the players that no one seems to be mentioning

Remove this Banner Ad

Trent Cotchin!!!!!!

I heard he wont play round 1 and may miss more, has had some serious injury concerns over the pre season. Im thinking he could miss the first 2 or 3 games.

I was thinking about him as he is full of class and a good price range. Also doubt his ability to be a keeper in 09.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Bananayard, can you please post your thoughts on Gibbs. Seems to me you dont rate him, and im interested to hear your reasoning.

He's a few for the affirmative side ;)

- Fantastic numbers at U/16 and U/18 levels show him to be a natural ball winner
- Boak is in a much more crowded MF IMO
- Gibbs averaged 101 over last 9 rounds: not saying that this is what he will average! Just shows his potential though
- Gibbs will never get first tag with judd around (not saying boak will get tagged, im just saying!)
- Gibbs kick to handball ratio was 1:4 in 2007, and 1:3 in 2008, boaks was 0.8 and 1.0 (a significant difference)
- Boak has never posted big DT scores (highest 5 are 123, 106, 101, 100, 98), compared to gibbs (135, 130, 114, 114, 112)
- Boak a bit more injury prone? (not 100% certain though)

So what are your thoughts?
Couldnt care less about Under 18s etc. Means little. I could find plenty of blokes who dominated u/18s and did nothing at AFL and vice verser. Next.

lol @ PA having more mid options than Carlton. You're dreaming. Judd, Stevens, Murphy, Carazzo, Simpson, Walker, Scotland. Theres a reason why Gibbs has been used as a tagger. PA have Kornes, Cassisi (tagger), S.Burgoyne and Salopek. Thats all. PBurg, is a HBF, Chad is a KPP - rarely ever used in the centre. JCarr is a reject, Pearce is a flanker. Boak is an offensive weapon. High draft pick of a super draft. Ready to break out.

Tag. whatever. Boak will NEVER tag. Gibbs will most certainly tag like he did all of last year.

Daniel Cross' handball:kick ratio is bloody poor for DT. What the **** does that mean? That he's bad? That Dal Santo is a better DTer? LMAO :D :D

High scores. lol. Boak only averaged less than 4 dt points a game than Gibbs did in 08. More midfield time - 97mins for Boak, Gibbs 104mins in 08. Gibbs' 2 highest scores came when Carlton played a shit high posession game. Boak doesnt need that game plan to be good. The only team thats gonna try and increase a higher possesion game is PA. Carlton are gonna come good so they wont revert to rubbish football. Take those pointless and cheap 130s out and the averages are very similar.

You're too easy.
 
Couldnt care less about Under 18s etc. Means little. I could find plenty of blokes who dominated u/18s and did nothing at AFL and vice verser. Next.

lol @ PA having more mid options than Carlton. You're dreaming. Judd, Stevens, Murphy, Carazzo, Simpson, Walker, Scotland. Theres a reason why Gibbs has been used as a tagger. PA have Kornes, Cassisi (tagger), S.Burgoyne and Salopek. Thats all. PBurg, is a HBF, Chad is a KPP - rarely ever used in the centre. JCarr is a reject, Pearce is a flanker. Boak is an offensive weapon. High draft pick of a super draft. Ready to break out.

Tag. whatever. Boak will NEVER tag. Gibbs will most certainly tag like he did all of last year.

Daniel Cross' handball:kick ratio is bloody poor for DT. What the **** does that mean? That he's bad? That Dal Santo is a better DTer? LMAO :D :D

High scores. lol. Boak only averaged less than 4 dt points a game than Gibbs did in 08. More midfield time - 97mins for Boak, Gibbs 104mins in 08. Gibbs' 2 highest scores came when Carlton played a shit high posession game. Boak doesnt need that game plan to be good. The only team thats gonna try and increase a higher possesion game is PA. Carlton are gonna come good so they wont revert to rubbish football. Take those pointless and cheap 130s out and the averages are very similar.

You're too easy.

Loving the argument, keep it going, but I'm not too sure about "Take out all the good scores and they average similar". Pretty sure Cox and Meesen are the same too in that case.
 
Couldnt care less about Under 18s etc. Means little. I could find plenty of blokes who dominated u/18s and did nothing at AFL and vice verser. Next.

It still does not hurt, he has proved that it was no fluke his U/18's form.

lol @ PA having more mid options than Carlton. You're dreaming. Judd, Stevens, Murphy, Carazzo, Simpson, Walker, Scotland.
Carazzo, Walker and Scotland will not play in the midfield that much in 2009.

Tag. whatever. Boak will NEVER tag.
He meant, get tagged, not tag someone.

Daniel Cross' handball:kick ratio is bloody poor for DT. What the **** does that mean? That he's bad? That Dal Santo is a better DTer? LMAO :D :D
If Cross lifted his handball to kick ration, he would be a lot better DT'er, so yes it does matter. Simon Black board.

