The Bigfooty Liverpool Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Would anyone complain if we sold Nunez and brought in Cunha instead?
Sounds like Arsenal are after him. We've been linked with Marmoush for 33mil (Currently with 18 goals and 12 assists this season for Frankfurt).
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Look , with the likely scenario of Trent leaving... Who would we chase to fill his spot?
I'd buy a CB and just have Bradley and Gomez RB. Maybe Luca Stephenson as well as 3rd choice.
 
I'd buy a CB and just have Bradley and Gomez RB. Maybe Luca Stephenson as well as 3rd choice.
The thing is we been lucky with Trent, his accuracy in hitting targets to players is the biggest thing will hurt us.. As Bradley is as good as defender compare to Trent..
Can we find one ( like Gomez ) that can play RB and LB?
 
Iv never herd of him until I looked him up. From Dundee United?
He played for us in pre-season and looked really good defensively, can also play in midfield.

Dundee United have been playing him as a wing back it looks like.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The negligence of allowing 3 of your best players to approach the final 6 months of their contracts while still in their prime is squarely on the club
There are extenuating circumstances though. Klopp announcing he was leaving half way through last season made it hard. I'm petty confident VVD and Salah will play on. I also think it would be hard for TAA to leave. But if he does so be it - Bradley is ready made.
 
There are extenuating circumstances though. Klopp announcing he was leaving half way through last season made it hard. I'm petty confident VVD and Salah will play on. I also think it would be hard for TAA to leave. But if he does so be it - Bradley is ready made.

Players shouldn't be allowed to run their contracts below 2 years, we should've been much more proactive in renewing them ages ago. FSG has a long history of just letting players run down contracts, it is squarely on them
 
Players shouldn't be allowed to run their contracts below 2 years, we should've been much more proactive in renewing them ages ago. FSG has a long history of just letting players run down contracts, it is squarely on them
Yeah and it's funny to me, you can tell they are cheap cos they dont wanna fork out contracts but by not giving out contracts they end up losing players for free with no incoming fees.

Damned if they do, damned if they dont.

But surely it's better to have VVD, Mo and TAA than not. Dumbass FSG.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The Bigfooty Liverpool Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top