Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
anyone watch Louis Theroux last night - the most hated family in America (Westboro Baptist)?? Similar stuff dressing yer kid up making him stand outside Fed Court!
So you are leaving out LU's comment about Hardie being a goose ??? Guess that doesn't bode well for your "foamer" lead shit-throwing within the thread ...............
(again a response to LU)
So you are objecting to the way that Hardie is perceived on BF (by both the "Foamers" and the "Hirdites". A guy who has himself started arguments about how people on BF are basically scum ??? Why are you so concerned about Mr Hardie's feelings ???
Of course that gets you whatever you want. People just fall over I at the champion footballer.Just the vibe of the thing,
After all Hirdy is a legend footy player.
What is the meaning of the full federal court decision?
Obviously if it dismisses the appeal - Middleton's verdict is final (High court aside)
However if they agree with the appeal - does that overturn Middleton's decision entirely - or simply re-generate another trial.
Can't they appeal to God?Depends on what the Full Bench decision says - they can overturn Middleton's decision entirely, or in part. That won't generate another trial at Federal Court level, however. Next stop is the High Court.
And, after that, the Hird's might try and see whether the now defunct Privy Council can be accessed
First optional protocol with UNHCR?Depends on what the Full Bench decision says - they can overturn Middleton's decision entirely, or in part. That won't generate another trial at Federal Court level, however. Next stop is the High Court.
And, after that, the Hird's might try and see whether the now defunct Privy Council can be accessed
You're a connoisseur I see. blackcat awards you max hipster cred.
Forget dumplings. Almond croissants are the new black.
Ablett Senior unlikely to come back and play and even if he did wouldn't go near the BombersCan't they appeal to God?
Neo-liberalIs hanks a liberal?
And here I was thinking Hird would think it was a conflict of interest.Ablett Senior unlikely to come back and play and even if he did wouldn't go near the Bombers
Hard for hird to appeal to himselfCan't they appeal to God?
Can't they appeal to God?
Or does one escape the neoliberalist apparatus on a seakayak? Article for the LIV journal maybe....Does ASADA monitor competitive seakayaking?
Very unlikely to be agreed to.The thought of Hird taking this to the high court is mouth watering...
Ian Hanke?Neo-liberal
What makes you believe he is not guilty?Sums up the HTB quite nicely.
Doesn't matter what the end result is.
Hird is guilty.
The vibeWhat makes you believe he is not guilty?
I'll admit, I did get a kick out of it
Haha, a very long bow to draw but found it funny anyway.
This trial has nothing to do with Hirds guilt. However, it certainly gives the impression you are guilty if you are trying to bury truthful admissions you made whether you were forced to give them or not. The lawfulness of the investigation is obviously a technicality. That is why we are at an appeal stage of the Federal Court. It isn't clear to even the full bench.Sums up the HTB quite nicely.
Doesn't matter what the end result is.
Hird is guilty.
Can't they appeal to God?