The Bulldogs and Umpires: Time for a Royal Commission?

Remove this Banner Ad

long list of matches
bulldogs vs gcs today
bulldogs vs hawthorn last week
bulldogs vs adelaide pannell 17-1
bulldogs vs sydney grand final
bulldogs vs gws prelim
bulldogs vs north 2017 x2
+ more

There was a game against them a few years ago where we only received 4 frees for the entire match.
 
I have said it for a while. The umpires love them. Back in 2016 it was all free kick Hawthorn but that's because Hawthorn were hated/top and everyone wanted to bring them down. In reality, it was the Dogs getting away with murder. For whatever reason they seem to be everyone's 2nd team so no one really complained. We were crucified in that semi. Dogs were the better team but they still every decision which wasnt 100% seem to go their way. Ask any Sydney supporters about the granny too

Last week, there has been much said about the umpiring in the last qtr but the first 3 were just as bad. When you have neutral supporters saying Hawthorn have been screwed by the umps you know something is off

Not saying there is anything untoward or corrupt but for whatever reason they get the rub off the green
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The debate about the 2016 GF umpiring is sad, they wouldn't have even made it that far if the GWS Prelim was umpired fairly.

The prelim umpiring was worse than the gf, which seems impossible.
When a player doesn't receive a 50m penalty for an opponent not just encroaching on the protected zone, but literally running into him, it's pretty obvious there's something suss going on.
 
The free kick count doesn’t have to be even - but on a side note, if it IS, it’s probably a fair indicator straight up that there is no grand conspiracy towards one team of another

While a consistently massive differential against one team is purely due to their game style...Even though when other teams copied said style last year, they got hugely different results from the umps.
 
While a consistently massive differential against one team is purely due to their game style...Even though when other teams copied said style last year, they got hugely different results from the umps.

I’m not arguing one way or the other when it comes to the Dogs - I couldn’t give less f***s if I tried.

I’m merely pointing out that anyone bringing up the relevance of a level free kick count should be mindful of the fact that if there is a concerted effort to be biased towards one team, a level free kick count probably won’t happen.

In other words, a lopsided free kick count doesn’t necessarily prove that umpires are biased, but an even one should prove that they aren’t biased
 
I thought the umpires would have jumped off the Dogs after helping to break their premiership drought but they are still doing their best to help them.

I don't think they play that differently to other teams, they have a few guys that are good at milking frees like Toby McLean with his ducking tactics but mostly they just get more soft frees or 50/50 calls going their way. than other teams. Why that is I don't know, they aren't a big club with a lot of supporters so there really shouldn't be any incentive for the AFL to try to get them into finals like one of the big 4 clubs.

Pot, meet kettle.

If you are a good team and are better than your opposition you will generally get more free kicks as you are usually first to the ball and making most of the play.
 
Pot, meet kettle.

I made that comment back in 2009 or 2010 when we were one of the best teams and deserved to get the better of the umpiring.

The Biulldogs continue to enjoy a charmed run with the umpires despite being a bog ordinary side.

I'm not the only one that has noticed how much your club has been favoured by the umpires the last few years, hence why this thread was created.
 
I made that comment back in 2009 or 2010 when we were one of the best teams and deserved to get the better of the umpiring.

The Biulldogs continue to enjoy a charmed run with the umpires despite being a bog ordinary side.

I'm not the only one that has noticed how much your club has been favoured by the umpires the last few years, hence why this thread was created.

So how do you explain why the Swans and Hawthorn get such a bad deal from the umpires (as the table in this thread shows) despite being two of the better performed clubs over the last 10 years.
 
Christ - West Coast +900 over 16 years. Multiple players, coaches, strategies, form-lines over that time period. I thought maybe a symptom of the 'house of pain' cauldron, but the same statistics don't apply to Fremantle?

Has to be the Hungry Jacks mafia threatening to kill umpires wives and children
Arriving at his address

Copy - target sighted - hes in the living room

Head shot - hes pink mist - exfil to perth now
 
Not as incredible as +919 over the last decade or so.

Not a SINGLE year where you didn't win the freekick differential.

View attachment 649896

All that table proves is free kicks mean **** all compared to how the team plays.

Hawks and Swans with the cats are the 3 best sides of the last 16 years.
Although the WC is pretty hilarious, that can't be coincidence.
 
So how do you explain why the Swans and Hawthorn get such a bad deal from the umpires (as the table in this thread shows) despite being two of the better performed clubs over the last 10 years.

Hawthorn got a bad deal from the umpires? They were looked after quite nicely during their threepeat from memory.