Gibbs has missed 1 game in the two years he has played, Boak has missed 14 games. Take from that what you will, but I like the idea of having my potential premium player with some proof that he is durable.
 
Couldnt care less about Under 18s etc. Means little. I could find plenty of blokes who dominated u/18s and did nothing at AFL and vice verser. Next.

lol @ PA having more mid options than Carlton. You're dreaming. Judd, Stevens, Murphy, Carazzo, Simpson, Walker, Scotland. Theres a reason why Gibbs has been used as a tagger. PA have Kornes, Cassisi (tagger), S.Burgoyne and Salopek. Thats all. PBurg, is a HBF, Chad is a KPP - rarely ever used in the centre. JCarr is a reject, Pearce is a flanker. Boak is an offensive weapon. High draft pick of a super draft. Ready to break out.

Tag. whatever. Boak will NEVER tag. Gibbs will most certainly tag like he did all of last year.

Daniel Cross' handball:kick ratio is bloody poor for DT. What the **** does that mean? That he's bad? That Dal Santo is a better DTer? LMAO :D :D

High scores. lol. Boak only averaged less than 4 dt points a game than Gibbs did in 08. More midfield time - 97mins for Boak, Gibbs 104mins in 08. Gibbs' 2 highest scores came when Carlton played a shit high posession game. Boak doesnt need that game plan to be good. The only team thats gonna try and increase a higher possesion game is PA. Carlton are gonna come good so they wont revert to rubbish football. Take those pointless and cheap 130s out and the averages are very similar.

You're too easy.

LOL, no wonder you got carded, you have no idea. No point even arguing those points, you'll realise how silly some of them are soon enough.
 
Couldnt care less about Under 18s etc. Means little. I could find plenty of blokes who dominated u/18s and did nothing at AFL and vice verser. Next.

lol @ PA having more mid options than Carlton. You're dreaming. Judd, Stevens, Murphy, Carazzo, Simpson, Walker, Scotland. Theres a reason why Gibbs has been used as a tagger. PA have Kornes, Cassisi (tagger), S.Burgoyne and Salopek. Thats all. PBurg, is a HBF, Chad is a KPP - rarely ever used in the centre. JCarr is a reject, Pearce is a flanker. Boak is an offensive weapon. High draft pick of a super draft. Ready to break out.

Tag. whatever. Boak will NEVER tag. Gibbs will most certainly tag like he did all of last year.

Daniel Cross' handball:kick ratio is bloody poor for DT. What the **** does that mean? That he's bad? That Dal Santo is a better DTer? LMAO :D :D

High scores. lol. Boak only averaged less than 4 dt points a game than Gibbs did in 08. More midfield time - 97mins for Boak, Gibbs 104mins in 08. Gibbs' 2 highest scores came when Carlton played a shit high posession game. Boak doesnt need that game plan to be good. The only team thats gonna try and increase a higher possesion game is PA. Carlton are gonna come good so they wont revert to rubbish football. Take those pointless and cheap 130s out and the averages are very similar.

You're too easy.
Interesting that you mention Walker, Carrazzo, Scotland as midfielders for Carlton, but omit Chad, Carr, Pearce, etc as midfielders for PA. I don't see the difference.
 
Getting the thread back on track...

I'm throwing up Matthew Bate...

averaged 75 from 12 games in hist first season - not a feat many achieve (in their 1st seasons Gibbs avg 54, Cooney 47, Deledio 61 etc...)

Last year averaged 79.8 with no preseason and did not play his first game until round eight.

I would not be surprised to see him average 85+ or even 90 if he stays injury free.

I think if he played for Hawthorn or Geelong we would all be buzzing about him...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Couldnt care less about Under 18s etc. Means little. I could find plenty of blokes who dominated u/18s and did nothing at AFL and vice verser. Next.

lol @ PA having more mid options than Carlton. You're dreaming. Judd, Stevens, Murphy, Carazzo, Simpson, Walker, Scotland. Theres a reason why Gibbs has been used as a tagger. PA have Kornes, Cassisi (tagger), S.Burgoyne and Salopek. Thats all. PBurg, is a HBF, Chad is a KPP - rarely ever used in the centre. JCarr is a reject, Pearce is a flanker. Boak is an offensive weapon. High draft pick of a super draft. Ready to break out.

Tag. whatever. Boak will NEVER tag. Gibbs will most certainly tag like he did all of last year.

