Grant Baker has another article on the drugs side of the investigation in today's Herald-Sun. It begins: "Essendon players now look increasingly certain to escape doping charges.''
The gist of his article is that shoddy records will save them from infraction notices. Baker cites the charging of NRL player Sandor Earl as an example of how quickly ASADA acts when it's got a good case.
Unbelievable, if true. Me smell a rat.
That AFL serial hater Roy Masters had written today:
ASADA is yet to say if players at either Essendon or Cronulla will get infraction notices for taking performance-enhancing drugs.
The Bombers have been co-operative from the start of the joint AFL-ASADA investigation and may qualify for a six-month suspension. The Sharks were initially rebellious but ASADA was happy with the level of co-operation when interviews were completed this month.
While Sharks players might have had five injections each, the possibility exists that some continued to use creams and lozenges after Dank had been asked to leave, or met him away from the club. The AFL's charge sheet states 38 Essendon players got weekly AOD-9604 injections.
Inadequate record keeping at both clubs makes it difficult for ASADA to determine which players were administered with what drugs. If players are suspended, they may take legal action against their clubs for not ensuring a safe workplace.
But any soft sanctions will be appealed by the World Anti-Doping Agency, which will insist Australia - a world leader in the fight against drugs in sport - honour its obligations.
Read more: http://www.watoday.com.au/sport/the-dank-force-the-different-impacts-it-has-had-on-two-clubs-and-two-codes-20130830-2sw95.html#ixzz2dVeWhKGW
Still interesting times ahead.