![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/north_melbourne.png)
- Dec 27, 2017
- 25,289
- 55,859
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Why not???????????
Election will likely be decided by about 800k suburban "soccer Moms" spread across eight states.
They despise Trump's behaviour with women.
Because she’s a terrible person.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney Swans vs GWS Giants - 3:20PM Sat - 1st QF
Squiggle tips Swans at 63% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
LIVE: Brisbane Lions vs Carlton - 7:30PM Sat - 1st EF
Squiggle tips Lions at 73% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why not???????????
Election will likely be decided by about 800k suburban "soccer Moms" spread across eight states.
They despise Trump's behaviour with women.
Because she’s a terrible person.
Explain why you think she's a terrible person. Especially compared to corrupt felon and sexual abuser Donald Trump.
Won't happen, but I would love to see Buttigieg as the VP pick.
"Yeah, he's a white male. A gay white male. From the mid-west."
Already have.
I know Trump is a terrible person, but his supporters don’t care.
The dude responsible for those train crashes?
Very few politicians are not terrible people. It comes with the desire to seek such positions. Would her opponent have done any differently in the same position? Be that Trump or any other Republican.Just means they can’t pretend to be the moral candidate. She’s a terrible person. The Democrats have also lost any credibility after gaslighting people into believing that Biden wasn’t losing his mind.
All you've mentioned is her record as a District Attorney 22~ years ago.
You think that (and that alone?) makes her a 'terrible person'?
Because she’s a terrible person.
Very few politicians are not terrible people. It comes with the desire to seek such positions. Would her opponent have done any differently in the same position? Be that Trump or any other Republican.
Unless she is campaigning to continue the incarceration of recreational weed smokers, or to weaken due process for those on death row, I don't really see the relevance.
The system is ****ed with a multitude of injustices. The ****wit politicians on either side of the divide will have little effect on these issues unless there are groundswells for change they cannot ignore.
Society improves in spite of politicians not via them. Whether it's marriage equality, indigenous rights, child abuse or domestic violence, politicians follow community attitudes they do not lead change. At best they provide another stage within the community for these debates to be enacted.
Won't happen, but I would love to see Buttigieg as the VP pick.
"Yeah, he's a white male. A gay white male. From the mid-west."
Exactly.And he's now the useless old bastard too.
I've never met her so can't judge, but the persona she presents certainly isn't "terrible person".
She's going to generate horrible attacks from right wing white men (not saying you are btw) that will actually benefit her cause.
Fundamentally election is now The Old America v The New America.
Old' CIA Pete not my cup of tea. But I know what you mean about the LOLZ it would ensue.
Who do you see as her running mate - presume we're agreed it'll be a straight white male "heartland" guy much like Biden was for Obama.
The world would have been so different. 9/11 may not have happened, or if it did the response may have been more intelligent. We'd have had 20 years of worldwide effective action on climate change. No Dubya trying to implement his daddy's New World Order. A very different world.I know what you mean, but Obama ran on the I'm Contemporary America ticket successfully in 08 and 12.
Clinton in 92 and 96 as well.
One of the real "sliding doors" moments is if the Dems play hardball in 2000 and don't let the Republicans steal the election.
Why? East Palestine wasn't a one off incident and nothing has really changed on that front.That's such a ridiculous claim it doesn't even deserve a response, tbh.
Especially if she runs with Forrest Gump from Kentucky like old Mau Mau mate suggested in that tweet you posted.
Why? East Palestine wasn't a one off incident and nothing has really changed on that front.
Of course she can, politicians do it all the time. She will simply ignore any attacks on that front, and an insignificant number of Americans will care.It means she can’t pretend to be a good person. Trump is a bad person but nothing sticks.
This is the problem imo, they need to realise they can’t put Trump in the shit suit because it doesn’t matter. They already have the anti trump vote.
They all pretend to be good people. Dubya allowed the execution of nearly 150 people in the five years he was Texas Governor. Only one of those people had anything vaguely resembling proper representation at their sentencing. You could find other shit on him and anyone else who runs for or has ever run for US president.It means she can’t pretend to be a good person. Trump is a bad person but nothing sticks.
This is the problem imo, they need to realise they can’t put Trump in the shit suit because it doesn’t matter. They already have the anti trump vote.