Daniel Cross' handball:kick ratio is bloody poor for DT. What the **** does that mean? That he's bad? That Dal Santo is a better DTer? LMAO :D :D

High scores. lol. Boak only averaged less than 4 dt points a game than Gibbs did in 08. More midfield time - 97mins for Boak, Gibbs 104mins in 08. Gibbs' 2 highest scores came when Carlton played a shit high posession game. Boak doesnt need that game plan to be good. The only team thats gonna try and increase a higher possesion game is PA. Carlton are gonna come good so they wont revert to rubbish football. Take those pointless and cheap 130s out and the averages are very similar.

You're too easy.
PWND.















I mean you got pwnd by the red card, you just totally embaressed yourself by trying to pwn that guy :eek:
 
Kade Simpson anyone? Not just because he scored high tonight though. He's about 24 years old, playing in a team on the rise and has the ability to score hunjies. Playing in a good side = consistancy , so i think he'll impress this year.
 
Couldnt care less about Under 18s etc. Means little. I could find plenty of blokes who dominated u/18s and did nothing at AFL and vice verser. Next.

lol @ PA having more mid options than Carlton. You're dreaming. Judd, Stevens, Murphy, Carazzo, Simpson, Walker, Scotland. Theres a reason why Gibbs has been used as a tagger. PA have Kornes, Cassisi (tagger), S.Burgoyne and Salopek. Thats all. PBurg, is a HBF, Chad is a KPP - rarely ever used in the centre. JCarr is a reject, Pearce is a flanker. Boak is an offensive weapon. High draft pick of a super draft. Ready to break out.

Tag. whatever. Boak will NEVER tag. Gibbs will most certainly tag like he did all of last year.

Daniel Cross' handball:kick ratio is bloody poor for DT. What the **** does that mean? That he's bad? That Dal Santo is a better DTer? LMAO :D :D

High scores. lol. Boak only averaged less than 4 dt points a game than Gibbs did in 08. More midfield time - 97mins for Boak, Gibbs 104mins in 08. Gibbs' 2 highest scores came when Carlton played a shit high posession game. Boak doesnt need that game plan to be good. The only team thats gonna try and increase a higher possesion game is PA. Carlton are gonna come good so they wont revert to rubbish football. Take those pointless and cheap 130s out and the averages are very similar.

You're too easy.

Here i was trying to get into a decent debate about gibbs v boak and the pros and cons to get people thinking about the players. Wish he hadnt been so stubborn...

A few points though:

Gibbs' 2 highest scores came when Carlton played a shit high posession game. Boak doesnt need that game plan to be good. The only team thats gonna try and increase a higher possesion game is PA. Carlton are gonna come good so they wont revert to rubbish football.

Notice how hawthorn and geelong and west coast in their prime had high DT scorers - mitchell/hodge/franklin/, ABC/Chapman/SJ/Mackie, Judd/Cousins/Kerr in their glory years. Most of them mids too! If they come good, im sure gibbs will score well too, and have some top scorers (i say midfield - kinda relate them to WC a bit in their glory years - premier MF, ok backs, probably lacking a few goal kickers).

Oh, and about the team midfields - gibbs, murphy, judd seems pretty settle for me. None of them really play any other positions, their best in the middle? Makes sense to me! I think port with salopek, carr, cassissi, kane, chad, p burgoyne, boak, pearce rotating through is a bit more clustered. Just my opinion though.

Also good points on durability raised.

Dont get my wrong though, boak could be a beauty and average 100 if everything clicks and he gets alot of time on ball and all goes well. I just think gibbs is a safer option with probably a higher ceiling - thats me personally though!
 
Couldnt care less about Under 18s etc. Means little. I could find plenty of blokes who dominated u/18s and did nothing at AFL and vice verser. Next.

lol @ PA having more mid options than Carlton. You're dreaming. Judd, Stevens, Murphy, Carazzo, Simpson, Walker, Scotland. Theres a reason why Gibbs has been used as a tagger. PA have Kornes, Cassisi (tagger), S.Burgoyne and Salopek. Thats all. PBurg, is a HBF, Chad is a KPP - rarely ever used in the centre. JCarr is a reject, Pearce is a flanker. Boak is an offensive weapon. High draft pick of a super draft. Ready to break out.

Tag. whatever. Boak will NEVER tag. Gibbs will most certainly tag like he did all of last year.

Daniel Cross' handball:kick ratio is bloody poor for DT. What the **** does that mean? That he's bad? That Dal Santo is a better DTer? LMAO :D :D

High scores. lol. Boak only averaged less than 4 dt points a game than Gibbs did in 08. More midfield time - 97mins for Boak, Gibbs 104mins in 08. Gibbs' 2 highest scores came when Carlton played a shit high posession game. Boak doesnt need that game plan to be good. The only team thats gonna try and increase a higher possesion game is PA. Carlton are gonna come good so they wont revert to rubbish football. Take those pointless and cheap 130s out and the averages are very similar.

You're too easy.

Every single point you made is wrong, stupid or both.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

the players that no one seems to be mentioning

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top