hotchilli
Premium Platinum
- Jun 5, 2021
- 9,522
- 20,145
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Houston Rockets, Houston Astros
Tiffany is painful, please don't drag her through the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The "dilemma" only works if people don't know what decision they have to make, once separated from the other player. We're at episode 2 and players have already gamed the system, planning their choices in advance atop the mountain. Makes a mockery of the entire "dilemma."
Did production not expect players to share the rules back at camp? Wouldn't different dilemmas with different risks/advantages be the obvious way to stop collusion?
Tiffany is painful, please don't drag her through the game.
Honestly not voting Tiffany was extremely stupid. She's:
1. Stupid
2. Not good in challenges (why tf was she not on puzzle duty?)
3. Extremely volatile
With someone like George at least you know his strategic brain is top notch. She genuinely sucks. I like Evie but she made the wrong choice.
From the last Aus Survivor season that finished secondTrying to remember - which one is George?
From the last Aus Survivor season that finished second
To be fair, it was Xander's own flawed decision to divulge about his discovery - he immediately put a target straight on his back. It's as if they've got to blurt it out to try to convince others of their own cleverness, and it never works, especially when their "alliances" are so young and fragile. Historically, the best players would never have gone down that track.The disadvantage to Xander with that idol seems ridiculously unfair. What happens if nobody at the other camps finds the same clue? What happens if they merge into one tribe before all 3 separate clues are found? What if one tribe refuses to open it, after Eevy spilled the beans about the rules? Does Xander never get his vote back?
It's like they don't even think through the consequences of these twists before implementing them. Losing his vote for one Tribal was surely punishment enough.
I know people hated AU Survivor and the excess of dumb twists/advantages, but our version looks restrained next to modern US Survivor.
To be fair, it was Xander's own flawed decision to divulge about his discovery - he immediately put a target straight on his back. It's as if they've got to blurt it out to try to convince others of their own cleverness, and it never works, especially when their "alliances" are so young and fragile. Historically, the best players would never have gone down that track.
They might never know he hasn't voted. Three votes is a majority - they rarely need to read the last one anyway. I'd have kept it hush hush if I were him until he got a better scope of his alliance.In a larger tribe, then yes it’s perhaps it’s more feasible to keep it to himself. However with smaller numbers, one player out of 5 not being able to vote is quite significant. So I almost think he had little alternative but to tell his alliance.
Almost certainly they were placating Tiffany.I'm confused as to why Evvie and Liana didn't just go ahead and vote for Xander if they were sticking with the girls. Evvie knew 100% that Xander didn't have a vote, so at worst it would have been 2-1-1. I think that the other tribes will find their clues next week.
They certainly were, but they showed more patience than I would have. This has left them exposed to the very real possibility that Xander has an idol next week, and an extra vote for the future. In voting him off they could have eliminated the chances of the other 2 tribes activating their idols too. Tiffany was completely irrational, not someone I'd want to partner with.Almost certainly they were placating Tiffany.
I'm just not getting the hate for the contestant selection? For 40 seasons we've had a contrived cross section consisting of primarily beautiful young alphas, and now they when include a stack of people you'd be more likely see on a typical tram ride into the city it's suddenly not representative?
Yeah, probably other sites more than this one revo. Fair bit of criticism around the apparent change of policy in contestant choice for #41.I don't remember reading much hate here about the Cast.
Most people appear to think it's a good cast.