The Swans got looked after too until GWS arrived, the AFL was like Michael Jackson losing interest in a teenager as soon as he had a new kid on the scene.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hawthorn got a bad deal from the umpires? They were looked after quite nicely during their threepeat from memory.

The Swans got looked after too until GWS arrived, the AFL was like Michael Jackson losing interest in a teenager as soon as he had a new kid on the scene.

By your logic though Hawthorn and the swans should have been well looked after as 2 of the 3 best performed teams from the last 10 years. They were the first to the ball and making most of the play - yadda yadda. Yet, as the table in this thread shows they are the two most penalised teams (free kick differential) in the league.
 
By your logic though Hawthorn and the swans should have been well looked after as 2 of the 3 best performed teams from the last 10 years. They were the first to the ball and making most of the play - yadda yadda. Yet, as the table in this thread shows they are the two most penalised teams (free kick differential) in the league.

The stats don't tell the whole story, Hawthorn got favourable treatment in big games at important times, the 2012 prelim against Adelaide for example.

The Swans haven't been favoured by the umpires since GWS came in, they got screwed by the umpires in the 2012 GF and then murdered in the 2016 GF.

Neither of those clubs compare to the Bulldogs or the Eaqles in terms of umpire love, the free kick stats in recent years show that they're the favouriite pets.
 
The debate about the 2016 GF umpiring is sad, they wouldn't have even made it that far if the GWS Prelim was umpired fairly.

GWS deserved to lose. They got smashed in the midfield, 68 i50s to 45. They tried to play the man and not the ball. Plus they were only in it because of our replacement backline players coughing up gimme goals. We have less injuries and we win comfortably, so any luck on the part of umpiring is balanced by injury luck.
 
Last edited:
Where are you #freekickhawthorn folks ?

hawthorn never got an advantage like the dogs.. hawthorn just won close games for years so haters couldnt cope and scrutinised certain free kicks throughout those matches blaming umpires when the whole time it was game management , experienced [players and good coaching, u will be hard pressed to ever find lop sided free kick differentials involving hawthorn like the bulldogs get oh and lets not mention touching doggies players with open hands or grand finals.
 
The stats don't tell the whole story, Hawthorn got favourable treatment in big games at important times, the 2012 prelim against Adelaide for example..

Given we have the 2nd lowest free kick count I assume we were getting reamed at all those other times when it wasnt important?

With fairer free kicks we would have been winning by 3 or 4 goals instead of 3 or 4 points. There wouldnt have been big moments.

Dont tell me.... youre that guy? Was it right in front of you?
 
Given we have the 2nd lowest free kick count I assume we were getting reamed at all those other times when it wasnt important?

With fairer free kicks we would have been winning by 3 or 4 goals instead of 3 or 4 points. There wouldnt have been big moments.

Dont tell me.... youre that guy? Was it right in front of you?

I am happy to admit FreeKickHawthorn does not exist unless it's against the Swans according to the Table.
 
I am happy to admit FreeKickHawthorn does not exist unless it's against the Swans according to the Table.

Well, youd probably need to look at head to head games but its pretty clear that some teams consistently get more than fair and some consistently get unfair.

The problem is people focus on a single call at a single point in a game and ignore the dozens of other times when free kicks were or were not paid. Or when marks were called when it wasnt a mark, etc.

The idea that umpires only influence the game for a few seconds is ridiculous.
 
Well, youd probably need to look at head to head games but its pretty clear that some teams consistently get more than fair and some consistently get unfair.

The problem is people focus on a single call at a single point in a game and ignore the dozens of other times when free kicks were or were not paid. Or when marks were called when it wasnt a mark, etc.

The idea that umpires only influence the game for a few seconds is ridiculous.

Yeah I am only stirring.

Even in the 2016 GF where we did genuinely get the rough end of the stick we still missed I think 3 kickable shots at goal in the first 10-15 minutes of the game that could have changed the whole momentum of the game.

You are going to get a bad run at times but the good teams overcome that
 
Pfft

As time goes by the myths get stronger. I'll allow it though, it's all you'll have for a long time.

I was at the game and didnt think it was heavily one sided. The problem is in 50/50 situations the Dogs seem to get the rub 80/20.

Carey is generally an idiot but he is right when he says 50/50 should just be Play On.
 
I was at the game and didnt think it was heavily one sided. The problem is in 50/50 situations the Dogs seem to get the rub 80/20.

Carey is generally an idiot but he is right when he says 50/50 should just be Play On.
I was there too, and have no bitch with the umps. It was the other nonsense I was responding to.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The Bulldogs and Umpires: Time for a Royal Commission?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top