johncitizen
Cancelled
Any chance?
Shaw + 10 + 11 for Adams + Shiel + 1st pick in the 2nd Round
Shaw + 10 + 11 for Adams +Tom Boyd
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Any chance?
Shaw + 10 + 11 for Adams + Shiel + 1st pick in the 2nd Round
How about shaw-10-11 for pick 1?Any chance?
Shaw + 10 + 11 for Adams + Shiel + 1st pick in the 2nd Round
How about we just wait
Shaw + 10 + 11 for Adams +Tom Boyd
Which one is it?How about shaw-10-11 for pick 1?
Desperate times for a new franchise. Here is my photo shop with out doing a photo shop if you get what i mean.
His happy just to go to a good club but also wants the Giants to be in a good position to get a good deal
we'd need to throw the kitchen sink at WS to get pick 1, it would take Shaw and picks 10-11, personally seeing as we're likely to get overs for Shaw (pick 9) I'd prefer to keep our 3 picks, but if we really wanted pick one that is what it would cost us IMO.Which one is it?
I think those 3 would get us Boyd, not Adams included.
Therefore, lets say 10 + 11 become stars, you really have 3 stars out for 1 (Tom Boyd)
Id rather 3 out with 3 in, better quality in the team more chance of being successful.
Hypothetical: Geelong offer their first round pick (around 17) and we offer Shaw for Adams, which do you think the giants would go for?
Would pick 17 help them win more than one game next year?Hypothetical: Geelong offer their first round pick (around 17) and we offer Shaw for Adams, which do you think the giants would go for?
Hypothetical: Geelong offer their first round pick (around 17) and we offer Shaw for Adams, which do you think the giants would go for?
Safe to say it would be Shaw everyday of the week
Would pick 17 help them win more than one game next year?
Really depends on adams, if GWS want shaw so much and are willing to pay him that much to entice him i say we make a huge play for pick 1 and forget about adams. Especially if he wants to go the cats. GWS are screaming out for mature age talent, we should get a package together to get that 1st pick
They will definitely improve lots next year, Cameron will get better which is scary, davis scully ward could take the next step up, all their young midfield stars will improve plenty plus mumford gives them a formidable ruck duo
Id prefer to hold onto 9/10/11 aswell instead of trading all in for Boyd.we'd need to throw the kitchen sink at WS to get pick 1, it would take Shaw and picks 10-11, personally seeing as we're likely to get overs for Shaw (pick 9) I'd prefer to keep our 3 picks, but if we really wanted pick one that is what it would cost us IMO.
Gws have already stated they are unlikely to trade the #1 pick.
IMO was never really going to happen. Just ducks and drakes, particularly as no team was ever going to be willing to throw up a proven superstar for a potential superstar.
Sorry but I don't think that would cut it.
IMO they would only trade pick 1 for pendles/Fyfe/dangerfield/griffin and players of that ilk. Essentially by floating Boyd out there, I think they were hoping on the off chance that they could snag their Ablett.
Was never going to happen and therefore won't happen.
Bingo!Adams for Shaw?