That makes sense, never rated his football ability.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
I thought he was referring to someone else but maybe that's a long bow.That makes sense, never rated his football ability.
And then Hawthorn were for the taking and our 5th premiership was entirely possible. How things could have changed. But the umpires thought otherwise. Only the '94 prelim was worse and will always be worse, even if we play footy for another 50 years.Blowing up the list after the 2015 prelim which we could have won if not for being wasteful in the first quarter and umpiring
Now I’ve heard it all. Absolute rubbish
Ok , it wasn't Brad's decision to axe those players, 100% wasn't. I don't like him one bit, never did, but that isn't true.
There was a certain person involved who I wont name. But he's a ****wit when one considers his role and his inability to string a coherent sentence together.
He had no right to that role, yes he didn't give himself the job Buckley would have, I assume and whoever called out Buckley as a poor choice when he was announced was 100% correct. Someone did from memory.
View attachment 2001498
FFS, FMD & FML - he was Footballer Director, probably deserves an LOL. I'd have done a much better job.
And why TF would they entertain me for that gig, they wouldn't I'm not qualified, just like the silly prick who got the job.
And lol for business demands, his role and only role was/is to organise the booze.
And Cunners didn't want to retire, but was pushed by the other imbecile Rawling.
And you can add "" to the last two sentences.
We all know we could do with Cunners now. Heads need to role.
Is it? Crucial. Admit it. You insinuated that Euge was somehow to blame for our current plight. One of the more imbecilic takes I’ve read on BigFooty. :stern lookThe word "some" is crucial there.
I understand you've got some weird pathological dislike of Brady Rawlings, it doesn't stand up to any scrutiny, but here we are, you making odd personal attacks.
This is one of those times when I truly hate this place
Dirty wordW A R C H E S T
It's not.It’s simple.
The club is more than one person and a couple of failed FA attempts 8 years ago. Cheap scapegoating is, well, cheap scapegoating. E.g. Not mentioning any of Ben Buckley, Ben Amarfio, Any board members of that time, Cam Joyce, Jack Ziebell etc etc in your 2017 blame game is some bizarre whitewashing.
Spot on.
Our "aggressive reset" had all the subtlety and cunning of throwing cash at everyone and when that didn't work it was going to the draft with just the picks we earned for being rubbish. Then, when that failed to yield instant results it was to clog the list with Polec, Tyson, Pittard and Hall. And when that didn't work Brad went to the board with "let's rebuild."
2017-2019... the wasted years.
I think most agree with the strategy as a whole. The fact it is our 3rd go at it (tying in with your point on coaching) and IMO our poor talent ID has stalled progress.It’s simple. We made a decision to strip the list to get access to high end talent. It is a shithouse strategy due to the pain you go through, but will likely work out.
It has been prolonged by poor coaching choices and some bad luck (eg TT).
We will get out of it if we stay the course with Clarkson and Viney. That doesn’t mean they will get us a flag, but they will restore culture and standards.
All in charge at the time this strategy was agreed - coach, board, leadership are accountable for our current predicament.
I would also point out that I think over 50% of Bigfooty advocated for this strategy as opposed to competing for bottom end of finals each year.
Taken on board Horace.Stop casting aspersions on people, who have no right of reply.
And lets be honest, you spend most of your time compiling posts full of innuendo.
Its very easy to write these things on a football forum where everyone is (allegedly) anonymous. Gutless on your part.
Glenn Archer was appointed Football Director in 2015. Is he the person you are referring to? If so go and confront him.
This is one of those times when I truly hate this place
I think things started to unravel when Scotts was sniffing around Gold Coast gig and we then extended him. We should have moved on once he started looking elsewhere.
It’s simple. We made a decision to strip the list to get access to high end talent. It is a shithouse strategy due to the pain you go through, but will likely work out.
It has been prolonged by poor coaching choices and some bad luck (eg TT).
We will get out of it if we stay the course with Clarkson and Viney. That doesn’t mean they will get us a flag, but they will restore culture and standards.
All in charge at the time this strategy was agreed - coach, board, leadership are accountable for our current predicament.
I would also point out that I think over 50% of Bigfooty advocated for this strategy as opposed to competing for bottom end of finals each year.
Taken on board Horace.
I will be more circumspect in the future.
One my fav all time players fwiw.
I think the point is by the time we were tossing huge checks at people in 2017, the renewal ship had already sailed.Certainly, there were aging players that still had value in 2015 and we could have secured reasonable draft or trade capital by moving them on back then. By the time we went nuclear, nobody had any value so we were having to replenish the list with a poor draft hand.
I think this feeds back into the OP's point to some extent. Once we started the ground-up rebuild, we were already pretty rooted, and we needed 5 years' worth of top-end draft picks to complete the job. Having effectively missed the target in 2020 (Will Phillips) and 2021 (JHF), we are now just 2 years into that process
Crikey, Horace is the King of BF if he can keep you in check.....Taken on board Horace.
I will be more circumspect in the future.
One my fav all time players fwiw.
After 1998 lost we move on Wayne Schwass, that move won us the 99 flag.Blowing up the list after the 2015 prelim which we could have won if not for being wasteful in the first quarter and umpiring
Now I’ve heard it all. Absolute rubbish
Yes true enough but I suspect if someone at the club had proposed moving on any player that we, the supporters, had become emotionally attached to, this place would have gone into meltdown. Afterall, there were melts over Sam Durdin being delisted. Imagine if we tried to move on a peak Goldstein, Tarrant, Brown, Wells or L. Thomas. Funnily enough, each of those players went elsewhere but after they had any trade value.I think the point is by the time we were tossing huge checks at people in 2017, the renewal ship had already sailed.
Take a look at the number of good players Collingwood has moved on, Grundy, Treloar, Adams, Ginnivan, Stevens just to name a few.
Under Scott we kept players on the list for years that were never going to make it and never did.
You can either manage your renewal or have it thrust on you.
People at the club clearly became emotional attached to players, rather than exercising the cold calculations that builds Flag winning teams.