The graveyard thread for endless off topic posturing on persons causing bi-polar responses

Remove this Banner Ad

Half our supporter base believes we ‘got Rozee for him’. It’s become the opposite of ‘we traded Lonie for Pick 14! HURRRR’.

I'm not the biggest Wingard fan but if we did get Rozee for him, right now, we lost that deal.
 
We traded pick 6 up to pick 5. Took Rozee with 5. If we don't do that and someone else takes Rozee at pick 5 instead, we end up with Ben King or Bailey Smith. Both big upgrades at this point in time.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

We traded pick 6 up to pick 5. Took Rozee with 5. If we don't do that and someone else takes Rozee at pick 5 instead, we end up with Ben King or Bailey Smith. Both big upgrades at this point in time.
With different coaches and game plans. People tend to disregard how good we are at not getting the best out of our players.
 
With different coaches and game plans. People tend to disregard how good we are at not getting the best out of our players.

This is the thing. We still have Rucci and Whateley and associated Hinkley fanbois in the media giving him endless gobbies for what has been limited success — especially in light of the rest of the comp during his reign — but the negatives are almost completely swept under the rug to the point of non-existent.

It’s bizarre.

The infinite kudos for the Rozee/Burton/Butters/Duursma/Georgiades captures at the expense of Wingard/Pittard/Polec/Howard is one example: all told, how big a win is that really?

Meanwhile, the mammoth salary outlay for Rockliff/Motlop/Watts for negligible value isn’t even discussed, let alone criticised. It just happened, and yeah, so what? Davies is a wheeling and dealing god!

Is it any wonder we just lurch along from year to year.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The graveyard thread for endless off topic posturing on persons causing bi-polar responses

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top