The arrogance and balls of one Nathan Buckley

[JoondalupJ]

No need to apologize, mere fact that you're actually able to type is amazing in itself.

One of the most incoherent, baseless, nothing but hateful tripe OP's I ever seen.

Well he is talking about your team. And Bucks has been known to have an extremely high opinion of himself. So what do you think. Is Buckley a better coach than Mick. Your team your opinion would be good.

 

[Jesus Baulks]

Well he is talking about your team. And Bucks has been known to have an extremely high opinion of himself. So what do you think. Is Buckley a better coach than Mick. Your team your opinion would be good.

Buckley doesn't have to be better than Mick, he just has to be better than Scott, Ratten, Clarkson and co which he no doubt is

So at the end of the day we have the two best coaches in the league watching over the team. Scary huh?

 

[you idiot sheehan]

if he moved out of self interest he'd pass this up as he is on a total hiding to nothing.
Malthouse will get all the credit while Collingwood continue to win and Buckley will be held responsible when they start to lose (as inevitably aging sides do).

Most likely, he'll inherit a still performing team that fails to win 2012. They will compete again in 2013 and then be likely to be out of the top four for at least three to five years.

First time coach getting renewed after five years of diminishing returns with Scotty Burns, Tarkyn Lockyer and a long list of (dual) premiership players after his gig?

Best of luck Bucks.

Arrgh sorry mate, do you mind telling me how Collingwood's list is ageing? It's probably younger than Sydney's. Do you even know anything about Collingwood's list?