The Player A Vs Player B SUPERMEGATHREAD!!

[Kaiser Powser]

Re: Leunberger or Jonathan Griffin????

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!
I am giving one of Leunberger or Jon Griffin the chop to make way for Dean Cox…
Leunberger and Griffin are approx same price so this does not factor in…
which one should stay, which one should go???
Such a hard decison!
AAAAAAAArrgggghhhh

I would keep the Berger, as he has a big question mark about his potential.
Either way, this should not be such a huge call, you will probably never end up cashing in on either of these, if your forward and centre cash cows are half decent.

 

[Tippaz]

Re: Leunberger or Jonathan Griffin????

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!
I am giving one of Leunberger or Jon Griffin the chop to make way for Dean Cox…
Leunberger and Griffin are approx same price so this does not factor in…
which one should stay, which one should go???
Such a hard decison!
AAAAAAAArrgggghhhh

stick with L'berger mate.

he's got better attributes.

 

[Tippaz]

Re: Matthew Stokes or Shannon Grant

I'm in this same situation, except I'm using Davey instead of Waite.

I'm dumping Davey because I want no Melbourne players and he will drop amazingly in price next week. Playing the Cats he won't score much at all.

I've got $375,500 but with many other problems that I need cash for eg, Coughlan, Lovett-Murray was ruled out this week with a groin.

I'm lost with what to do, I've already got Murphy and Hill, Thompson so I don't wan't Grant.

I've narrowed it down to O'Keefe (won't have much cash) and Stokes (need Geelong players)

i don't rate Stokes as a fantasy big gun.

O'Keefe usually gets the job done. if you're looking at 1 of the 2. get him.

if haven't got Porplyzia - GET HIM !! (midfielder classified as a forward)

dunno much Davey's injury - sorry

Have no clue what to do. Should I keep Davey and risk the price drop (how is he in anyway, his ankle!) or trade. I'll have 17 left.

 

[mung]

Heath Shaw v Darren Milburn v Clint Bolton

Heath Shaw v Darren Milburn v Clint Bolton

I'm looking to bring one of these backs in.

Does anyone think Bolton has turned the corner and will start to produce consistently good DT scores like he has in the first two rounds?

I'm very skeptical, but is quite tempting if I can save money.

As for the other two, both proven guns and I'm finding it hard to separate them.

 

[geelong16]

Re: Heath Shaw v Darren Milburn v Clint Bolton

Heath Shaw v Darren Milburn v Clint Bolton

I'm looking to bring one of these backs in.

Does anyone think Bolton has turned the corner and will start to produce consistently good DT scores like he has in the first two rounds?

I'm very skeptical, but is quite tempting if I can save money.

As for the other two, both proven guns and I'm finding it hard to separate them.

Craig not Clint Bolton and i think he will be a good dream teamer this year but milburn and shaw will be better, changed a backman for raines this week and i chose shaw, i was tossing up with the same scenario pretty much, i say go Shaw.

What do you think i should do i have rioli, hill and gamble in my forward line.
i can have to as emergencies but which one should i bring onto the field this week? cheers

 

[Beau_Waters for PM]

Re: Heath Shaw v Darren Milburn v Clint Bolton

Heath Shaw v Darren Milburn v Clint Bolton

I'm looking to bring one of these backs in.

Does anyone think Bolton has turned the corner and will start to produce consistently good DT scores like he has in the first two rounds?

I'm very skeptical, but is quite tempting if I can save money.

As for the other two, both proven guns and I'm finding it hard to separate them.

Definitely Shaw. Bolton has patches of good DT form, but is not consistent enough. Milburn is probably the most consistent of the three, but I think Shaw is more able to bring in the big 120+ scores whereas Milburn will continue to bring in 75-95 each week.

 

[BlahBlahBlah]

Tough to call. Both showed immense talent in the NAB cup, and are continuing on that good form. My only concern with Gamble is that with some of Geelong's players coming back into the side he may be squeezed out, but on the Geelong board the general consensus seems to be that he will hold his spot for the time being.
It's a tough choice.

Who's to come back that might necessitate Gamble getting dropped.

Here's their injury list

Brad Ottens (ankle) – 1 week
David Wojcinski (finger) - test
Nathan Djerrkura (quad) - 3 – 4 weeks
Matthew Egan (foot) – indefinite
Andrew Mackie (quad) – 1-2 weeks

Ottens - West to make way when he returns
Wojcinski - he'll play
Mackie - Maybe Taylor to make way.

He out shone Tomahawk comfortably last week.

Of this weeks 7 man interchange
Int (from):Trent West, Max Rooke, James Kelly, David Wojcinski, Brent Prismall, David Johnson, Shannon Byrnes

I think bold will play, so would suggest he's safe for the while

 

[BlahBlahBlah]

Who's to come back that might necessitate Gamble getting dropped.

Here's their injury list

Brad Ottens (ankle) – 1 week
David Wojcinski (finger) - test
Nathan Djerrkura (quad) - 3 – 4 weeks
Matthew Egan (foot) – indefinite
Andrew Mackie (quad) – 1-2 weeks

Ottens - West to make way when he returns
Wojcinski - he'll play
Mackie - Maybe Taylor to make way.

He out shone Tomahawk comfortably last week.

Of this weeks 7 man interchange
Int (from):Trent West, Max Rooke, James Kelly, David Wojcinski, Brent Prismall, David Johnson, Shannon Byrnes

I think bold will play, so would suggest he's safe for the while

I was wrong, here's their selected team, just announced

B: Tom Harley - Matthew Scarlett - Josh Hunt
HB: Darren Milburn - Harry Taylor - Corey Enright
C: Cameron Ling - Joel Selwood - Jimmy Bartel
HF: Steve Johnson - Cameron Mooney - Paul Chapman
F: Ryan Gamble - Tom Hawkins - Mathew Stokes
Foll: Mark Blake - Gary Ablett - Joel Corey
Int (from): Trent West, James Kelly, David Wojcinski, Max Rooke

 

[LemmingMaster]

I think it is Shannon Byrnes poor disposal that gets him the chop.