Workshop Template Feedback Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

11825098_854478167981259_1544710029408906421_n.png
11866203_854087714686971_6807462179227641897_n.png
11889538_852786118150464_2976802916238468035_n.png
 
Last edited:

I reckon in the back of your mind Mero, you're thinking how amazing these would look on the site. Sponsors and all. I know Australia's copyright laws sorta suck, but surely the displaying of sponsors can come under 'fair dealing for purpose of research or study'? (Sect. 40 of the Copyright Act 1968)

Failing that, you could potentially host the site in Canada and bypass any Australian law? Mr Eagle, are either of those suggestions actually possible?

It just disappoints me to see sites like HFK and SportsLogos.net displaying sponsors and looking awesome while the AFL still puts a stranglehold on what can and can't be done with this site.
 
I reckon in the back of your mind Mero, you're thinking how amazing these would look on the site. Sponsors and all. I know Australia's copyright laws sorta suck, but surely the displaying of sponsors can come under 'fair dealing for purpose of research or study'? (Sect. 40 of the Copyright Act 1968)

Failing that, you could potentially host the site in Canada and bypass any Australian law? Mr Eagle, are either of those suggestions actually possible?

Possible, yes. Not be challenged by the AFL? Probably not. Not cause Mero any grief at all? Unlikely.

And it's a matter of copyright and trademark. There's at least one mark on that Hawthorn design that is guaranteed to be trademarked in Canada as much as it is Australia.
 
Possible, yes. Not be challenged by the AFL? Probably not. Not cause Mero any grief at all? Unlikely.

And it's a matter of copyright and trademark. There's at least one mark on that Hawthorn design that is guaranteed to be trademarked in Canada as much as it is Australia.

That's true re: your last point. How do these other sites get away with it then? I don't believe there are any sort of deals struck...
 
There's a German apparel sponsor who complained to Big Footy about using their logo, but I suspect most of their concern was being associated with concepts that they did not design. This would be closer to the colours of football and historical kits
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

There's a German apparel sponsor who complained to Big Footy about using their logo, but I suspect most of their concern was being associated with concepts that they did not design. This would be closer to the colours of football and historical kits
Would it sweeten the deal by you offering to allow the league and the clubs concerned non-exclusive use of your images for the purposes of archival and historical display? Maybe the AFL would be more open to you using their IP if they were granted a non-exclusive license to use jumpers from the site
 
Would it sweeten the deal by you offering to allow the league and the clubs concerned non-exclusive use of your images for the purposes of archival and historical display? Maybe the AFL would be more open to you using their IP if they were granted a non-exclusive license to use jumpers from the site
It's actually because of the rights they sold with the website deal. Basically it means no-one else can have AFL ip on their website. The AFL use the site as it is, I don't think they're looking to get permission to use something they think they own.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Workshop Template Feedback Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top