metres away and did not do anything. No free kick, no report, nothing.
Breewel was behind and to the left of the incident, stated that the player went to ground after a round house right hand to the head. Considering his position of 40 metres away on the opposite side of the supposed contact, (And he even drew a picture of where he was) his glasses must have x-ray vision.
Not only that but he stated in contradiction to Gill and Josh Martin that the ball was some 50 metres away down the field.
Josh Martin and Gill both stated the ball had just been handballed and still within a few metres of the incident.
Josh stated he felt contact to the left side of his jaw, I must be elastic man to connect there with the inside of my right arm as the umpires had stated. He also stated he didn't go to ground like Breewel had stated but had just gotten on with the game and taken his kick.
In the end, they found me guilty but stated due to inconsistencies in the evidence and the lack of any injury other than a headache to Josh, they did not see any need to extend the one week that they must impose. (As that is the minimum set penalty whether you plead guilty or not) The tribunal then can add on any amount of time above that set amount that they feel the incident deserves.
I had requested a suspended sentence which they would have contemplated had the required one week minimum not been a requirement.
Hope that clears it up for you Skeeterman.
smasher100
Team Captain
- Jul 20, 2006
- 463
- 0
- AFL Club
- Sydney
yes it is.....its an absolute CLASSIC!!!Gusty said:
Just confirming the exact qualifying rules for reserves finals this yaer.
If you play 6 or more reserve games you can play as many senior games as you like and still qualify for the reseves finals?
If you dont play any senior games how many reserve games do you need to play to qualify?
I might have to start looking at our reserves as Wenty and Mildura are blocking our run home.
If you play 6 or more reserve games you can play as many senior games as you like and still qualify for the reseves finals?
If you dont play any senior games how many reserve games do you need to play to qualify?
I might have to start looking at our reserves as Wenty and Mildura are blocking our run home.
Gladstone Small
Debutant
Peter Mac said:
i think you should be picking the best players available. Sometimes you might find an onballer in the back pocket because you cant squeeze him in anywhere else. I'll have a go at the team of the year to this stage;
Carn A. Rigby Harley
Spivey DeAngelis Stafford
Lee Gathercole Cumming
Zappia Simms O'Callaghan
Eagle Cardew Haase
Deckert Jackson Falvo
D. Hickey Eaton Anstey Ridley
?? O'Connor, Romeo, Dowdy, Curran, B. Hards, Clay, Treloar, T. White, Doherty, Thornton.
Gladstone Small said:
not bad gladstone... justin clay would be a certainty.. as he has been the best if not equal ruckman in the comp all year... i think we need to be careful as well at not picking blokes on reputation just cause they are proven players in the past... i would have b. rigby also ahead of a few in that list...
also been away a few days and just been catching up on the posts good prediction yaablett the roo boys are coming home hard as i have said all along if we can get our structure rite we are up there in the best 2-3 sides...
im also amazed at the amount of sooking that comes out of south.. excuses galore, blaming this blaming that.. at the end of the day in a big game you failed and got beat by 10 goals.. enough said.. anyway im sure everyone will agree we are all sick and tired of talking bout south.. lets talk bout sides who will be in the finals instead..... if mildura beat imps this week then the four wont change a win from imps makes it interesting should be a cracker that.. so should irymple robinvale as the swallows will be keen to let the vale know who is boss after they were hammered last time they met....
I have it on very good authority that largest amount of money ever wagered on a game of SFL footy will happen this week between Irymple and Robinvale. Apparantly 10K plus will change hands this Saturday at about 5.30pm. Any of yours Delray?
To qualify for the reserves finals you must have played one game.
If you have played six or more senior games you must have played at least six reserves games.
I think....
With thirds players if they play in seniors and thirds on the same day only the senior game counts. But does this apply to reserves? Could a player be named on the bench in the twos and play seniors. Or does a similiar rule apply to the reserves.
If you have played six or more senior games you must have played at least six reserves games.
I think....
With thirds players if they play in seniors and thirds on the same day only the senior game counts. But does this apply to reserves? Could a player be named on the bench in the twos and play seniors. Or does a similiar rule apply to the reserves.
Delray said:Well well well Yabblett that is news to me and i hope it is true as long as we dont loose ha ha. As for my money come on yabblett u know i dont own a sports store
to many vodka and oranges perhaps delray... was at the dogs cats game last sunday delray and at quarter time realised that the man himself danny delray was the dogs runner provided me with some great humour couldnt believe how alike you both really are....
- Status
