Thank god Ross Lyon didnt get the Carlton job

What you quoted had nothing to do with that. You said Scott said something he didn't. You were proven wrong and you're still salty.

You = Shit

P.S we fielded the youngest side. Games like that will happen. You guys would've lost by 150 🤣

View attachment 2258005

If I can find the link, I'll watch the 30 minute video.

But the results speak for themselves, Brad = Not good (shit)
 
What you quoted had nothing to do with that. You said Scott said something he didn't. You were proven wrong and you're still salty.

You = Shit

P.S we fielded the youngest side. Games like that will happen. You guys would've lost by 150 🤣

View attachment 2258005

So I had a moment today and scrolled back on the AFL app to the story with this video. I listened to the whole 28 minute video and I can tell you, categorically, that at no point did Brad say that the Bombers were a contender. Basically that the changes like Stringer open up a lot of options to see who fits, takes their game to the next level etc. He didn't come out and say "We are shit" but if you read between the lines, you can sort of say that he's hosing down expectations a bit.

It's kind of nuts because it's still year 3 for him, but he's kind of talking almost like year 1 of a rebuild.

Anyway the article DID say that he thinks they can contend this year. So after taking into account all the information.

Brad = Not good
Me = Exonerated
You = Probably in the wrong because I'm not sure you watched the video and if you did, you didn't make it clear enough you had, could have saved me some time.
 
So if Geelong and StKilda both kicked accurate in the last StKilda win by 3 points.
I was wrong. It was 1.2 to 4.4
So it would be 17.6 to 17.9 and Cats would win by 3.
Was also 23 scoring shots to 26.
Not that any of that matters. I was simply saying that they put up about as good a fight as they could outside of scoring accuracy.
 

Thank god Ross Lyon didnt get the Carlton job


Write your reply...
Back
Top