Solved The Peter Falconio Disappearance

Remove this Banner Ad

Hard to believe it's 10 years since Bradley John Murdoch was charged for the murder of Peter Falconio.

There was an excellent article in the Herald Sun at the weekend about Murdoch's trial, and how the prosecutor was very concerned Joanna Lees' reluctance to return to Australia for the case, and subsequent demeanour might cost them a guilty verdict.

The prosecutor said Lees was then very reluctant to demonstrate to the court how she could bring her bound hands from behind her, under her legs and back in front. When she finally agreed to go ahead with it she performed the task effortlessly - which was apparently a big turning point in the case - because her testimony and credibility hung on it.
 
maybe already mentioned, if your life was at risk wouldn't you keep running (adrenaline) away from the killer instead of hiding in the bush
 
maybe already mentioned, if your life was at risk wouldn't you keep running (adrenaline) away from the killer instead of hiding in the bush

Unless you were in that situation for real there's no way of accurately gauging how you'd react and what you'd do. Some people under that kind of pressure actually just freeze like a rabbit in the headlights.

If you were a female being chased by an intimidating male and had your wits about you, hiding would probably makes a lot of sense.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Unless you were in that situation for real there's no way of accurately gauging how you'd react and what you'd do. Some people under that kind of pressure actually just freeze like a rabbit in the headlights.

If you were a female being chased by an intimidating male and had your wits about you, hiding would probably makes a lot of sense.
i guess we don't how one would feel/act in that situation, however she saw the dog (you would think the dog would be able to find you(sniff)) and i think she would would have noticed brad was older (about 15 years) and not the fittest person going around (big bloke), i believe she would have been fitter. shes lucky he or the dog didn't find her..
 
i guess we don't how one would feel/act in that situation, however she saw the dog (you would think the dog would be able to find you(sniff)) and i think she would would have noticed brad was older (about 15 years) and not the fittest person going around (big bloke), i believe she would have been fitter. shes lucky he or the dog didn't find her..

She is lucky the dog didn't find her. But with the fear she would have been experiencing and the adrenaline pumping through her veins she wouldn't have been capable of too many thought processes.
 
It appears that a woman rooting around on her boyfriend whole travelling is as grave a criminal as a murderer.
 
It was in another thread on here (Milat one) but there was a theory put up there about Joanna Lees and that she may have had sex with Murdoch so she could be released. Not entirely sold on that theory but it's intriguing how she got away. Don't trust her 100%.


Was that my post? I know i posted it somewhere, but it's a theory i've always had. It's a bit dubious i know, but for someone that's been through what she has for her story to not add up, doesn't make any sense.
 
Was that my post? I know i posted it somewhere, but it's a theory i've always had. It's a bit dubious i know, but for someone that's been through what she has for her story to not add up, doesn't make any sense.

Drawing a pretty long bow there I would have thought. Can you offer anything in support of your left-field theory other than "her story does not add up"?
 
Drawing a pretty long bow there I would have thought. Can you offer anything in support of your left-field theory other than "her story does not add up"?


Not really, other than the fact it was well known she changed details of her story at various times. Someone in her position wouldn't really to have anything to hide, so what is the point in changing the story all the time?
 
Not really, other than the fact it was well known she changed details of her story at various times. Someone in her position wouldn't really to have anything to hide, so what is the point in changing the story all the time?

My question was can you offer anything in support of your theory Joanne Lees had sex with Bradley Murdoch.

It looks like you can't.
 
My question was can you offer anything in support of your theory Joanne Lees had sex with Bradley Murdoch.

It looks like you can't.


Nope, none at all. It was just a wild speculative theory based on the inconsistencies in her story. Many have thought that Bradley Murdoch had nothing to do with Falconio/Lees at all and that he was apparently a "fall guy" so it's not all that far fetched to speculate about different possibilities. :p

http://truecrimezine.com/peter-falconio-joanne-lees/
 
Nope, none at all. It was just a wild speculative theory based on the inconsistencies in her story. Many have thought that Bradley Murdoch had nothing to do with Falconio/Lees at all and that he was apparently a "fall guy".

http://truecrimezine.com/peter-falconio-joanne-lees/

Some food for thought anyway.

One minute you suggest Joanne Lees had sex with Bradley Murdoch, and the next you are offering information suggesting Murdock wasn't even there :)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Interesting discussion about this on websleuths.
 
Interesting discussion about this on websleuths.

brendan-fraser-encinoman-1.jpg

Linkavitch Chamofsky ??
 
Hard to believe it's 10 years since Bradley John Murdoch was charged for the murder of Peter Falconio.

There was an excellent article in the Herald Sun at the weekend about Murdoch's trial, and how the prosecutor was very concerned Joanna Lees' reluctance to return to Australia for the case, and subsequent demeanour might cost them a guilty verdict.

The prosecutor said Lees was then very reluctant to demonstrate to the court how she could bring her bound hands from behind her, under her legs and back in front. When she finally agreed to go ahead with it she performed the task effortlessly - which was apparently a big turning point in the case - because her testimony and credibility hung on it.
I don't doubt that Murdoch did it, but I can also understand the Lawyers doubt. She seemed to get over it very quickly. And that opens up a whole new array of questions.
 
I don't doubt that Murdoch did it, but I can also understand the Lawyers doubt. She seemed to get over it very quickly. And that opens up a whole new array of questions.

My post you quoted off was about the Herald Sun referring to the prosecutor's concern they might struggle to prove Murdoch's guilt without Lees full co-operation.

The prosecutor didn't express doubts about Murdoch's guilt. Only that unless Lees appeared and demonstrated how she could bring her bound hands from behind her to the front they'd struggle.
 
Reckon Murdoch did it. But can't work out his motive. Reckon he somehow got spooked or something that he was being followed. You'd be paranoid enough running drugs on highways, and being out there on your own can do funny things to your thinking.

You really have to drive the Stuart to appreciate the sheer remoteness. It's mind boggling.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Solved The Peter Falconio Disappearance

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top