Sounds like Baileys footskill has let him down
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good on you for weathering all the storms. Sounds very heroic!LOL
Give it up mate, you can't possibly be trying to defend Banfield this time.
I weathered the storm when I called for Taberener to be dropped and that turned out to be the right call.
I'll weather this storm too.
Do you always celebrate and defend the team when they lose? That's a guaranteed recipe for success.
Well, when I'm right. I'm right.Good on you for weathering all the storms. Sounds very heroic!
On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Would you stop self fellating yourself.Well, when I'm right. I'm right.
Got nothing to do with being heroic, but I'm gunna cop flack for suggesting Banfield is dead wood, along with Taberener and Hughes, and needs to be cut off.
And that's fine, when the teams better off without these spuds, I'm not gunna want a pat on the back and a "you were right". The results will be vindication enough for me.
Thanks for your time.
So in summary, you support Banfield, will continue to do so, but want to support him from afar?As perhaps one of Banners biggest supporters, I'm disappointed. Yes, disappointed about him giving away that unnecessary 50 at a crucial point in the game, but also he has now allowed his haters to come out of the woodwork with vitriol and direct all the blame of the loss and season on him.
His first half was good, not sure what happened in the second. However, I feel that htb on the wing, then fumble in the fwd line led to increase frustration and drop in confidence in game. He probably is mentally aware each and every mistake he makes is scrutinized 10 fold.
I still believe banners can be b22 for Freo. However, to do that, I don't think he should be playing fwd predominantly. Also, I think he is overthinking it a bit too much now, rather than the freedom of the earlier games where he was better.
Anyway, I'll continue to support banners even with the heat. I did so last year, when everyone was bagging him then. But although I would like him to remain at Freo as he does bleed purple, for his career it's perhaps better he gets a fresh start at another club, where the scrutiny is not as he gets here.
Yeah, maybe I am.Would you stop self fellating yourself.
You sound like a total narcissist.
As perhaps one of Banners biggest supporters, I'm disappointed. Yes, disappointed about him giving away that unnecessary 50 at a crucial point in the game, but also he has now allowed his haters to come out of the woodwork with vitriol and direct all the blame of the loss and season on him.
His first half was good, not sure what happened in the second. However, I feel that htb on the wing, then fumble in the fwd line led to increase frustration and drop in confidence in game. He probably is mentally aware each and every mistake he makes is scrutinized 10 fold.
I still believe banners can be b22 for Freo. However, to do that, I don't think he should be playing fwd predominantly. Also, I think he is overthinking it a bit too much now, rather than the freedom of the earlier games where he was better.
Anyway, I'll continue to support banners even with the heat. I did so last year, when everyone was bagging him then. But although I would like him to remain at Freo as he does bleed purple, for his career it's perhaps better he gets a fresh start at another club, where the scrutiny is not as he gets here.
Didn't say he should be offered a contract based on bleeding purple if you read. I said although I preferred he stayed at Freo because he bleeds purple and has love for the club, for his own career perhaps he should look at other options to get a fresh start elsewhere.The bleeds purple thing annoys me. Why should that come into any selection decision or contract decision?
If we wanted 22 blokes that bleed purple we could pull them off this big footy board and give them contracts.
This is professional sport. It’s ruthless and unforgiving. If you are not good enough you will be found out. Sooner or later.
- involved in two goals, one to Fyfe and the other that started with his defensive efforts in the middle leading to chain of handballs , ending up with Amiss in the goal square
- took a mark in the middle of the ground that halted the run, when the GWS were on the spread and looked they were out
- two defensive pressure on the kicker resulting out of bounds. One led to Sturts shot on goal on the boundary
Okay, yeah making shit up..or maybe you go watch the game again without your haters lens on
Yeah, I was iffy about it at first but as of now I'm all aboard the Bolton train.Bailey playing week in, week out is a symptom of where our list (particularly our forwardline) is at.
Every week we have D grade performers there. Be it Emmett, Walters, Banners. Freddy has had some stinkers too.
We lost Shultz, in contract, due to family reasons. We need a plug n play A grade forward. The only one who seems to fit is Bolton. We need him to make it known he needs to come home for family reasons. I just don't see how our small forwards will do enough to take us to the next level. Even if we draft the best 1 or 2 in this draft.
Banners and or Emmett are decent depth players, that's it
Sent from my SM-S916B using Tapatalk
Lol , funny how you revert when I gave examples in the first half, which we were talking about and you said he didn't and I was making things upHe did a couple of positive things and had quite a few howlers too, including an indiscipline act. He was garbage and everyone knows it hence the reason why everyone on here wants him dropped bar you
Yeah he had an ok first half.Lol , funny how you revert when I gave examples in the first half, which we were talking about and you said he didn't and I was making things up
Good unbiased post.Bailey has been innefectual of late, but I remember him being among the matchwinner's through the first half of the season.
We're not even in finals contention without those early wins.
I'm happy for him to stay, but he's lost all leverage in contract negotiations as he can't say the match committee hasnt given him every chance to show his worth.
Good depth, but unless his early form becomes the mean he's always going to be B22 interchange/Peel bound.
Bailey has been innefectual of late, but I remember him being among the matchwinner's through the first half of the season.
We're not even in finals contention without those early wins.
I'm happy for him to stay, but he's lost all leverage in contract negotiations as he can't say the match committee hasnt given him every chance to show his worth.
Good depth, but unless his early form becomes the mean he's always going to be B22 interchange/Peel bound.
Good unbiased post.
People easy to dismiss that without banners we probably wouldn't of won the dogs first game or drew the pies game, but want to pin yesterday's loss solely on him.
I think playing different role and more fwd with Walters out, with deep fwd as opposed to earlier in the season , where he was more HHF with stints on wing has led to the form slump.
Also seems to be psychological with overthinking too much and trying to find a perfect kick or pass. Also needs to become more selfish , which he used to be criticized for
‘Match winners’ ??
Define that.
He’s had 1 coaches vote. Against Pies. Where we drew.
The bulldogs game he basically won off his own boot. He also bobbed up for clutch goals quite a bit early on in the year.‘Match winners’ ??
Define that.
He’s had 1 coaches vote. Against Pies. Where we drew.