Uncle_Leo
Premium Gold
So all forms of media should have exactly the same opinion.
Not at all. But most of the opinions on 7 are the same. Lloyd was clearly in favour of Essendon but his views were countered by others. That's fine.
And going by your outstanding synopsis what happened to Darcy and Matthews ?
What happened to them? Nothing, but they were spruiking the Essendon party line the whole way through this.
Channel 7 have far greater issues to address, than their reporting of the Supplements saga.
Such as? It was one of the biggest footy stories ever.
You are on the right site if you want to hear the same opinions regurgitated a million times - Your just in the wrong forum.
I take it you are referring to the Essendon forum?
And it's people like you who want to discuss the supplements saga in every forum thread on BF - We have a board that is dedicated for this discussion - And you sound like Caro - Article from last Friday - let's discuss footy and the finals, but then dedicate 50 to 70% of the article to the supplements sage.
We are discussing the media on this board. Someone mentioned how biased Channel 7 was towards Essendon, I agreed and stated how I saw this. I wasn't actually referring directly to the "supplements scandal" as you put it. I was referring to how it was covered by a station who have 3 ex Essendon players there and 2 sycophants.
I'm not sure why you are bringing Caro into it, the discussion was in regards to Channel 7. The actual "saga" was not being discussed.
There are many great things that happen in AFL footy - Let's discuss them.
Agreed and there are plenty of boards to discuss this.
Now who on the Essendon/Channel 7 payroll are you?