Opinion The 'Carlton related stuff that doesn't need it's own thread' thread Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just listened to Andrew Russells full interview. That was really something else. Could listen to that over and over again.
Just a shame Derm had to turn it into a discussion about Hawthorn at the end.
He's not there anymore...**** off Derm
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I got mine, but then I moved house and I don't know quite what happened to it.

:huh:

BTW, I miss the old emoticons on this website. That one is overly large, devoid of character, and only insisting on the barest essence of the mild sadness that it should connotate. Bring back the old emoticons, Chief!
 
Boring day or a genuine passion?
I'm just gonna keep posting to push the thread to the dreaded page 404...
Fighting with myself to actually do the geography component of a humanities teaching unit. That, and the old emoticons - especially the sad one - were way better.
 
Just on the Dustin incidents....wtf were the umpires doing? The only thing our players would have done is given away a free kick in the end as being the 2nd person in. Again what were the umpires looking at and why has the tribunal review not addressed this? Just not good enough!!!!
 
Fighting with myself to actually do the geography component of a humanities teaching unit. That, and the old emoticons - especially the sad one - were way better.
I'm contemplating advising prospective guests that my establishment will re-open for normal business soon.
On the other hand I have got quite used to this Basil Fawlty style of management, whereby everything runs a lot more smoothly when people just stay away!
I'd go with the emoticon soliloquy in your shoes...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Nah they didn't post them this year. Have to pick them up at one of the games OH WAIT or from the Carlton shop
They paying for Numb3rs to fly from Adelaide?
 
Just on the Dustin incidents....wtf were the umpires doing? The only thing our players would have done is given away a free kick in the end as being the 2nd person in. Again what were the umpires looking at and why has the tribunal review not addressed this? Just not good enough!!!!
Same as it always is and always has been. One rule for the good players, another for the mortals.

We get better, we'll get the same treatment. The trick is to play smart; get your revenge in kind, when the ump's back is turned. You need to have a memory in footy. They drive your head into the deck with their boot or heel, you dump them so hard their coach can feel it when you next get an opportunity.
 
Same as it always is and always has been. One rule for the good players, another for the mortals.

We get better, we'll get the same treatment. The trick is to play smart; get your revenge in kind, when the ump's back is turned. You need to have a memory in footy. They drive your head into the deck with their boot or heel, you dump them so hard their coach can feel it when you next get an opportunity.

Bet you we don't, as it's happened for centuries. Coaches like Clarkson, Scott, Hardwick get their sides 'to do' things with the umpires assistance - don't ask me how - but I doubt Teague will. Let's review after one of our guys gets 6+ weeks (G Williams / C Judd style) - shall we? :thumbsu:
 
Same as it always is and always has been. One rule for the good players, another for the mortals.

We get better, we'll get the same treatment. The trick is to play smart; get your revenge in kind, when the ump's back is turned. You need to have a memory in footy. They drive your head into the deck with their boot or heel, you dump them so hard their coach can feel it when you next get an opportunity.

And then hit them again .. just to make sure they remembered the first one ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top