that ain't punching above his weight.Yep... massive congrats to the weapon. He does need to write an instructional book about how to punch above your weight though
Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
that ain't punching above his weight.Yep... massive congrats to the weapon. He does need to write an instructional book about how to punch above your weight though
Liking the Carlton inclusions but a terrible team. 5tall defenders and 4 tall forwards. Would get killed on the spreadESPN's 2024 mid-year All-Australian team: Who makes the cut? Who misses out?
It's that time of year when we perform just about the most difficult task in football - settling on 23 players for ESPN's 2024 mid-year All-Australian team. Find out who made the cut.www.espn.com.au
Weitering, Cripps, curnow, McKay
Apparently so MebbyIs the game against Essendon sold out?
damn, HBF didn't get himself a ticket the silly bananaApparently so Mebby
damn, HBF didn't get himself a ticket the silly banana
Thanks friend but too many dollar bucks for us!AFL - Round 13 - Essendon v Carlton
AFL - Round 13 - Essendon v Carlton Melbourne 09 Jun 2024 Tickets. See the best AFL teams in Australia come together to play the matches of the year. Playing at the best venues across Australia. Get your tickets today from The Ticket Merchant.www.theticketmerchant.com.au
How much is a ticket these days ?Thanks friend but too many dollar bucks for us!
Cheapest is $119 on the resale siteHow much is a ticket these days ?
You think this is bad, you should see the NRL.If Laura Kane wanted to do something really easy to get a tick off from fans and make the comp fairer, she should make sure all teams play each other in the first 18 rounds before the six double ups. Tell the nerd doing the fixture it is not at all hard and don't take any pathetic excuses on why it needs to be done any other way. Play Cats a second time in about 8 weeks without having played half the bottom sides.
Can’t believe teams also get 2 premiership points for a bye, makes absolutely zero sense…You think this is bad, you should see the NRL.
There are times where the same teams will play each other twice in the opening six/seven weeks of the season.
You're right though, shouldn't be that difficult.
It sounds like the Colin Carter proposal to have VFA premierships from 1877 to 1896 recognised for those current AFL/VFL sides who played in the VFA competition at that time, is going to be ratified by the AFL Commission.
I for one agree with this as the VFA competition at that time (1877 to 1896) was the most senior and preeminent football competition at that time and their was no higher premiership available to be won.
For Carlton this means our premiership record will be 18 as the VFA premierships of 1877 and 1887 will count (their is an argument that our pre-VFA premierships of 1871,1873,1874,1875 should count as well but that’s an argument for another time ).
So all that’s left to be said bring on number 19.
It's not the VFL/AFL and should not count for this competition. We can count our 6 pre-VFL flags in our own history, but the AFL shouldn't count any of them.
Should Port be able to count their million SANFL flags?
Would also put Essendon on 20, Collingwood and Geelong on 17. Don't like it. Unless they want to go back further and include the 1870-76 era (which would bring us to 22).It sounds like the Colin Carter proposal to have VFA premierships from 1877 to 1896 recognised for those current AFL/VFL sides who played in the VFA competition at that time, is going to be ratified by the AFL Commission.
I for one agree with this as the VFA competition at that time (1877 to 1896) was the most senior and preeminent football competition at that time and their was no higher premiership available to be won.
For Carlton this means our premiership record will be 18 as the VFA premierships of 1877 and 1887 will count (their is an argument that our pre-VFA premierships of 1871,1873,1874,1875 should count as well but that’s an argument for another time ).
So all that’s left to be said bring on number 19.
No they shouldn’t as the SANFL was not the most preeminent competition at that time.
The VFA between 1877 and 1896 was the preeminent football competition at the time and no higher prize could be won at the time than the VFA premiership.
And we get some of those bottom sides hitting peak form like Hawks, Weagles playing better at home, North (for a second time showing upside), Bulldogs starting to get into the groove, and even Tigers next week may not be a lay down monty either as they're also showing some up side at times. I think we've just had a season where most timings of our games (except for Good Friday) has resulted in us meeting our opponents at least opportune times from our point of view (injuries and form)If Laura Kane wanted to do something really easy to get a tick off from fans and make the comp fairer, she should make sure all teams play each other in the first 18 rounds before the six double ups. Tell the nerd doing the fixture it is not at all hard and don't take any pathetic excuses on why it needs to be done any other way. Play Cats a second time in about 8 weeks without having played half the bottom sides.
Would also put Essendon on 20, Collingwood and Geelong on 17. Don't like it. Unless they want to go back further and include the 1870-76 era (which would bring us to 22).
There were times when the SA competition or SA clubs were better than VFL clubs. It's not like it was just a century of complete dominance.
The VFA is an ongoing competition. They already count our VFA flags in their history. The rival VFL competition can't adopt those as part of its own records.
Our first VFA flag, the first VFA season had 5 teams including Hotham and Albert Park. How do you count that as a VFL/AFL flag but at the same time say that Hotham and Albert Park were never part of the competition. It's ridiculously messy and opens up a massive can of worms.
The SA competition should not be counted as it did not morph into the VFL.
Its wrong to talk about "the rival VFL" competion because during the period 1877-1896 there was no rival VFL competition - the only and preeminent competition in existence at the time was the VFA, and those clubs who played in that VFA competition could not play any other more senior competition.
I'm also not saying that Hotham and Albert Park were never part of the VFA competition - they were part of the competition - just like University were part of the VFL between 1908 to 1914, they never won premierships so really its a moot point.