- May 3, 2007
- 39,380
- 23,010
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Man City, Valencia, Lazio, Panthers
Glad freo didn't go 0-10 in 2017, but there you goSeriously huge ROFL.
Here's a racist joke for you....still laughing....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Glad freo didn't go 0-10 in 2017, but there you goSeriously huge ROFL.
Here's a racist joke for you....still laughing....
he is with us for another 3 years. Oh and he has played youfErr...no he is not.
Until this year he has done nothing but plunder lists in pursuit of a flag, until there is no hope left and then he up's stumps. UNtill this last year refused to play kids.
He is a megalomaniac in sheeps clothing.
I've written off our first 6 games as unrepresentative of our quality. Since then we average 102.44 points for and 66.13 points against.
It would be hard to argue our first six weeks was representative but they're on our permanent record.I think every team would look pretty good if you wrote off their losses.
I think every team would look pretty good if you wrote off their losses.
that and the 2 home losses vs the demons and swans....I was thinking the same thing
I reckon the Crows record would look way more intimidating if you took out the loss to Nth Melb way back in rnd 7
I think every team would look pretty good if you wrote off their losses.
Can Geelong discount our three week periods of losses against Collingwood Gold Coast and Essendon? We clearly just had a period that was unrepresentative of what the side can achieve.With Swans it's a clear delineation pre and post round 7. If the losses had been evenly spread out I wouldn't make the argument, clearly.
Can Geelong discount our three week periods of losses against Collingwood Gold Coast and Essendon? We clearly just had a period that was unrepresentative of what the side can achieve.
What rubbish.
It was a string of games unrepresentative of our style of play, it doesn't matter if it was at the start or not...seriously what a crock mate.Was it at the very start of the season?
Yeah this 'Standard' thing is rubbish. The premier is the team that wins the grand final - simple as that.
Pray to god that troy Pannell doesn't umpire any of the crows finals.Actually further to taking away our worst six games of the year, if we take away Adelaide's first quarter against Sydney in Rnd 22 where they got 5 goals ahead, you'll find the final 3 quarters were way more representative of the game, thus should be awarded the win
/bizarrebase615logic
It was a string of games unrepresentative of our style of play, it doesn't matter if it was at the start or not...seriously what a crock mate.
I don't see how. Cherry picking stats for yourself is simply disingenuous.Of course it matters. This thread is about whether the team is in premiership standard form, not your points record at the end of the season. Uninterrupted form over the proposed benchmark since game 6 is totally different in this particular argument than having periods in the middle of the season where a couple of losses took you below that benchmark.
Of course it matters. This thread is about whether the team is in premiership standard form, not your points record at the end of the season. Uninterrupted form over the proposed benchmark since game 6 is totally different in this particular argument than having periods in the middle of the season where a couple of losses took you below that benchmark.
Except the statistic used to assess premiership standard form in this thread is literally points record at the end of the season.
Richmond are the 2017 premiers. 90 points for, 76 againstIf the dogs didn't meet the premiership standard then the flag should be declared null and void and given to the reigning premiers at the time.
We have standards for a reason!!!
crows were intimidating today just like Dustin Martins father! lolI was thinking the same thing
I reckon the Crows record would look way more intimidating if you took out the loss to Nth Melb way back in rnd 7
Only premiership standard is winning the GFOf course it matters. This thread is about whether the team is in premiership standard form, not your points record at the end of the season. Uninterrupted form over the proposed benchmark since game 6 is totally different in this particular argument than having periods in the middle of the season where a couple of losses took you below that benchmark.
Dogs won the 2016 flag scoring 84 points a game conceding 72. Tigers won the 2017 flag scoring 90.5 conceding 76.5.Should be 13 of the last 15.
Sydney 2005 - 86 for and 74 against.
Sydney wasn't a once off. Dogs in 2016 and Tigers this year defied the stats.Sydney in 2005 were a once off. They're not the standard you aim for, they're an anomaly that probably won't be repeated in years.
It's funny that 86 points against is the high point for premiership defences. For most teams these days that would be a match losing score.
Freo barely average better than that as an offensive score. I would love to see Freo's scoring improve, but I don't see it so long as plodders and hacks like Suban and De Boer are continually up for selection.
the Squiggle can kiss my Kim Kardashian.The squiggle has been telling us this for years..... NEXT!
Dogs won the 2016 flag scoring 84 points a game conceding 72. Tigers won the 2017 flag scoring 90.5 conceding 76.5.
Sydney wasn't a once off. Dogs in 2016 and Tigers this year defied the stats.
the Squiggle can kiss my Kim Kardashian.
Oh and your team didn't score an average of 100 points a game and conceded 85. Your Tigers scored 90.5 points and concede 76.5. So.... Do you want to retract that stupid statement or do you want to hand back your 2017 flag for not scoring 100 points a game and conceding 86?
Dogs won the 2016 flag scoring 84 points a game conceding 72. Tigers won the 2017 flag scoring 90.5 conceding 76.5.
Sydney wasn't a once off. Dogs in 2016 and Tigers this year defied the stats.
the Squiggle can kiss my Kim Kardashian.
Oh and your team didn't score an average of 100 points a game and conceded 85. Your Tigers scored 90.5 points and concede 76.5. So.... Do you want to retract that stupid statement or do you want to hand back your 2017 flag for not scoring 100 points a game and conceding 86?